Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Audun Dahl

Audun Dahl

· Associate Professor

Cornell University · Nutrition

Active 2002–2026

h-index26
Citations2.4k
Papers9236 last 5y
Funding$154k

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Audun Dahl — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Audun Dahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Cornell University. His research focuses on the development of morality across the lifespan. He investigates how individuals encounter morally relevant events from infancy to old age, including helping or harming others and witnessing moral actions in various social contexts. His work explores how moral reasoning, judgment, feelings, and actions evolve through everyday social interactions, starting in early childhood. Dahl's Developmental Moral Psychology Lab employs a variety of methods such as laboratory experiments, naturalistic observations, structured interviews, and surveys to study infants, children, adolescents, and adults from different communities. His research includes examining how infants begin to help and harm others and how adults form judgments about complex issues like academic integrity and moral dilemmas. Through these approaches, Dahl aims to understand both the diversity and unity of human morality.

Research topics

  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Political Science
  • Law

Selected publications

  • What We Do When We Define Morality (and Why We Need to Do It)

    Psychological Inquiry · 2023-04-03 · 35 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Psychological research on morality relies on definitions of morality. Yet the various definitions often go unstated. When unstated definitions diverge, theoretical disagreements become intractable, as theories that purport to explain “morality” actually talk about very different things. This article argues that we need to define morality and considers four common ways of doing so: The linguistic, the functionalist, the evaluating, and the normative. Each has encountered difficulties. To surmount…

  • A Canary Alive: What Cheating Reveals about Morality and Its Development

    Human Development · 2023-10-19 · 8 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Reports of academic cheating trigger fears of moral decay. Cheating looks like a dying canary in the coal mine of morality. But this diagnosis assumes that those who cheat lack, or turn off, any genuine moral concerns with honesty and integrity. This article proposes an alternative perspective on cheating and dishonesty. We propose that cheating results from (1) misperceptions of what constitutes cheating, (2) evaluations that cheating or lying is okay under exceptional circumstances, and (3) pr…

  • Working across religions, cultures, settings, and development: Protocol for wave 2 data collection with children and parents by the developing belief network

    PLoS ONE · 2025-09-05 · 2 citations

    articleOpen accessCorresponding

    The Developing Belief Network is a global research collaborative studying religious development in diverse social-cultural settings, with a focus on the intersection of cognitive mechanisms and cultural beliefs and practices in early and middle childhood. The current manuscript describes the study protocol for the network's second wave of data collection, which aims to further explore the development and diversity of religious cognition and behavior using a multi-time point approach. This protoc…

  • The centrality of reasoning in moral judgments: First- and third-party evaluations of cheating

    Judgment and Decision Making · 2024-01-01 · 2 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Abstract What role does reasoning about moral principles play in people’s judgments about what is right or wrong? According to one view, reasoning usually plays little role. People tend to do what suits their self-interests and concoct moral reasons afterward to justify their own behavior. Thus, in this view, people are far more forgiving of their own violations than of others’ violations. According to a contrasting view, principled reasoning generally guides judgments and decisions about our ow…

  • Six and a Half Lessons From Moral Psychology for Moral Education

    2024-06-20 · 2 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Moral education relies on ideas about how morality works and develops. This chapter synthesizes lessons for moral education from recent research on the psychology and development of morality. The six first lessons are: (1) To study morality, we need to define it. (2) Neither innate nor learned, morality is constructed. (3) People share many basic concerns around right and wrong but can disagree on how to apply them. (4) Moral change has three major sources: contents, mappings, and coordinations…

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Talia Waltzer

    16 shared
  • Joseph J. Campos

    14 shared
  • Mahesh Srinivasan

    University of California, Berkeley

    11 shared
  • Marianne Barbu‐Roth

    Centre Neurosciences intégratives et Cognition

    8 shared
  • Elliot Turiel

    7 shared
  • Ichiro Uchiyama

    Doshisha University

    7 shared
  • Charles P. Baxley

    University of California, Santa Cruz

    6 shared
  • David I. Anderson

    San Francisco State University

    6 shared

Labs

Similar researchers at Cornell University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Audun Dahl

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup