Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Robert C Koons

Robert C Koons

· Professor

University of Texas at Austin · Philosophy

Active 1986–2026

h-index15
Citations1.0k
Papers12520 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Robert C Koons — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Robert C. Koons is a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin, where he has taught for 35 years. He holds degrees from Michigan State, Oxford (M.A.), and UCLA (Ph.D.). His academic specialization lies in metaphysics and philosophical logic, with particular interests in philosophical theology and the foundations of both science and ethics. Koons is the author or co-author of five books, including Realism Regained and The Atlas of Reality: A Comprehensive Guide to Metaphysics. He has also co-edited several collections addressing topics such as materialism, Neo-Aristotelian perspectives on contemporary science, and metaphysics and the philosophy of nature. Recently, Koons has focused on an Aristotelian interpretation of quantum theory, defending and articulating Thomism in contemporary terms, and developing arguments for classical theism. His forthcoming works include titles on Thomas Aquinas's philosophy of nature and classical theism. Koons's scholarship reflects a deep engagement with Aristotelian and Thomist philosophy, as well as a commitment to exploring the philosophical foundations of science and religion.

Research topics

  • Epistemology
  • Philosophy
  • Physics
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Theology
  • Theoretical physics

Selected publications

  • Skepticism and the principle of sufficient reason

    Philosophical Studies · 2020 · 28 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract The Principle of Sufficient Reason must be justified dialectically: by showing the disastrous consequences of denying it. We formulate a version of the Principle that is restricted to basic natural facts, which entails the obtaining of at least one supernatural fact. Denying this principle results in extreme empirical skepticism. We consider six current theories of empirical knowledge, showing that on each account we cannot know that we have empirical knowledge unless we all have a prio…

  • Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature

    Routledge eBooks · 2021 · 18 citations

  • Powers ontology and the quantum revolution

    European Journal for Philosophy of Science · 2020 · 9 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract An Aristotelian philosophy of nature rejects the modern prejudice in favor of the microscopic, a rejection that is crucial if we are to penetrate the mysteries of the quantum world. I defend an Aristotelian model by drawing on both quantum chemistry and recent work on the measurement problem. By building on the work of Hans Primas, using the distinction between quantum and classical properties that emerges in quantum chemistry at the thermodynamic or continuum limit, I develop a new ver…

  • Prime Matter and the Quantum Wavefunction

    Ancient Philosophy Today · 2024-04-01 · 7 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Prime matter plays an indispensable role in Aristotle’s philosophy, enabling him to avoid the pitfalls of both naïve Platonism and nominalism. Prime matter is best thought of as a kind of infinitely divisible and atomless bare particularity, grounding the distinctness of distinct members of the same species. Such bare particularity is needed in symmetrical situations, like a world consisting of indistinguishable Max Black spheres. Bare particularity is especially important in modern physics, giv…

  • The Entanglement Problem for Psychological Hylomorphism

    Res Philosophica · 2025-01-01 · 3 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    The theory of psychological hylomorphism has recently been advanced by David Charles as a viable alternative to physicalist and dualist theories of mind. According to Charles, a human or animal is a psycho-physical whole whose mental and physical properties are defined with reference to the whole. This is because it is a hylomorphic composite of matter and form, where the form contains the material principles of the composite in its definition. In this paper, we raise a difficulty concerning the…

Frequent coauthors

Education

  • Ph.D., Philosophy

    University of California Los Angeles College of Letters and Science

    1987
  • M.A., Philosophy and Theology

    University of Oxford

    1981

Similar researchers at University of Texas at Austin

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Robert C Koons

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup