Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Helena Carvalho

· Associate ProfessorVerified

Virginia Tech · Anatomy and Neurobiology

Active 1982–2023

h-index5
Citations243
Papers356 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Helena Carvalho — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine
  • Mathematics education
  • Medical education
  • Internal medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • Wright table of the cardiac cycle: Expanding application to clinical settings

    Physiology · 2023

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Medicine
    • Cardiology

    Purpose: Introduce a clinical variant of the Wright table both to teach at the upper undergraduate/graduate level and to model pathologies at the graduate/residency level of clinical training. Introduction:The cardiac cycle is taught in cardiovascular units and used by health professionals. The original Wright table (1) models this process’ events using four flow phases and four compartments. Its use of pressures in each compartment to drive blood from veins to arteries, with valve openings, closings, and heart sounds, was applied at the preclinical level. Improvements in the Wright table (2) include those for a right heart, a left heart with pulmonary wedge pressures, and some comparisons (e.g., right-vs-left heart). Preclinical medical students used these to model valvular pathologies (3). We hypothesized that if the Wright table included isovolumetric phases, it could be a clinical instrument to be used by cardiologists to help solidify key concepts necessary to understand pathology. Methods:A variant of this table was developed using five columns of “compartments” to model the cardiac cycle in the left heart: pulmonary veins, left atrium, left ventricle, aorta, and a pulmonary wedges concept that illustrates when blood backs up into pulmonary capillaries. The right heart’s includes a jugular venous compartment. This variant was pilot-demonstrated via zoom to a group of cardiologists to explore its potential use as an instrument to model pathologies. Results:The clinical variant of the Wright table displays all seven phases of the cardiac cycle typically depicted in the Wiggers diagram. The first phase, 1) rapid ventricular filling, begins when the A-V valve opens. This is followed by 2) slow ventricular filling [a.k.a. diastasis], 3) active ventricular filling during atrial systole, 4) isovolumetric contraction, 5) rapid ventricular ejection, 6) slow ventricular ejection [and protodiastole], and 7) isovolumetric relaxation. Each phase occupies one row from 1) top to 7) bottom, resulting in a 5-compartment, 7-phase (5x7) table of the cardiac cycle. The clinical variant of the Wright table puts all three ventricular filling phases together at the top prior to ventricular emptying. It introduces a system for pathophysiological modeling for both clinical professionals and advanced medical students. The model is constructed in a way that allows for a variety of comparisons including right-vs-left heart; physiological vs. pathological; early vs. late progression of a pathological condition; and earlier-to-later times. It also can display atrial and/or septal defects and their pathological effects within the heart. Conclusion:We present a clinical variant of the Wright table that was successfully tested with cardiologists. This all-phase variant shows its potential as a tool to deepen physiological and pathophysiological insight on the cardiac cycle to both advanced medical students and clinical professionals in a cardiology context. Funding: None This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

  • Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science

    Medical Science Educator · 2021 · 6 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Mathematics education
    • Medical education
    • Psychology

    INTRODUCTION: Conceptions of learning and teaching refer to what faculty think about teaching effectiveness. Approaches to teaching refer to the methods they use to teach. Both conceptions and approaches range from student-centered/learning-focused (active learner engagement) to teaching-centered/content-focused (passive learner engagement). This study explored how faculty teaching experience influenced faculty conceptions and their approaches to teaching. The authors hypothesized that more experienced educators appreciate and apply active learning approaches. METHODS: The authors used a cross-sectional survey to collect anonymous data from the Basic Science faculty at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (VTCSOM). The survey included the Conceptions of Learning and Teaching scale (COLT; Jacobs et al. 2012) and demographic information. They assessed instrument reliability with Cronbach's alpha and examined relationships between variables with correlation and chi-square and group differences with ANOVA. RESULTS: = 0.022). However, 83% (39/50) reported using both traditional lectures and active approaches. DISCUSSION: Faculty conceptions about teaching showed appreciation for active learning, but a tendency to use traditional teaching methods interspersed with student-centered ones. Teaching experience was not related to faculty conceptions but was related to their teaching approaches. The amount of time dedicated to teaching was related to the appreciation of active learning, and young teachers were more student-oriented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4.

Frequent coauthors

  • Zane Giffen

    University of Toledo Medical Center

    8 shared
  • Saleem Ahmed

    5 shared
  • Margarite McCandless

    5 shared
  • Crystal A. West

    Appalachian State University

    5 shared
  • Renata N. Aranha

    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

    4 shared
  • Andrew Yue-Lin Li

    Carilion Clinic

    4 shared
  • Andrew Li

    Johns Hopkins Medicine

    4 shared
  • Brian William Connor

    Carilion Clinic

    4 shared

Similar researchers at Virginia Tech

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Helena Carvalho

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup