Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Steve Harrel

· Dr.Verified

Texas A&M University · Periodontics

Active 1995–2026

h-index22
Citations2.5k
Papers6614 last 5y
Funding$815k
See your match with Steve Harrel — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Retrieval
  • Medicine
  • Orthodontics
  • Data science
  • Dentistry

Selected publications

  • The Effect of Age and Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative on Implant Loss

    Dentistry Journal · 2026-01-19

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Background: Previous reports suggest that patient age at the time of implant placement is not a factor in implant survival. However, analysis of data compiled for a previously published study on the effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD), a frequently used biomaterial to aid bone regeneration, on peri-implantitis indicated that age and use of EMD may be a factor in implant survival. The current study further evaluated the existing database to determine the effect of age and EMD use on long term survival of implants. Methods: An existing database from a private periodontal specialty practice was evaluated for the effect of age at the time of implant placement on implant survival. In addition, all available clinical factors were evaluated, including the use of EMD at any point during site preparation or implant placement to determine any effect on implant survival. Results: Patient age at the time of implant placement had a negligible effect on implant survival for younger individuals. However, starting at 58 years of age, an increase in relative risk for implant loss was noted. When the patient age was divided into groups, it was determined that patients ≥ 58 and ≤68 years had a statistically significantly increased relative risk of implant loss (2.75), which was sharply reduced if EMD had been used (1.24). This trend was also noted to a lesser extent in patients older than 68 years. Conclusions: The risk of implant loss was elevated when implants were placed in older patients. This risk was reduced if EMD had been used at any point during implant site preparation or placement.

  • Dentistry has been put on notice

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2025-01-30

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Authors’ Response

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2025-05-03

    letter1st authorCorresponding
  • The Reevaluation of Subgingival Calculus: A Narrative Review

    Dentistry Journal · 2025-06-09 · 1 citations

    reviewOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Aim: Despite a persistent presence in periodontitis, calculus remains a paradox. This narrative review reevaluates the role of calculus in periodontitis based on in situ, ex vivo, and in vitro studies published over the last two decades. Review: Results from multiple studies argue for the reconsideration of calculus as an independent risk factor in periodontitis. The results of a human study suggest that calculus contributes more to inflammation than simply serving as a substrate for biofilm accumulation. Ultrastructure studies have revealed residual calculus embedded in cementum following scaling and root planing (SRP). In vitro studies show that calculus particles can stimulate IL-1β secretion via the NLRP3 inflammasome in human and mouse phagocytes, and the crystalline structure is partially responsible for the activation. Other studies indicate that calculus particles may promote bone resorption via IL-1β induction in patients with periodontitis. Further, heat-treated calculus particles and hydroxyapatite crystals induce cell death in epithelial cell lines, suggesting that calculus plays a role in the breakdown of pocket epithelial integrity. Conclusions: Studies have shown that particles of microscopic calculus persist following traditional SRP. In vitro studies report that sterile and calcined calculus particles free of proteinaceous material are cytotoxic to cultured oral epithelial cells. Collectively, these studies suggest that residual microscopic calculus may be a potential risk factor for the failure of periodontal therapy.

  • Authors’ Response

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2025-10-01

    letterSenior author
  • Laser and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of residual microislands of calculus

    Journal of Periodontology · 2024-06-27 · 2 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest a role for microscopic crystalline particles of residual dental calculus in the pathogenesis of periodontitis. The purpose of this ex vivo study was to compare the effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) alone versus SRP combined with 24% ethylenediamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA) gel in removing calculus from extracted teeth and to determine the optimal length of time for application of the EDTA. METHODS: Specimens consisted of 32 extracted teeth with heavy root calculus. A 4-mm diameter site was prepared on the root surface of each tooth which then underwent SRP. EDTA was applied to four timed groups: 30 s; 60 s; 120 s; and 180 s. Photomicrographs were taken at 40× magnification using white light (WL) and laser fluorescence (LF). Photomicrographs were analyzed using ImageJ. Specimens were also evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The mean area of residual calculus after SRP was 45%-53% (45.6% ± 19.6% WL, 53.8% ± 19.7% LF). Burnishing with EDTA for one minute following SRP reduced calculus to only 14%-18% (13.9% ± 12.5% LF, 18.2% ± 11.1% WL). Use of EDTA for greater than 1 min showed no further calculus removal. SEM revealed the surface of remaining calculus was altered by burnishing with EDTA. CONCLUSION: SRP alone or SRP + 24% EDTA gel failed to remove all calculus. SRP alone removed >60% of calculus from root surfaces. Adjunctive use of 24% EDTA gel burnished on the root surface removed most of the calculus residual after SRP. Calculus remaining after EDTA burnishing exhibited a significantly altered morphologic appearance.

  • The need for updated treatment- and outcomes-based guidelines for periodontal therapy

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2024-06-15

    editorial1st authorCorresponding
  • Calculus

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2023-08-30 · 3 citations

    editorial1st authorCorresponding
  • The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative during Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implantitis: A Case Series

    Dentistry Journal · 2023-12-30 · 4 citations

    articleOpen accessCorresponding

    Peri-implantitis is a growing concern and currently, there is no agreement on the best method for treating this condition. This study looked at surgical intervention with the use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) for treating this condition. A cohort of 25 (34 implants) consecutive patients treated with EMD for peri-implantitis was followed for up to 6.4 years. The survival of the implants as well as changes in clinical parameters are reported. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t tests and general estimating equations. The mean length of time implants were followed post-surgery was 3.05 ± 1.53 years. All but two of the treated implants survived in function (94%). Both failed implants were lost in the same patient, who was a heavy smoker. The changes in mean probing depth (1.94 ± 1.18 mm), change in deepest probing depth (3.12 ± 1.45 mm), and reduction in bleeding on probing (73.6 ± 43.9%) according to patient means were all highly significant (p < 0.001 for all changes). When EMD is used during surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, there is a high survival rate of implants and significant improvements in clinical parameters.

  • Effect of EDTA Gel on Residual Subgingival Calculus and Biofilm: An In Vitro Pilot Study

    Dentistry Journal · 2023-01-09 · 6 citations

    articleOpen access

    BACKGROUND: Residual calculus, following scaling and root planing (SRP), is associated with persistent inflammation and the progression of periodontitis. This study examined the effects of a 24% neutral ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) gel on subgingival calculus and biofilms. METHODS: Eleven single-rooted teeth extracted because of severe periodontal disease were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: (1) three teeth served as untreated controls; (2) three teeth were treated by scaling and root planing (SRP) only; and (3) three teeth were treated by SRP + EDTA. The remaining two teeth, one SRP only and the other SRP + EDTA were designated for energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. EDTA gel was placed on the SRP surface for 2 min and then burnished with a sterile cotton pellet. RESULTS: SRP + EDTA treated specimens exhibited severely damaged biofilm and the disruption of the extracellular polymeric matrix. EDS scans of the smear layer and calculus featured reductions in the Weight % and Atomic % for N, F, Na, and S and increases in Mg, P, and Ca. CONCLUSIONS: A 25% neutral EDTA gel was applied after SRP severely disrupted the residual biofilm and altered the character of dental calculus and the smear layer as shown by reductions in the Weight % and Atomic % for N, F, Na, and S and increases in Mg, P, and Ca.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Francisco Rivera‐Hidalgo

    Texas A&M University

    25 shared
  • Martha E. Nunn

    Biostatistical Consulting (United States)

    24 shared
  • Celeste M Abraham

    Texas A&M University

    23 shared
  • Jay D. Shulman

    13 shared
  • Thomas G. Wilson

    Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences

    12 shared
  • Jeffrey A. Rossmann

    11 shared
  • David G. Kerns

    Texas A&M University

    9 shared
  • Daisha J. Cipher

    9 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Steve Harrel

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup