Sujaya Rao
· Professor EmeritusVerifiedUniversity of Minnesota · Entomology
Active 1965–2024
Research topics
- Ecology
- Biology
- Pedagogy
- Food science
- Business
- Aerospace engineering
- Zoology
- Demography
- Biotechnology
- Simulation
- Horticulture
- Agronomy
- Psychology
- Agroforestry
- Engineering
- Aeronautics
- Marketing
Selected publications
Comparing <i>Drosophila suzukii</i> flight behavior using free‐flight and tethered flight assays
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · 2022 · 9 citations
- Biology
- Ecology
- Aeronautics
Abstract Tethered flight mills and free‐flight studies are two common approaches for examining insect flight behavior in the laboratory. Flight behavior studies are significant because they provide information with understanding dispersal and range expansion. Each approach has advantages and drawbacks and can influence the flight behavior of the study organism. However, tethered and untethered flight studies are rarely performed simultaneously to determine whether one technique is better suited for a particular species. Here, we conducted a tethered and untethered flight study to determine the limitations, benefits, and effects the two methods could have on assessing an insect's flight capacity. We focused the study on the global invasive pest, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Propensity of flight and flight duration, distance, and velocity were examined for (1) females and males, and (2) summer and winter morphs, as the two morphs differ significantly in body and wing size. The study showed that summer morphs were more likely to fly when untethered than when tethered to a flight mill. Additionally, when comparing the length of time of flight for first take‐off, D. suzukii flew longer when untethered. Outcomes from this study provide information on D. suzukii flight behavior, which could assist with future research on this economically important fruit pest that is rapidly expanding its range. The results also suggest that the flight apparatus can affect D. suzukii flight behaviors, such that future laboratory flight research should be considerate of the flight technique utilized.
Journal of Insect Science · 2020 · 26 citations
Senior authorCorresponding- Biology
- Marketing
- Biotechnology
Positive experiences with insect food items that highlight the benefits of insect production and reduce the novelty of entomophagy are needed. Toward this goal, we developed an experiential learning lesson plan that would provide a positive experience with entomophagy and associate key educational content related to insect food items. First, two cricket powder brownie taste-test surveys were conducted with groups of university students to evaluate attitudes relating to insects as food, sustainability of insect production, and nutritional content. Students displayed a taste preference for cricket flour brownies but could not consistently differentiate between brownie types, ranked environmental and nutritional benefits associated with insect food products over taste factors alone, and indicated a positive attitude toward purchasing insect products in the future. Willingness to try other insect products in the future was significantly greater for students with increased experience with consuming insect products. These results were then used to create an university lesson plan that will allows for future evaluation of student attitudes while increasing exposure to entomophagy and providing education on the positive aspects of insects as food production. Our work highlights the favorable attitude toward insect food products shown by university students and how positive perception of entomophagy increases with continued exposure to the practice.
Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2020 · 355 citations
- Biology
- Agroforestry
- Agronomy
Most of the world's crops depend on pollinators, so declines in both managed and wild bees raise concerns about food security. However, the degree to which insect pollination is actually limiting current crop production is poorly understood, as is the role of wild species (as opposed to managed honeybees) in pollinating crops, particularly in intensive production areas. We established a nationwide study to assess the extent of pollinator limitation in seven crops at 131 locations situated across major crop-producing areas of the USA. We found that five out of seven crops showed evidence of pollinator limitation. Wild bees and honeybees provided comparable amounts of pollination for most crops, even in agriculturally intensive regions. We estimated the nationwide annual production value of wild pollinators to the seven crops we studied at over $1.5 billion; the value of wild bee pollination of all pollinator-dependent crops would be much greater. Our findings show that pollinator declines could translate directly into decreased yields or production for most of the crops studied, and that wild species contribute substantially to pollination of most study crops in major crop-producing regions.
Frequent coauthors
- 49 shared
Mark K. Asplen
Metropolitan State University
- 48 shared
Robert McGregor
Douglas College
- 48 shared
Molly E. Hunter
University of Arizona
- 48 shared
Erick Campan
Laboratoire Écologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement
- 48 shared
Guy Boivin
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
- 48 shared
David Morgan
- 48 shared
S En
University of Arizona
- 48 shared
Patrina Brennan
Similar researchers at University of Minnesota
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Sujaya Rao
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup