Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Eric Turkheimer

Eric Turkheimer

University of Virginia · Psychology and Neuroscience

Active 1983–2026

h-index62
Citations17.6k
Papers26141 last 5y
Funding$1.3M

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Eric Turkheimer — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Eric Turkheimer is the Hugh Scott Hamilton Professor of Psychology at the University of Virginia. His research focuses on how interactions between genes and environments shape the development of human behavior. His lab studies various aspects of behavior, with particular interest in issues related to family life, including marriage, divorce, and parenting. Additionally, Turkheimer's work explores the development of human intelligence and personality, especially in understanding the processes that lead siblings to become different from each other over time. He also develops methods for richer and more individualized assessments of personality, controlling for the role of self-esteem when individuals describe their own personality.

Research topics

  • Sociology
  • Genetics
  • Biology
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Ecology
  • Geography
  • Social psychology
  • Demography
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility

    The Hastings Center Report · 2023 · 66 citations

    In this consensus report by a diverse group of academics who conduct and/or are concerned about social and behavioral genomics (SBG) research, the authors recount the often-ugly history of scientific attempts to understand the genetic contributions to human behaviors and social outcomes. They then describe what the current science-including genomewide association studies and polygenic indexes-can and cannot tell us, as well as its risks and potential benefits. They conclude with a discussion of…

  • Three legs of the missing heritability problem

    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · 2022-05-06 · 54 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author
  • Genetic and environmental influences on human height from infancy through adulthood at different levels of parental education

    Scientific Reports · 2020 · 42 citations

    Genetic factors explain a major proportion of human height variation, but differences in mean stature have also been found between socio-economic categories suggesting a possible effect of environment. By utilizing a classical twin design which allows decomposing the variation of height into genetic and environmental components, we tested the hypothesis that environmental variation in height is greater in offspring of lower educated parents. Twin data from 29 cohorts including 65,978 complete tw…

  • Understanding the Nature‒Nurture Debate

    Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2024-11-07 · 9 citations

    book1st authorCorresponding

    There are arguably few areas of science more fiercely contested than the question of what makes us who we are. Are we products of our environments or our genes? Is nature the governing force behind our behaviour or is it nurture? While it is now widely agreed that it is a mixture of both, discussions continue as to which is the dominant influence. This unique volume presents a clear explanation of heritability, the ongoing nature versus nurture debate and the evidence that is currently available…

  • How to Diagnose Abhorrent Science

    The Hastings Center Report · 2024-11-01 · 8 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    What makes certain scientific research controversial? And when does scientific research go beyond being merely controversial to be something far worse? We propose a diagnostic framework for distinguishing between scientific research that is merely controversial and that which is abhorrent. Our framework places research projects along two axes of a value-harm map. Most research, fortunately, is both valuable and harmless. However, research may be controversial if it is either valuable but harmful…

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Glen E. Duncan

    Washington State University Spokane

    60 shared
  • Siny Tsang

    University of Virginia

    49 shared
  • Ally R. Avery

    Washington State University Spokane

    46 shared
  • Nathaniel F. Watson

    University of Washington

    43 shared
  • Thomas F. Oltmanns

    Washington University in St. Louis

    40 shared
  • Brian M. D’Onofrio

    Indiana University Bloomington

    37 shared
  • Robert E. Emery

    University of Virginia

    32 shared
  • Christopher R. Beam

    University of Southern California

    30 shared

Labs

  • Turkheimer LabPI

Similar researchers at University of Virginia

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Eric Turkheimer

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup