Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Timothy Williamson

Timothy Williamson

· A. Whitney Griswold Visiting Professor

Yale University · Department of Philosophy

Active 1982–2026

h-index63
Citations21.4k
Papers485116 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Timothy Williamson — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Timothy Williamson is a professor associated with the Department of Philosophy at Yale University, serving as the A. Whitney Griswold Visiting Professor of Philosophy during the second half of the spring semester. His recent publications include 'Good as Usual: Anti-Exceptionalist Essays on Values, Norms, and Action' and 'Overfitting and Heuristics in Philosophy,' both published by Oxford University Press in 2024. His research focuses on philosophical issues related to values, norms, and action, contributing to contemporary debates in these areas. Williamson's work is recognized for its rigorous analysis and engagement with foundational questions in philosophy.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medicine
  • Epistemology
  • Discrete mathematics
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Mathematics
  • Cardiology
  • Philosophy
  • Mathematical economics

Selected publications

  • Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Era: Early Insights From the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry

    Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022 · 225 citations

    =0.037). Conclusions Mortality in the intermediate- and high-risk patients with PAH remains unacceptably high in the PHAR, suggesting the importance for early diagnosis, aggressive use of available therapies, and the need for better therapeutics.

  • Justifications, Excuses, and Sceptical Scenarios

    2025-01-06 · 167 citations

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract This chapter argues that epistemologists have misapplied the term ‘justified’ by relying on an impoverished menu of normative options, and in particular by neglecting the category of excuses, for example when classifying as justified the false beliefs of victims of sceptical scenarios. More generally, any norm is shown to generate various logically independent derivative norms, such as being disposed to comply with the primary norm, and doing what someone disposed to comply with the pri…

  • Suppose and Tell

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2020 · 97 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    The book argues that our use of conditionals is governed by imperfectly reliable heuristics, in the psychological sense of fast and frugal (or quick and dirty) ways of assessing them. The primary heuristic is this: to assess ‘If A, C’, suppose A and on that basis assess C; whatever attitude you take to C conditionally on A (such as acceptance, rejection, or something in between) take unconditionally to ‘If A, C’. This heuristic yields both the equation of the probability of ‘If A, C’ with the co…

  • Understanding and Inference1

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2020 · 79 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Abstract The chapter challenges the inferentialist account of concept possession on which Boghossian relies in Chapter 2 in his account of the transmission of justification by deductive reasoning. Unorthodox speakers who reject the inferences in alleged possession condition can still have the concept by understanding a word for it. In that sense, the inferences are not analytic. Inferentialist accounts of logical constants, theoretical terms (using the method developed by Frank Ramsey, Rudolf Ca…

  • Non-Modal Normativity and Norms of Belief

    2025-01-06 · 16 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract The chapter argues that articulating norms in terms of deontic modals introduces potentially conflicting noise, because the semantics of deontic modals is sensitive to a parameter for the set of contextually relevant possibilities, whereas the underlying condition for complying with the norm is not context-sensitive in that way. Thus, the norm is more perspicuously represented by its compliance condition than by the corresponding conditions for permissibility or obligation. To illustrat…

Frequent coauthors

  • Paul Boghossian

    New York University

    20 shared
  • Sonja Bartolome

    The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    17 shared
  • Corey E. Ventetuolo

    Brown University

    15 shared
  • Lesley Thoms

    LMU Klinikum

    15 shared
  • Oksana A. Shlobin

    Inova Fairfax Hospital

    13 shared
  • Roham T. Zamanian

    Stanford University

    11 shared
  • Matthew R. Lammi

    Johns Hopkins University

    11 shared
  • U Of Lethbridge

    University of Calgary

    9 shared

Similar researchers at Yale University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Timothy Williamson

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup