About

Daniel Y. Kim is a Professor of English and American Studies at Brown University. His primary research focuses on post-1945 U.S. literature, with particular emphasis on Asian American and African American traditions, Korean/American Studies, Ethnic Studies, Gender Studies, and the Cold War. He is the author of two significant books: 'Writing Manhood in Black and Yellow,' which examines literary representations of racialized masculinity in African-American and Asian-American contexts, and 'The Intimacies of Conflict,' which adopts a historical approach to explore how the Korean War reshaped domestic conceptions of race and the interracial dimensions of American empire. Kim's work often analyzes the intersection of race, gender, and sexuality within literary and cultural contexts, emphasizing how these modalities of identity influence modern subjectivity and cultural memory. He has contributed extensively to scholarly discourse through articles and edited volumes, and his research is supported by various fellowships and grants.

Research topics

• Medicine
• Computer science
• Artificial intelligence
• Internal medicine
• Radiology

Selected publications

• Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis

  JAMA Surgery · 2022 · 30 citations

  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Physical therapy

  Importance: For adults with appendicitis, several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that antibiotics are an effective alternative to appendectomy. However, it remains unknown how the characteristics of patients in such trials compare with those of patients who select their treatment and whether outcomes differ. Objective: To compare participants in the Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) randomized clinical trial (RCT) with a parallel cohort study of participants who declined randomization and self-selected treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CODA trial was conducted in 25 US medical centers. Participants were enrolled between May 3, 2016, and February 5, 2020; all participants were eligible for at least 1 year of follow-up, with all follow-up ending in 2021. The randomized cohort included 1094 adults with appendicitis; the self-selection cohort included patients who declined participation in the randomized group, of whom 253 selected appendectomy and 257 selected antibiotics. In this secondary analysis, characteristics and outcomes in both self-selection and randomized cohorts are described with an exploratory analysis of cohort status and receipt of appendectomy. Interventions: Appendectomy vs antibiotics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Characteristics among participants randomized to either appendectomy or antibiotics were compared with those of participants who selected their own treatment. Results: Clinical characteristics were similar across the self-selection cohort (510 patients; mean age, 35.8 years [95% CI, 34.5-37.1]; 218 female [43%; 95% CI, 39%-47%]) and the randomized group (1094 patients; mean age, 38.2 years [95% CI, 37.4-39.0]; 386 female [35%; 95% CI, 33%-38%]). Compared with the randomized group, those in the self-selection cohort were less often Spanish speaking (n = 99 [19%; 95% CI, 16%-23%] vs n = 336 [31%; 95% CI, 28%-34%]), reported more formal education (some college or more, n = 355 [72%; 95% CI, 68%-76%] vs n = 674 [63%; 95% CI, 60%-65%]), and more often had commercial insurance (n = 259 [53%; 95% CI, 48%-57%] vs n = 486 [45%; 95% CI, 42%-48%]). Most outcomes were similar between the self-selection and randomized cohorts. The number of patients undergoing appendectomy by 30 days was 38 (15.3%; 95% CI, 10.7%-19.7%) among those selecting antibiotics and 155 (19.2%; 95% CI, 15.9%-22.5%) in those who were randomized to antibiotics (difference, 3.9%; 95% CI, -1.7% to 9.5%). Differences in the rate of appendectomy were primarily observed in the non-appendicolith subgroup. Conclusions and Relevance: This secondary analysis of the CODA RCT found substantially similar outcomes across the randomized and self-selection cohorts, suggesting that the randomized trial results are generalizable to the community at large. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.

  DOI

• Patient Factors Associated With Appendectomy Within 30 Days of Initiating Antibiotic Treatment for Appendicitis

  JAMA Surgery · 2022 · 64 citations

  • Medicine
  • General surgery
  • Intensive care medicine

  IMPORTANCE: Use of antibiotics for the treatment of appendicitis is safe and has been found to be noninferior to appendectomy based on self-reported health status at 30 days. Identifying patient characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of appendectomy within 30 days in those who initiate antibiotics could support more individualized decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient factors associated with undergoing appendectomy within 30 days of initiating antibiotics for appendicitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study using data from the Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) randomized clinical trial, characteristics among patients who initiated antibiotics were compared between those who did and did not undergo appendectomy within 30 days. The study was conducted at 25 US medical centers; participants were enrolled between May 3, 2016, and February 5, 2020. A total of 1552 participants with acute appendicitis were randomized to antibiotics (776 participants) or appendectomy (776 participants). Data were analyzed from September 2020 to July 2021. EXPOSURES: Appendectomy vs antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Conditional logistic regression models were fit to estimate associations between specific patient factors and the odds of undergoing appendectomy within 30 days after initiating antibiotics. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding participants who underwent appendectomy within 30 days for nonclinical reasons. RESULTS: Of 776 participants initiating antibiotics (mean [SD] age, 38.3 [13.4] years; 286 [37%] women and 490 [63%] men), 735 participants had 30-day outcomes, including 154 participants (21%) who underwent appendectomy within 30 days. After adjustment for other factors, female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.31), radiographic finding of wider appendiceal diameter (OR per 1-mm increase, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.18), and presence of appendicolith (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.10) were associated with increased odds of undergoing appendectomy within 30 days. Characteristics that are often associated with increased risk of complications (eg, advanced age, comorbid conditions) and those clinicians often use to describe appendicitis severity (eg, fever: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.82-1.98) were not associated with odds of 30-day appendectomy. The sensitivity analysis limited to appendectomies performed for clinical reasons provided similar results regarding appendicolith (adjusted OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.49-3.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study found that presence of an appendicolith was associated with a nearly 2-fold increased risk of undergoing appendectomy within 30 days of initiating antibiotics. Clinical characteristics often used to describe severity of appendicitis were not associated with odds of 30-day appendectomy. This information may help guide more individualized decision-making for people with appendicitis.

  DOI

• Timing of Resumption of Anticoagulation After Polypectomy and Frequency of Post-procedural Complications: A Post-hoc Analysis

  Digestive Diseases and Sciences · 2022 · 3 citations

  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  PublisherDOI

• Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19

  Nature · 2021 · 975 citations

  • Immunology
  • Biology
  • Medicine
  DOI

• Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19

  Nature · 2020 · 2288 citations

  • Immunology
  • Biology
  • Medicine
  DOI

• Rapid dealiasing of undersampled, non‐Cartesian cardiac perfusion images using U‐net

  NMR in Biomedicine · 2020 · 41 citations

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

  ) and extensive myocardial coverage (6-8 slices per heartbeat). A major disadvantage of CS is its relatively lengthy processing time (~8 min per slice with 64 frames using a graphics processing unit), thereby making it impractical for clinical translation. The purpose of this study was to implement and test whether an image reconstruction pipeline including a neural network is capable of reconstructing 6.4-fold accelerated, non-Cartesian (radial) cardiac perfusion k-space data at least 10 times faster than CS, without significant loss in image quality. We implemented a 3D (2D + time) U-Net and trained it with 132 2D + time datasets (coil combined, zero filled as input; CS reconstruction as reference) with 64 time frames from 28 patients (8448 2D images in total). For testing, we used 56 2D + time coil-combined, zero-filled datasets (3584 2D images in total) from 12 different patients as input to our trained U-Net, and compared the resulting images with CS reconstructed images using quantitative metrics of image quality and visual scores (conspicuity of wall enhancement, noise, artifacts; each score ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best), with 3 defined as clinically acceptable) evaluated by readers. Including pre- and post-processing steps, compared with CS, U-Net significantly reduced the reconstruction time by 14.4-fold (32.1 ± 1.4 s for U-Net versus 461.3 ± 16.9 s for CS, p < 0.001), while maintaining high data fidelity (structural similarity index = 0.914 ± 0.023, normalized root mean square error = 1.7 ± 0.3%, identical mean edge sharpness of 1.2 mm). The median visual summed score was not significantly different (p = 0.053) between CS (14; interquartile range (IQR) = 0.5) and U-Net (12; IQR = 0.5). This study shows that the proposed pipeline with a U-Net is capable of reconstructing 6.4-fold accelerated, non-Cartesian cardiac perfusion k-space data 14.4 times faster than CS, without significant loss in data fidelity or image quality.

  DOI

• Platelet-Rich Plasma Content of Active Spinal Cord Injured Patients

  American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2020 · 2 citations

  • Medicine
  • Anesthesia
  • Internal medicine

  OBJECTIVE: Platelet-rich plasma has potential uses for patients with spinal cord injuries. However, no study has quantified the cellular and growth factor content of platelet-rich plasma in this population. This study aimed to analyze (1) platelet-rich plasma content of spinal cord injury subjects and (2) the effect of high-intensity interval exercise on their platelet-rich plasma. DESIGN: Ten spinal cord injury patients and 10 controls were enrolled. At rest, platelet-rich plasma was created from both groups. The spinal cord injury group then performed high-intensity interval exercise and underwent a second blood draw to create post-high-intensity interval exercise platelet-rich plasma. Complete blood counts and growth factor analysis (via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) was performed on all platelet-rich plasma. RESULTS: The spinal cord injury group had lower platelets (305,700 ± 85,697/μl vs 380,800 ± 57,301/μl, P = 0.015) and transforming growth factor β (12.84 ± 1.58 vs 14.33 ± 0.63 ng/ml, P = 0.023). Four minutes of high-intensity interval exercise increased the platelets (305,700 ± 85,697/μl to 399,200 ± 96,251/μl, P = 0.004), leukocytes (906 ± 930 vs 2504 ± 3765/μl, P = 0.002) and transforming growth factor β (12.84 ± 1.58 to 14.28 ± 1.21 ng/ml, P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord injury patients have fewer platelets and transforming growth factor β in their platelet-rich plasma at baseline compared with controls. Exercise increased platelet, leukocyte, and transforming growth factor β yield, compensating for the baseline deficits.

  PublisherDOI

• Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes

  Nature · 2020 · 1496 citations

  • Medicine
  • Biology
  • Immunology
  DOI

• Accelerated Wideband Myocardial Perfusion Pulse Sequence with Compressed Sensing Reconstruction for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification in Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device

  Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging · 2020 · 14 citations

  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Cardiology

  PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated wideband cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it can produce diagnostically acceptable image quality and whether it can be used to reliably quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fivefold-accelerated wideband perfusion pulse sequence was developed using compressed sensing to sample one arterial input function plane and three myocardial perfusion (MP) planes per heartbeat in patients with a CIED with heart rates as high as 102 beats per minute. Resting perfusion scans were performed in 10 patients with a CIED and in 10 patients with no device as a control group. Two clinical readers compared the resulting images and retrospective images of the 10 patients with a CIED, which were obtained by using a previously described twofold-accelerated wideband perfusion pulse sequence with temporal generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition. Summed visual score (SVS) was defined as the sum of conspicuity, artifact, and noise scores individually ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Resting MBF in the remote zones was quantified using Fermi deconvolution. RESULTS: = .27) between patients with a CIED (1.1 mL/min/g; median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 52.5%) and patients with no device (1.3 mL/min/g; median LVEF, 64.0%). Mean MBF values were consistent with those (mean resting MBF range, 1.0-1.2 mL/min/g) reported by two prior state-of-the-art cardiac perfusion MRI studies. CONCLUSION: © RSNA, 2020.

  DOI

Frequent coauthors

• Liane L. Livi

  Brown University

  56 shared

• Rafael D. González-Cruz

  Providence College

  35 shared

• Eric M. Morrow

  Bradley Hospital

  24 shared

• Rachel M. McLaughlin

  Brown University

  24 shared

• Cristina López-Fagundo

  University of Zurich

  24 shared

• Molly E. Boutin

  National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

  23 shared

• Christian Franck

  University of Wisconsin–Madison

  23 shared

• Jessica L. Sevetson

  University of California, Santa Cruz

  22 shared

Awards & honors

• Norman Freehling Visiting Fellowship, the Institute for the…
• Presidential Faculty Research Fellowship, Pembroke Center, B…
• National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Stipend (2013)
• Cogut Humanities Center Faculty Fellowship, Brown University…
• Henry Merritt Wriston Faculty Fellowship, Brown University (…

Similar researchers at Brown University

• Shouheng Sunh-193
• Lai-Sheng Wangh-168
• Huajian Gaoh-156
• Christopher Schmidh-151
• Karen Furieh-148