
Victoria Gallagher
VerifiedNorth Carolina State University · Communication
Active 1981–2024
About
Victoria J. Gallagher is a Distinguished University Professor of Communication at NC State University, where she has served on the faculty since 1990. Her scholarly interests include visual and material rhetoric, rhetorical theory and criticism, communication ethics, and organizational communication. Her primary research focuses on the rhetorical analysis of civil rights discourse, commemorative sites such as museums and memorials, visual and material culture, and public art. She is the principal investigator of the award-winning Virtual Martin Luther King project, a significant digital humanities initiative supported in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Gallagher has also conducted research on gender and communication in engineering work teams, communication ethics, and communication education. She has authored and edited works related to urban communication and public memory, and her work has been featured in prominent media outlets and academic podcasts. Throughout her career, she has received numerous awards for her contributions to public humanities, communication research, and teaching, including the highest honor bestowed by NC State University, the Alexander Quarles Holladay Medal of Excellence. In addition to her research, Gallagher has held leadership roles within professional associations such as the Southern States Communication Association and the Rhetoric Society of America, and she has served on community advisory boards, including the North Carolina Freedom Park Advisory Board.
Research topics
- Political Science
- Computer Science
- Pedagogy
- Sociology
- Psychology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Geography
- Epistemology
- World Wide Web
- Law
- Engineering
- Communication
- Mathematics education
- History
Selected publications
Dynamics Of Peer Interactions In Cooperative Learning
2024 · 7 citations
1st authorCorresponding- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Mathematics education
Although many recent studies demonstrate that cooperative learning provides a variety of educational advantages over more traditional instructional models, little is known about the interactional dynamics among students in engineering workgroups. We explored these dynamics and their implications for engineering education by analyzing work sessions of student groups in a sophomore-level chemical engineering course at North Carolina State University. Using conversation analysis as a methodology for understanding how students taught and learned from one another, we found that group members engaged in two types of teaching-learning interactions. In the first type, transfer-of-knowledge (TK) sequences, students took on distinct teacher and pupil roles, and in the second, collaborative sequences (CS), they worked on problems with no clear role differentiation. Student management of both types of sequences was affected by gender factors and interpersonal communication. Our findings suggest that facilitating effective interactional dynamics can enhance cooperative learning in groups.
Enacting Equity and Ethics through VR in the Public Speaking Classroom
2023-11-22
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingThis chapter demonstrates how a collective VR experience of the Virtual Martin Luther King (vMLK) Project leads to significant learning outcomes in the Public Speaking course at a major university. Written student reflections and survey data demonstrate that the VR experience fosters the kind of reflection that evokes a participatory readiness for civic engagement by enabling students to put themselves into the position of those who heard the speech in 1960 and then transferring that experience to themselves as speakers who are engaging with issues and ideas today. The result is an ethical approach—utilizing VR—for teaching students how to engage in advocacy in and with communities.
Crafting a technology of recovery: the story of the Virtual Martin Luther King Project
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies · 2023-04-03
article1st author2022-04-05
book-chapterSeveral key questions about evaluating the University of Nevada, Reno’s Campus Master Plan from a “deep roots” perspective are worth considering, both in relation to the 2019 Rhetoric Society of America Project in Power, Place, and Publics at the University of Nevada, Reno (RSA Project) and in relation to others that gather rhetorical scholars and community leaders for the purpose of developing productive outcomes: What methodologies are needed for rhetorical scholars to explore and assess the collective and historic identity of groups situated in urban place and space? How can we interrogate the practices associated with an immersive cultural experience in a scholarly working group? How can a deliberative framework inform similar future projects? In this article, we advance three essential tasks for rhetorical scholars to engage in when undertaking such projects: (1) use more of rhetoric’s generative power and less of its critical/analytical power in order to articulate multiple possible avenues for developing places and spaces; (2) conduct extensive on-the-ground research to uncover the “collective identity” of various stakeholders and to show how those identities can productively inform planning; and (3) identify common ground as well as intractable differences among stakeholder positions and provide inventive ideas for managing both.
University of South Carolina Press eBooks · 2021-12-24
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingFROM “DEAD WRONG” TO CIVIL RIGHTS HISTORY:
University of South Carolina Press eBooks · 2020 · 1 citations
1st authorCorresponding- Political Science
- Political Science
- History
An integrative view on refugee research: New research insights and lessons learned for academics
2020-01-01
articleCommunication Education · 2020 · 6 citations
1st authorCorresponding- Sociology
- Sociology
- Pedagogy
This study examines how students characterize their experience of a communication-based digital humanities project in relation to elements of situated embodiment and situated learning. Analysis of student response data indicates that the Virtual Martin Luther King Project situates students in a particular space and historical context resulting in communication outcomes including a form of cognitive attention that is conducive of reflection and fosters civic engagement. The essay concludes with a discussion of what is transferable from this case in relation to creating the conditions for situated learning and public address as immersive, embodied experience in communication classrooms.
Argumentation and Advocacy · 2020-12-22
article1st authorCorrespondingCaitlin Frances Bruce’s Painting Publics: Transnational Legal Graffiti Scenes as Spaces for Encounter explores scenes of publicity and public making through visual culture. Bruce draws upon and e...
Review of Communication · 2020-04-01 · 1 citations
articleSeveral key questions about evaluating the University of Nevada, Reno’s Campus Master Plan from a “deep roots” perspective are worth considering, both in relation to the 2019 Rhetoric Society of America Project in Power, Place, and Publics at the University of Nevada, Reno (RSA Project) and in relation to others that gather rhetorical scholars and community leaders for the purpose of developing productive outcomes: What methodologies are needed for rhetorical scholars to explore and assess the collective and historic identity of groups situated in urban place and space? How can we interrogate the practices associated with an immersive cultural experience in a scholarly working group? How can a deliberative framework inform similar future projects? In this article, we advance three essential tasks for rhetorical scholars to engage in when undertaking such projects: (1) use more of rhetoric’s generative power and less of its critical/analytical power in order to articulate multiple possible avenues for developing places and spaces; (2) conduct extensive on-the-ground research to uncover the “collective identity” of various stakeholders and to show how those identities can productively inform planning; and (3) identify common ground as well as intractable differences among stakeholder positions and provide inventive ideas for managing both.
Frequent coauthors
- 13 shared
Susan J. Drucker
- 13 shared
Matthew D. Matsaganis
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- 9 shared
Roderick Hindery
- 9 shared
John Keegan
- 9 shared
C Eugéne
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès
- 9 shared
David Anderson Hooker
University of Notre Dame
- 9 shared
Brevard S. Childs
- 9 shared
Richard Penaskovic
Auburn University
Labs
Research and EngagementPI
Education
- 2003
Ph.D., American Studies
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- 1998
M.A., American Studies
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- 1995
B.A., American Studies
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Awards & honors
- Harlan Joel Gradin Award for Excellence in Public Humanities
- NC State University Libraries Faculty Award
- Robert M. Entman award for Excellence in Communication Resea…
- Graduate School Outstanding Graduate Faculty Mentoring Award…
- NC State Board of Trustees Alexander Quarles Holladay Medal…
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Victoria Gallagher
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup