Jorge Chavarro
· Associate Professor, Department of Medicine Associate Professor of Nutrition and EpidemiologyHarvard University · Nutrition
Active 2007–2024
About
Jorge Chavarro is an Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine, as well as an Associate Professor of Nutrition and Epidemiology at Harvard Medical School. His professional focus encompasses research in nutrition, epidemiology, and related health sciences. He is affiliated with multiple Harvard institutions, including the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and collaborates with various hospitals such as Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, and others. His work involves studying areas such as obesity, metabolism, microbiome, diabetes, cardiovascular health, and women's health, with particular attention to disease prevention, nutrition support, and lifestyle medicine.
Research topics
- Medicine
- Biology
- Environmental health
- Endocrinology
- Sociology
- Gerontology
- Chemistry
- Gynecology
- Food science
- Demography
- Physiology
- Obstetrics
Selected publications
ISEE Conference Abstracts · 2024
- Medicine
- Obstetrics
- Gerontology
MARIJUANA SMOKING AND OVARIAN RESERVE AMONG FEMALES PRESENTING TO AN ACADEMIC FERTILITY CENTER
Fertility and Sterility · 2024
Senior authorCorresponding- Sociology
- Medicine
- Gynecology
Human Reproduction · 2022
Senior authorCorresponding- Medicine
- Physiology
- Biology
Abstract Study question Are soy food and isoflavone intakes associated with ovarian reserve as measured by antral follicle count (AFC)? Summary answer Within the observed range of intake, soy food or isoflavone consumptions are not associated with AFC. What is known already Phytoestrogens are structurally similar to 17β-estradiol, and bind to ER-α and ER-β in vitro resulting in weak estrogenic activity. Previous work in ruminants, felines and rodents has shown that exposure to phytoestrogens can have major adverse impacts on reproduction. However, findings of studies in humans suggest that soy foods and soy phytoestrogens may not have major deleterious impacts on reproductive hormone levels or reproductive outcomes, and could even be beneficial in couples undergoing infertility treatment. Study design, size, duration Women presenting to a large academic fertility center between April 2007 and December 2019 were invited to participate in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study, a prospective cohort study. Intake of 15 soy-based foods during the previous three months was obtained at baseline and intake of soy phytoestrogens was estimated from these reports. AFC was assessed with transvaginal ultrasound performed as part of diagnostic evaluation for infertility. Participants/materials, setting, methods We included 667 women who reported their soy food intake and had an AFC assessment. Women were divided in groups of increasing soy food and soy isoflavone intake with women who reported not consuming soy-based foods serving as the reference group. We evaluated the association of soy foods and soy isoflavones intake with AFC using Poisson regression models adjusting for confounders. Analyses were also stratified by age, BMI, and smoking status. Main results and the role of chance Women had median baseline age of 35.0 years and BMI of 23.4 kg/m2. Mean (range) intake of soy foods was 0.1 (0-7.4) servings/day, and mean (range) intake of isoflavones was 6 (0-166) mg/day, which is comparable to that of women in the general population of the USA. Intakes of soy foods or isoflavones were not related to AFC. The median (IQR) AFC for women who did not consume soy foods and women in the highest category of soy intake (>0.45 servings/day, median 0.88 servings/day) were 12 (9, 18) and 13 (9, 19). After adjustment for potential confounders, the mean difference in AFC between women in the highest category of soy intake and women who did not consume soy was -0.5% (-6.6%, 6.1%). Soy food intake remained unrelated to AFC when intake was categorized using different cutoff values when intake was modeled as a continuous variable when departures from a linear association were considered, and when we excluded from analysis 76 women whose AFC ultrasound scan was performed before they completed the diet assessment. Soy intake was also unrelated to AFC within categories of age, BMI and smoking status. Findings for soy isoflavones mirrored those for soy-food intake. Limitations, reasons for caution Self-reported soy intake may have resulted in measurement error leading to attenuation of observed relations towards the null. Also, all participants were women presenting to a fertility center and therefore, findings may not be generalizable to women in the general population. Wider implications of the findings Our findings suggest soy food and isoflavone intakes within the ranges observed among women in the general population of the USA is unlikely to influence ovarian reserve in any meaningful way. Trial registration number Not applicable
Nature Human Behaviour · 2021 · 161 citations
- Biology
- Demography
- Genetics
Dietary patterns and PFAS plasma concentrations in childhood: Project Viva, USA
Environment International · 2021 · 64 citations
- Environmental health
- Medicine
BACKGROUND: Diet is thought to account for most adult human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Children are particularly vulnerable to adverse health effects of PFAS and may have different eating habits than adults. However, studies of dietary patterns and PFAS in children are limited. METHODS: We studied 548 Boston-area children with food frequency questionnaire data (89 food items) in early childhood (median age 3.3 years) and plasma concentrations of 6 PFAS quantified in mid-childhood (median age 7.7 years). We used univariate linear regression to examine associations between each food item and PFAS, accounting for multiple comparisons. We next used reduced rank regression (RRR) to estimate overall percent variation in PFAS explained by diet and identify dietary patterns most correlated with PFAS. All models were adjusted for race/ethnicity, maternal education, and household income. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) acetate (MeFOSAA) plasma concentrations were 17.8% (95% CI: 7.2, 29.5) and 17.0% (95% CI: 6.4, 28.7) higher per SD increment in intake of ice cream and soda, respectively. RRR identified 6 dietary patterns that together explained 18% variation in the plasma concentrations of the 6 PFAS, of which 50% was explained by a dietary pattern consisting of primarily packaged foods (including ice cream and soda) and fish. Children with higher intake of the packaged foods and fish dietary pattern had higher plasma concentrations of all PFAS, particularly MeFOSAA and PFOS. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis examined food intake in association with several PFAS in children and identified dietary determinants that may be sources of PFAS exposure or reflect correlated lifestyle or toxicokinetic factors. Further investigation may help inform measures to modify childhood PFAS exposure.
The Lancet Public Health · 2020 · 2291 citations
- Medicine
- Demography
- Family medicine
BACKGROUND: Data for front-line health-care workers and risk of COVID-19 are limited. We sought to assess risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers compared with the general community and the effect of personal protective equipment (PPE) on risk. METHODS: We did a prospective, observational cohort study in the UK and the USA of the general community, including front-line health-care workers, using self-reported data from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application (app) from March 24 (UK) and March 29 (USA) to April 23, 2020. Participants were voluntary users of the app and at first use provided information on demographic factors (including age, sex, race or ethnic background, height and weight, and occupation) and medical history, and subsequently reported any COVID-19 symptoms. We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of our primary outcome, which was a positive COVID-19 test. The COVID Symptom Study app is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04331509. FINDINGS: Among 2 035 395 community individuals and 99 795 front-line health-care workers, we recorded 5545 incident reports of a positive COVID-19 test over 34 435 272 person-days. Compared with the general community, front-line health-care workers were at increased risk for reporting a positive COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 11·61, 95% CI 10·93-12·33). To account for differences in testing frequency between front-line health-care workers and the general community and possible selection bias, an inverse probability-weighted model was used to adjust for the likelihood of receiving a COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 3·40, 95% CI 3·37-3·43). Secondary and post-hoc analyses suggested adequacy of PPE, clinical setting, and ethnic background were also important factors. INTERPRETATION: In the UK and the USA, risk of reporting a positive test for COVID-19 was increased among front-line health-care workers. Health-care systems should ensure adequate availability of PPE and develop additional strategies to protect health-care workers from COVID-19, particularly those from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds. Additional follow-up of these observational findings is needed. FUNDING: Zoe Global, Wellcome Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, National Institutes of Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Alzheimer's Society, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness.
Frequent coauthors
- 9 shared
Lidia Mínguez‐Alarcón
Harvard University
- 9 shared
Makiko Mitsunami
- 9 shared
Irene Souter
Massachusetts General Hospital
- 5 shared
Jennifer B. Ford
Harvard University
- 4 shared
Albert Salas‐Huetos
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- 4 shared
Mariel Arvizu
Harvard University
- 3 shared
Russ Hauser
- 2 shared
Myriam C. Afeiche
Nestlé (Switzerland)
Similar researchers at Harvard University
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Jorge Chavarro
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup