Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Joseph Simmons

Joseph Simmons

· Professor of Operations, Information and Decisions

University of Pennsylvania · Operations and Information Management

Active 1972–2026

h-index35
Citations16.0k
Papers11218 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Joseph Simmons — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Joseph Simmons is the Dorothy Silberberg Professor of Applied Statistics and a Professor of Operations, Information, and Decisions at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. His research primarily investigates the psychology of judgment and decision-making, focusing on understanding and addressing errors and biases that affect people's judgments, predictions, and choices. His work explores topics such as advice taking, algorithm aversion, anchoring effects, consumer rating systems, forecasting biases, the illusion of control, intuitive biases, optimistic biases, outcome bias, and the wisdom of crowds. In addition to his psychological research, Simmons is renowned for his contributions to research methods. Alongside colleagues Leif Nelson and Uri Simonsohn, he has dedicated over 16 years to identifying and remedying research practices that contribute to false-positive findings and a perverse incentive structure in scientific publishing. His efforts include exposing p-hacking, developing tools like the p-curve for assessing evidential value, creating pre-registration platforms used by thousands of researchers, and establishing websites for posting research materials and data. Simmons is also a co-founder of the Wharton Credibility Lab, which provides online platforms to enhance research credibility. His work aims to improve the reliability and integrity of scientific research through systematic replication, transparency, and methodological innovation.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Security
  • Information Retrieval
  • Political Science
  • Statistics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medicine
  • Data science

Selected publications

  • Specification curve analysis

    Nature Human Behaviour · 2020-07-27 · 559 citations

    article
  • Above averaging in literature reviews

    Nature Reviews Psychology · 2022 · 51 citations

  • Does Choice Cause an Illusion of Control?

    Psychological Science · 2021-01-05 · 32 citations

    articleSenior author

    Previous research suggests that choice causes an illusion of control—that it makes people feel more likely to achieve preferable outcomes, even when they are selecting among options that are functionally identical (e.g., lottery tickets with an identical chance of winning). This research has been widely accepted as evidence that choice can have significant welfare effects, even when it confers no actual control. In this article, we report the results of 17 experiments that examined whether choic…

  • Looking our limitations in the eye: A call for more thorough and honest reporting of study limitations

    Social and Personality Psychology Compass · 2024-07-01 · 12 citations

    articleOpen access

    Abstract The replication crisis and subsequent credibility revolution in psychology have highlighted many suboptimal research practices such as p ‐hacking, overgeneralizing, and a lack of transparency. These practices may have been employed reflexively but upon reflection, they are hard to defend. We suggest that current practices for reporting and discussing study limitations are another example of an area where there is much room for improvement. In this article, we call for more rigorous repo…

  • The Psychology of Second Guesses: Implications for the Wisdom of the Inner Crowd

    Management Science · 2021-03-23 · 11 citations

    articleSenior author

    Prior research suggests that averaging two guesses from the same person can improve quantitative judgments, a phenomenon known as the “wisdom of the inner crowd.” In this article, we find that this effect hinges on whether people explicitly decide in which direction their first guess had erred before making their second guess. In nine studies (N = 8,465), we found that asking people to explicitly indicate whether their first guess was too high or too low before making their second guess made peo…

Frequent coauthors

Awards & honors

  • Wharton Credibility Lab (co-founder)

Similar researchers at University of Pennsylvania

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Joseph Simmons

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup