Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Parul Agarwal

· Assistant Professor

University of Pennsylvania · Rehabilitation Medicine

Active 1963–2024

h-index24
Citations2.1k
Papers15051 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Parul Agarwal — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Parul Agarwal, MD, is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine in the Hematology-Oncology department at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine. She serves as the GI Cancer Quality and Care Innovation Leader and Medical Director at the Perelman Center of Advanced Medicine. Her research focuses on gastrointestinal cancers, immunotherapy, and clinical trials related to pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. Dr. Agarwal has contributed to multiple clinical studies and publications in the field of cancer immunotherapy, neoadjuvant treatments, and genetic testing in pancreatic cancers. Her work emphasizes improving patient outcomes through innovative therapeutic strategies and translational research.

Research topics

  • Family medicine
  • Medicine
  • Computer Science
  • Medical education
  • Library science
  • Mathematics
  • Psychiatry
  • Statistics
  • Operations management

Selected publications

  • Impact of American Association of Neurological Surgeons Medical Student Interest Groups on Participation in Organized Neurosurgery, Research Productivity, and Residency Match Success

    World Neurosurgery · 2020 · 39 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Medicine
    • Family medicine
    • Medical education
  • Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons

    Journal of neurosurgery · 2020 · 50 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Medicine
    • Statistics

    OBJECTIVE: Publication metrics such as the Hirsch index (h-index) are often used to evaluate and compare research productivity in academia. The h-index is not a field-normalized statistic and can therefore be dependent on overall rates of publication and citation within specific fields. Thus, a metric that adjusts for this while measuring individual contributions would be preferable. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new, field-normalized, article-level metric called the "relative citation ratio" (RCR) that can be used to more accurately compare author productivity between fields. The mean RCR is calculated as the total number of citations per year of a publication divided by the average field-specific citations per year, whereas the weighted RCR is the sum of all article-level RCR scores over an author's career. The present study was performed to determine how various factors, such as academic rank, career duration, a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree, and sex, impact the RCR to analyze research productivity among academic neurosurgeons. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the iCite database. All physician faculty affiliated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurological surgery programs were eligible for analysis. Sex, career duration, academic rank, additional degrees, total publications, mean RCR, and weighted RCR were collected for each individual. Mean RCR and weighted RCR were compared between variables to assess patterns of analysis by using SAS software version 9.4. RESULTS: A total of 1687 neurosurgery faculty members from 125 institutions were included in the analysis. Advanced academic rank, longer career duration, and PhD acquisition were all associated with increased mean and weighted RCRs. Male sex was associated with having an increased weighted RCR but not an increased mean RCR score. Overall, neurological surgeons were highly productive, with a median RCR of 1.37 (IQR 0.93-1.97) and a median weighted RCR of 28.56 (IQR 7.99-85.65). CONCLUSIONS: The RCR and its derivatives are new metrics that help fill in the gaps of other indices for research output. Here, the authors found that advanced academic rank, longer career duration, and PhD acquisition were all associated with increased mean and weighted RCRs. Male sex was associated with having an increased weighted, but not mean, RCR score, most likely because of historically unequal opportunities for women within the field. Furthermore, the data showed that current academic neurosurgeons are exceptionally productive compared to both physicians in other specialties and the general scientific community.

Frequent coauthors

  • Nitin Agarwal

    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    134 shared
  • David R. Hansberry

    Drexel University

    47 shared
  • Kush C. Shah

    Emory University

    36 shared
  • Ira M. Goldstein

    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

    31 shared
  • Robert M. Friedlander

    26 shared
  • Samuel E. Navon

    25 shared
  • Scott D. Smith

    23 shared
  • Robert F. Heary

    20 shared

Labs

  • Parul Agarwal LabPI

Education

  • B.A., Medical Sciences

    Boston University

    2011
  • M.D.

    Boston University School of Medicine

    2015

Similar researchers at University of Pennsylvania

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Parul Agarwal

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup