Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Duncan Simester

Duncan Simester

· NTU Professor of Marketing

Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Marketing

Active 1990–2025

h-index43
Citations6.9k
Papers11711 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Duncan Simester — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Duncan Simester is a Professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management where he holds the NTU Chair in Management Science and serves as the Chair of the MIT Evening MBA Task Force. He is an expert on how economics and artificial intelligence can contribute to the understanding and practice of marketing and strategy. His work is widely published in the academic literature, often relying on industry participation and large-scale field experiments conducted with cooperating firms. Prior to joining MIT, Duncan was a professor at the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business. He is also a qualified lawyer and a member of the bar in New Zealand. Duncan holds a PhD from MIT and has received notable honors including the 2020 Weitz-Winer-O’Dell Award from the American Marketing Association and the 2022 INFORMS Society for Marketing Science Fellow Award, recognizing his significant contributions to marketing research, theory, methodology, and practice.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Management science
  • Computer Security
  • Political Science
  • Mathematics
  • Marketing
  • Process management
  • Monetary economics

Selected publications

  • Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice

    The Journal of Finance · 2022 · 181 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    ABSTRACT Using proprietary financial data on millions of households, we show that likely‐Republicans increased the equity share and market beta of their portfolios following the 2016 presidential election, while likely‐Democrats rebalanced into safe assets. We provide evidence that this behavior was driven by investors interpreting public information based on different models of the world. We use detailed controls to rule out the main nonbelief‐based channels such as income hedging needs, prefer…

  • Targeting Prospective Customers: Robustness of Machine-Learning Methods to Typical Data Challenges

    Management Science · 2019-11-15 · 131 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    We investigate how firms can use the results of field experiments to optimize the targeting of promotions when prospecting for new customers. We evaluate seven widely used machine-learning methods using a series of two large-scale field experiments. The first field experiment generates a common pool of training data for each of the seven methods. We then validate the seven optimized policies provided by each method together with uniform benchmark policies in a second field experiment. The findin…

  • Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice

    National Bureau of Economic Research · 2018-09-01 · 88 citations

    reportSenior author

    Using proprietary portfolio data on millions of households, we show that (likely) Republicans increase the equity share and market beta of their portfolios following the 2016 presidential election, while (likely) Democrats rebalance into safe assets.We provide evidence that this behavior is driven by investors interpreting public information using different models of the world, by ruling out the main non-belief-based channels (like income hedging needs, preferences, local economic exposure) usin…

  • Informational rigidities and the stickiness of temporary Sales

    Journal of Monetary Economics · 2017-06-22 · 88 citations

    articleOpen access
  • Efficiently Evaluating Targeting Policies: Improving on Champion vs. Challenger Experiments

    Management Science · 2020 · 55 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Champion versus challenger field experiments are widely used to compare the performance of different targeting policies. These experiments randomly assign customers to receive marketing actions recommended by either the existing (champion) policy or the new (challenger) policy, and then compare the aggregate outcomes. We recommend an alternative experimental design and propose an alternative estimation approach to improve the evaluation of targeting policies. The recommended experimental design…

Frequent coauthors

Awards & honors

  • 2020 Weitz-Winer-O’Dell Award from the American Marketing As…
  • 2022 INFORMS Society for Marketing Science (ISMS) Fellow Awa…

Similar researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Duncan Simester

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup