Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Robert E. Kraut

Robert E. Kraut

· Herbert A. Simon Professor of Human-Computer Interaction, Emeritus, School of Computer Science and Joint Appointment at Tepper School of BusinessVerified

Carnegie Mellon University · Economics

Active 1972–2024

h-index93
Citations37.9k
Papers36339 last 5y
Funding$6.9M
See your match with Robert E. Kraut — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

As a researcher, I have broad interests in the design and social impact of information technologies in our personal lives, in small groups, and in organizations. I conduct research in the five major areas below. You can see my latest research on these topics by going to my articles or books page.

Research topics

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical psychology
  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being

    npj Digital Medicine · 2023 · 413 citations

    • Psychology
    • Medicine
    • Clinical psychology

    Conversational artificial intelligence (AI), particularly AI-based conversational agents (CAs), is gaining traction in mental health care. Despite their growing usage, there is a scarcity of comprehensive evaluations of their impact on mental health and well-being. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to fill this gap by synthesizing evidence on the effectiveness of AI-based CAs in improving mental health and factors influencing their effectiveness and user experience. Twelve databases were searched for experimental studies of AI-based CAs' effects on mental illnesses and psychological well-being published before May 26, 2023. Out of 7834 records, 35 eligible studies were identified for systematic review, out of which 15 randomized controlled trials were included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that AI-based CAs significantly reduce symptoms of depression (Hedge's g 0.64 [95% CI 0.17-1.12]) and distress (Hedge's g 0.7 [95% CI 0.18-1.22]). These effects were more pronounced in CAs that are multimodal, generative AI-based, integrated with mobile/instant messaging apps, and targeting clinical/subclinical and elderly populations. However, CA-based interventions showed no significant improvement in overall psychological well-being (Hedge's g 0.32 [95% CI -0.13 to 0.78]). User experience with AI-based CAs was largely shaped by the quality of human-AI therapeutic relationships, content engagement, and effective communication. These findings underscore the potential of AI-based CAs in addressing mental health issues. Future research should investigate the underlying mechanisms of their effectiveness, assess long-term effects across various mental health outcomes, and evaluate the safe integration of large language models (LLMs) in mental health care.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Sara Kiesler

    Carnegie Mellon University

    29 shared
  • Haiyi Zhu

    Carnegie Mellon University

    28 shared
  • Aniket Kittur

    California Miramar University

    27 shared
  • Susan R. Fussell

    Cornell University

    25 shared
  • Diyi Yang

    21 shared
  • Moira Burke

    Meta (United States)

    20 shared
  • Laura Dabbish

    Carnegie Mellon University

    18 shared
  • Robert Fish

    16 shared

Labs

Awards & honors

  • CHI 2016 SIGCHI Lifetime Research Award

Similar researchers at Carnegie Mellon University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Robert E. Kraut

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup