Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Daniel Hopkins

Daniel Hopkins

· political science / CIS Julie and Martin Franklin Presidential Professor of Political Science

University of Pennsylvania · Computer Science

Active 1993–2026

h-index40
Citations13.2k
Papers16656 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Daniel Hopkins — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Daniel Hopkins is a political scientist at the University of Pennsylvania whose research centers on American politics and the politics of select other democracies. His work places special emphasis on racial and ethnic politics, state and local politics, political behavior, and research methods. He holds the formal title of Julie and Martin Franklin Presidential Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania and has secondary appointments at the School of Engineering and Applied Science as well as the Annenberg School for Communication. In addition to his academic roles, he assists with the coordination of the Philadelphia Behavioral Science Initiative. From 2014 until 2025, he was an occasional writer for FiveThirtyEight. His academic papers, curriculum vitae, and various professional profiles are publicly accessible through multiple online platforms.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology
  • Statistics
  • Engineering
  • Data science
  • Management science
  • Political Science
  • Mathematics
  • Gender studies

Selected publications

  • Conjoint Survey Experiments

    Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2021 · 225 citations

    Conjoint survey experiments have become a popular method for analyzing multidimensional preferences in political science. If properly implemented, conjoint experiments can obtain reliable measures of multidimensional preferences and estimate causal effects of multiple attributes on hypothetical choices or evaluations. This chapter provides an accessible overview of the methodology for designing, implementing, and analyzing conjoint survey experiments. Specically, we begin by detailing a new subs…

  • Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Election Outcomes: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect

    Political Analysis · 2022 · 113 citations

    Abstract Political scientists have increasingly deployed conjoint survey experiments to understand multidimensional choices in various settings. In this paper, we show that the average marginal component effect (AMCE) constitutes an aggregation of individual-level preferences that is meaningful both theoretically and empirically. First, extending previous results to allow for arbitrary randomization distributions, we show how the AMCE represents a summary of voters’ multidimensional preferences…

  • The Rise of Trump, The Fall of Prejudice? Tracking White Americans’ Racial Attitudes Via A Panel Survey, 2008–2018

    Public Opinion Quarterly · 2020 · 84 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract In his campaign and first few years in office, Donald Trump consistently defied contemporary norms by using explicit, negative rhetoric targeting ethnic/racial minorities. Did this rhetoric lead White Americans to express more or less prejudiced views of African Americans or Hispanics, whether through changing norms around racial prejudice or other mechanisms? We assess that question using a thirteen-wave panel conducted with a population-based sample of Americans between 2008 and 2018.…

  • The rise of and demand for identity‐oriented media coverage

    American Journal of Political Science · 2024-07-01 · 13 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract While some assert that social identities have become more salient in American media coverage, existing evidence is largely anecdotal. An increased emphasis on social identities has important political implications, including for polarization and representation. We first document the rising salience of different social identities using natural language processing tools to analyze all tweets from 19 media outlets (2008–2021) alongside 553,078 URLs shared on Facebook. We then examine one p…

  • Unsubscribed and undemanding: Partisanship and the minimal effects of a field experiment encouraging local news consumption

    American Journal of Political Science · 2024-03-19 · 13 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract Local newspapers convey extensive subnational political information but have dwindling audiences. In a nationalized and polarized information environment, can online interventions increase state/local news consumption and with what effects? We explore this question via a preregistered experiment randomizing Pennsylvania residents ( n = 5059) to staggered interventions encouraging news consumption from leading state newspapers. A total of 2529 individuals were offered free online subscri…

Frequent coauthors

  • Monica McDermott

    Arizona State University

    51 shared
  • Rafaela Dancygier

    Princeton University

    50 shared
  • William Kandel

    49 shared
  • Jeff Popke

    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    49 shared
  • Jennifer Darrah

    University of Kansas

    49 shared
  • Julia Preston

    Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

    49 shared
  • John Mollenkopf

    49 shared
  • Laura López‐Sanders

    49 shared

Awards & honors

  • Phillip E. Converse Book Award for The Increasingly United S…
  • Best Paper with a Pre-registration Award, Journal of Experim…
  • American Political Science Association Citizenship and Migra…
  • Political Research Quarterly Outstanding Reviewer Award (201…
  • Society of Political Methodology’s Miller Prize for the best…

Similar researchers at University of Pennsylvania

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Daniel Hopkins

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup