Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Keith Gubbins

Keith Gubbins

Verified

North Carolina State University · Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Active 1960–2023

h-index97
Citations45.4k
Papers57911 last 5y
Funding$4.0M
See your match with Keith Gubbins — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Physics
  • Thermodynamics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Mathematics
  • Classical mechanics
  • Materials science
  • Mechanics
  • Theoretical physics
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Chemistry
  • Statistical physics
  • Geometry
  • Philosophy
  • Mathematical analysis

Selected publications

  • A perspective on the microscopic pressure (stress) tensor: History, current understanding, and future challenges

    The Journal of Chemical Physics · 2023 · 65 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Physics

    The pressure tensor (equivalent to the negative stress tensor) at both microscopic and macroscopic levels is fundamental to many aspects of engineering and science, including fluid dynamics, solid mechanics, biophysics, and thermodynamics. In this Perspective, we review methods to calculate the microscopic pressure tensor. Connections between different pressure forms for equilibrium and nonequilibrium systems are established. We also point out several challenges in the field, including the historical controversies over the definition of the microscopic pressure tensor; the difficulties with many-body and long-range potentials; the insufficiency of software and computational tools; and the lack of experimental routes to probe the pressure tensor at the nanoscale. Possible future directions are suggested.

  • The Young–Laplace equation for a solid–liquid interface

    The Journal of Chemical Physics · 2020 · 74 citations

    • Thermodynamics
    • Materials science
    • Chemistry

    The application of the Young-Laplace equation to a solid-liquid interface is considered. Computer simulations show that the pressure inside a solid cluster of hard spheres is smaller than the external pressure of the liquid (both for small and large clusters). This would suggest a negative value for the interfacial free energy. We show that in a Gibbsian description of the thermodynamics of a curved solid-liquid interface in equilibrium, the choice of the thermodynamic (rather than mechanical) pressure is required, as suggested by Tolman for the liquid-gas scenario. With this definition, the interfacial free energy is positive, and the values obtained are in excellent agreement with previous results from nucleation studies. Although, for a curved fluid-fluid interface, there is no distinction between mechanical and thermal pressures (for a sufficiently large inner phase), in the solid-liquid interface, they do not coincide, as hypothesized by Gibbs.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Benoît Coasne

    Institut Laue-Langevin

    113 shared
  • Małgorzata Śliwińska-Bartkowiak

    104 shared
  • Joanna Czwartos

    Military University of Technology in Warsaw

    44 shared
  • C.G. Gray

    University of Guelph

    43 shared
  • Erik E. Santiso

    North Carolina State University

    34 shared
  • Marco Buongiorno Nardelli

    33 shared
  • Erich A. Müller

    Imperial College London

    32 shared
  • Jorge Pikunic

    29 shared

Similar researchers at North Carolina State University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Keith Gubbins

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup