Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Andrei Marmor

Andrei Marmor

· Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Philosophy and Law Co-Director of Ethics and Public Life Philosophy, Program on Ethics and Public Life

Cornell University · Philosophy

Active 1987–2025

h-index26
Citations3.1k
Papers17021 last 5y
Funding—

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Andrei Marmor — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Andrei Marmor is the Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Philosophy and Law at Cornell University. His work encompasses the philosophy of law, discrimination, interpretation, and moral dilemmas in law. He is involved in teaching and research related to these areas, contributing to academic discussions and publications. His professional profile includes appearances on platforms such as the Dare to Know Podcast, and he is recognized for his expertise in legal philosophy and moral reasoning.

Research topics

  • Political Science
  • Computer Science
  • Sociology
  • Computer Security
  • Business
  • Law
  • Internet privacy
  • World Wide Web
  • Philosophy
  • Epistemology

Selected publications

  • Foundations of Institutional Reality

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2022 · 21 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract The book provides a novel account of the ontological foundations of institutional facts, and argues that there are some important epistemic and methodological implications that follow from this ontology. The first part of the book offers a detailed reductive account of institutional facts by way of metaphysical grounding. It shows that an ontology of institutional facts requires an ontology of social rules, and the latter depends on a reductive account of collective attitudes. The book…

  • Constitutionalism, Liberalism, and Democracy

    2021-03-11 · 3 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract This chapter describes the tension between democratic decision-making procedures and constitutional judicial review. It shows that the liberal values that justify a democratic self-government may also vindicate some limits on majoritarian decision-making procedures, but not necessarily in the form of the current constitutional regimes. The chapter argues that constitutional courts are not a necessary feature of a liberal regime. It also acknowledges that democratic decision-making has m…

  • Privacy in Social Media

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2021 · 2 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract Most people’s immediate concern about privacy in social media, and about the internet more generally, relates to data protection. People fear that information they post on various platforms is potentially abused by corporate entities, governments, or even criminals, in all sorts of nefarious ways. The main premise of this chapter is that concerns about data protection, legitimate and serious as they may be, are not, mostly, about the right to privacy. Privacy is about control over the p…

  • What <i>Is</i> Law and What <i>Counts</i> as Law? The Separation Thesis in Context

    Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2021-01-21 · 2 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Marmor considers the separation thesis, which he understands as saying that whether a given norm is legally valid depends on its sources, not its merits; and this means that he is concerned with the separation thesis conceived as a thesis about legal status, not as a thesis about the content of legal statements. Observing that the distinction between sources and merits is very close to the distinction between is and ought, he considers the objection that the separation thesis cannot be upheld be…

  • Law as authoritative fiction 1

    2020-04-14 · 2 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    There are several aspects of law that seem to be connected, but it is not entirely clear why and how. For one, law is an artifact; it is deliberately created by humans to serve some purposes. Furthermore, the law is created and modified by saying things; the law is one of those domains, like fiction, in which the saying so makes it so. But very much unlike fiction, law is an authoritative institution, and its authority is spacio-temporal, tied to location and relative to time. The main purpose o…

Frequent coauthors

  • Federico José Arena

    Centro Científico Tecnológico - Córdoba

    2 shared
  • David Enoch

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    2 shared
  • Jeremy Waldron

    New York University

    2 shared
  • Leslie Green

    1 shared
  • Enrique Villanueva

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    1 shared
  • Robert Posi

    1 shared
  • Joseph Raz Miriam Rodgers

    1 shared
  • Julie Dixon

    Mental Health Commission

    1 shared

Awards & honors

  • Neil Lubow Prize

Similar researchers at Cornell University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Andrei Marmor

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup