Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Anna K.  Davis

Anna K. Davis

Ohio State University · History

Active 1990–2024

h-index52
Citations9.9k
Papers270164 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Anna K. Davis — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Anna K. Davis is a graduate student in the Ph.D. program in the Department of History at The Ohio State University. Her research focuses on criminality and imprisonment of medieval English women, with a particular emphasis on the fourteenth century. She holds an M.A. in Medieval Studies from Western Michigan University (2024) and a B.A. in History with honors, along with minors in Medieval & Renaissance Studies and Classical Studies from Sweet Briar College (2020). Davis studies the history of crime and criminality, as well as premodern imprisonment, within the context of medieval history. Her work contributes to understanding the social and legal history of women in the Middle Ages, especially in relation to criminal justice practices of the period.

Research topics

  • Psychiatry
  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Clinical psychology
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • Efficacy and safety of psilocybin-assisted treatment for major depressive disorder: Prospective 12-month follow-up

    Journal of Psychopharmacology · 2022 · 403 citations

    • Psychology
    • Psychiatry
    • Medicine

    BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that psilocybin-assisted treatment produces substantial and rapid antidepressant effects in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but little is known about long-term outcomes. AIMS: This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of psilocybin through 12 months in participants with moderate to severe MDD who received psilocybin. METHODS: This randomized, waiting-list controlled study enrolled 27 patients aged 21-75 with moderate to severe unipolar depression (GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) ⩾ 17). Participants were randomized to an immediate or delayed (8 weeks) treatment condition in which they received two doses of psilocybin with supportive psychotherapy. Twenty-four participants completed both psilocybin sessions and were followed through 12 months following their second dose. RESULTS: = 2.3, 2.0, 2.6, and 2.4, respectively). Treatment response (⩾50% reduction in GRID-HAMD score from baseline) and remission were 75% and 58%, respectively, at 12 months. There were no serious adverse events judged to be related to psilocybin in the long-term follow-up period, and no participants reported psilocybin use outside of the context of the study. Participant ratings of personal meaning, spiritual experience, and mystical experience after sessions predicted increased well-being at 12 months, but did not predict improvement in depression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the substantial antidepressant effects of psilocybin-assisted therapy may be durable at least through 12 months following acute intervention in some patients.

  • Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder

    JAMA Psychiatry · 2020 · 1220 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Medicine
    • Psychiatry
    • Internal medicine

    Importance: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments have limited effectiveness and adherence. Recent evidence suggests that 1 or 2 administrations of psilocybin with psychological support produces antidepressant effects in patients with cancer and in those with treatment-resistant depression. Objective: To investigate the effect of psilocybin therapy in patients with MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, waiting list-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Adults aged 21 to 75 years with an MDD diagnosis, not currently using antidepressant medications, and without histories of psychotic disorder, serious suicide attempt, or hospitalization were eligible to participate. Enrollment occurred between August 2017 and April 2019, and the 4-week primary outcome assessments were completed in July 2019. A total of 27 participants were randomized to an immediate treatment condition group (n = 15) or delayed treatment condition group (waiting list control condition; n = 12). Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020, and included participants who completed the intervention (evaluable population). Interventions: Two psilocybin sessions (session 1: 20 mg/70 kg; session 2: 30 mg/70 kg) were given (administered in opaque gelatin capsules with approximately 100 mL of water) in the context of supportive psychotherapy (approximately 11 hours). Participants were randomized to begin treatment immediately or after an 8-week delay. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, depression severity was assessed with the GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) scores at baseline (score of ≥17 required for enrollment) and weeks 5 and 8 after enrollment for the delayed treatment group, which corresponded to weeks 1 and 4 after the intervention for the immediate treatment group. Secondary outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR). Results: Of the randomized participants, 24 of 27 (89%) completed the intervention and the week 1 and week 4 postsession assessments. This population had a mean (SD) age of 39.8 (12.2) years, was composed of 16 women (67%), and had a mean (SD) baseline GRID-HAMD score of 22.8 (3.9). The mean (SD) GRID-HAMD scores at weeks 1 and 4 (8.0 [7.1] and 8.5 [5.7]) in the immediate treatment group were statistically significantly lower than the scores at the comparable time points of weeks 5 and 8 (23.8 [5.4] and 23.5 [6.0]) in the delayed treatment group. The effect sizes were large at week 5 (Cohen d = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5; P < .001) and week 8 (Cohen d = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-3.7; P < .001). The QIDS-SR documented a rapid decrease in mean (SD) depression score from baseline to day 1 after session 1 (16.7 [3.5] vs 6.3 [4.4]; Cohen d = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5; P < .001), which remained statistically significantly reduced through the week 4 follow-up (6.0 [5.7]; Cohen d = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.0; P < .001). In the overall sample, 17 participants (71%) at week 1 and 17 (71%) at week 4 had a clinically significant response to the intervention (≥50% reduction in GRID-HAMD score), and 14 participants (58%) at week 1 and 13 participants (54%) at week 4 were in remission (≤7 GRID-HAMD score). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest that psilocybin with therapy is efficacious in treating MDD, thus extending the results of previous studies of this intervention in patients with cancer and depression and of a nonrandomized study in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181529.

Frequent coauthors

  • Nathan D. Sepeda

    Johns Hopkins University

    74 shared
  • Roland R. Griffiths

    Johns Hopkins University

    68 shared
  • Rafael Lancelotta

    The Ohio State University

    63 shared
  • Yitong Xin

    52 shared
  • Adam W. Levin

    Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies

    45 shared
  • Maureen A. Walton

    University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

    45 shared
  • Erin E. Bonar

    University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

    43 shared
  • Rebecca M. Cunningham

    University of Minnesota System

    42 shared

Labs

  • Medieval HistoryPI

Similar researchers at Ohio State University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Anna K. Davis

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup