Steven Cooper
· Research Assistant ProfessorUniversity of Utah · Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Active 1972–2024
Research topics
- Ecology
- Biology
- Computer Science
- Engineering ethics
- Engineering
- Data science
- Environmental resource management
- Environmental science
Selected publications
eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects, and future prospects
The Science of The Total Environment · 2022 · 89 citations
- Environmental resource management
- Ecology
- Biology
Monitoring of biota is pivotal for the assessment and conservation of ecosystems. Environments worldwide are being continuously and increasingly exposed to multiple adverse impacts, and the accuracy and reliability of the biomonitoring tools that can be employed shape not only the present, but more importantly, the future of entire habitats. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding data provides a quick, affordable, and reliable molecular approach for biodiversity assessments. However, while extensively employed in aquatic and terrestrial surface environments, eDNA-based studies targeting subterranean ecosystems are still uncommon due to the lack of accessibility and the cryptic nature of these environments and their species. Recent advances in genetic and genomic analyses have established a promising framework for shedding new light on subterranean biodiversity and ecology. To address current knowledge and the future use of eDNA methods in groundwaters and caves, this review explores conceptual and technical aspects of the application and its potential in subterranean systems. We briefly introduce subterranean biota and describe the most used traditional sampling techniques. Next, eDNA characteristics, application, and limitations in the subsurface environment are outlined. Last, we provide suggestions on how to overcome caveats and delineate some of the research avenues that will likely shape this field in the near future. We advocate that eDNA analyses, when carefully conducted and ideally combined with conventional sampling techniques, will substantially increase understanding and enable crucial expansion of subterranean community characterisation. Given the importance of groundwater and cave ecosystems for nature and humans, eDNA can bring to the surface essential insights, such as study of ecosystem assemblages and rare species detection, which are critical for the preservation of life below, as well as above, the ground.
Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020 · 143 citations
- Computer Science
- Ecology
- Biology
ABSTRACT Five decades ago, a landmark paper in Science titled The Cave Environment heralded caves as ideal natural experimental laboratories in which to develop and address general questions in geology, ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. Although the ‘caves as laboratory’ paradigm has since been advocated by subterranean biologists, there are few examples of studies that successfully translated their results into general principles. The contemporary era of big data, modelling tools, and revolutionary advances in genetics and (meta)genomics provides an opportunity to revisit unresolved questions and challenges, as well as examine promising new avenues of research in subterranean biology. Accordingly, we have developed a roadmap to guide future research endeavours in subterranean biology by adapting a well‐established methodology of ‘horizon scanning’ to identify the highest priority research questions across six subject areas. Based on the expert opinion of 30 scientists from around the globe with complementary expertise and of different academic ages, we assembled an initial list of 258 fundamental questions concentrating on macroecology and microbial ecology, adaptation, evolution, and conservation. Subsequently, through online surveys, 130 subterranean biologists with various backgrounds assisted us in reducing our list to 50 top‐priority questions. These research questions are broad in scope and ready to be addressed in the next decade. We believe this exercise will stimulate research towards a deeper understanding of subterranean biology and foster hypothesis‐driven studies likely to resonate broadly from the traditional boundaries of this field.
Recent grants
Frequent coauthors
- 260 shared
William F. Humphreys
Australian Museum
- 172 shared
Andrew D. Austin
- 124 shared
Tessa M. Bradford
University of Adelaide
- 79 shared
Mark S. Harvey
- 68 shared
Terry Bertozzi
- 68 shared
Perry G. Beasley‐Hall
- 62 shared
Rachael A. King
American Cancer Society
- 58 shared
Michelle T. Guzik
University of Adelaide
Education
- 2003
Ph.D., Earth and Planetary Sciences
Harvard University
Similar researchers at University of Utah
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Steven Cooper
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup