
Scott Frickel
· Professor of Environment and Society & SociologyVerifiedBrown University · Environmental Studies
Active 1994–2025
About
Scott Frickel is a Professor of Environment and Society and Sociology at Brown University. His research interests include environment-society interactions, experts and knowledge/ignorance, social movements, social theory, risk and disaster, and urbanization. He has contributed to discussions on environmental policies, science activism, and the social dimensions of environmental issues, frequently offering commentary for various media outlets on topics such as climate policy, federal environmental oversight, and science activism. His work is characterized by a focus on the social dynamics that influence environmental and societal change.
Research topics
- Sociology
- Political Science
- Law
- Computer Science
- Engineering
- Engineering ethics
- Environmental resource management
- Environmental science
- Geography
- Public relations
- Environmental planning
- Environmental ethics
- Political economy
- Business
Selected publications
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · 2025-07-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessABSTRACT Community resilience planning (CRP) research encompasses diverse disciplinary foci, ranging from ecological and sociopolitical to engineering studies, and employs a range of analytic scales and methodologies. Despite the rise of integrative approaches to studying increasingly complex risks faced by communities—in particular, the growing, and often inequitable, impacts of climate and weather stressors and extremes—CRP remains a fragmented field of study and practice. This paper provides a broad map of the CRP field over the last 25 years, linking bibliometric methods with novel, network‐based, multilevel approaches to computational text analysis. Despite trends toward interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, our analysis demonstrates that the CRP field consists of divergent bodies of research, characteristic of disciplinary siloing. At the same time, new approaches to computational text analysis provide innovative ways to understand the epistemic and social links across subfields, revealing patterns of connectivity that traditional citation‐based bibliometric methods cannot access. Results indicate that the development and maturation of CRP are characterized in part by a longitudinal transformation in research methods and by a shift in substantive questions that CRP researchers are asking. These findings suggest that thematic and credit‐based structures operate in tandem to produce complex webs of interconnection across the disciplinary domains that have historically constituted the field. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Toxic Timescapes: Examining Toxicity across Time and Space
Ambix · 2025-06-23 · 2 citations
article1st authorCorrespondingEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2024-04-03
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingHidden hazards refer to toxic chemicals or other hazardous wastes that, while present in human environments, remain unknown or unrecognized as potential threats to public health and ecosystems. This entry reviews the history of hidden hazards in sociological research, and maps their connections, theoretically and empirically, to technological disasters and risk society. Particular emphasis on processes of socioenvironmental succession draws attention to how interlocking changes among places, people, and policies gradually produce hidden hazards through cumulative changes in industrial land use and reuse. Mounting evidence that hidden hazards are a systemic problem across urban North America exacerbates the urgency for finding and studying hidden hazards.
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2024-04-03
book-chapterSenior authorAccounts of the environmental state have played a relatively minor role in the development of environmental sociology. We review normative, historical, and institutionalist conceptualizations of the environmental state and offer a new definition centered on the provision of environmental welfare. The intellectual history environmental sociology points to reasons that the environmental state may have been neglected by the subfield and makes clear why other subfields and even disciplines have more successfully advanced environmental sociological state theory. More recent work in environmental sociology promises a deeper engagement with state theory, and we suggest promising areas for future research on the environmental state.
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023-08-17
articleOpen accessInternational audience
Entretien avec Scott Frickel (Brown University & Institute at Brown for Environment and Society)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023-01-01
otherOpen access1st authorCorrespondingCe portrait fait partie d'une série d'entretiens avec des figures importantes du champ des études sur l'ignorance.
The Environmental State: Nature and the Politics of Environmental Protection
Sociological Theory · 2023 · 21 citations
Senior authorCorresponding- Sociology
- Political Science
- Environmental ethics
Basic oppositions between economic growth and environmental protection are well understood by sociologists, but the state’s role in environmental protection and regulation is underspecified in sociological theory. We define the environmental state and theorize two structuring forces central to its provision of environmental welfare. First, culturally distinctive constructions of nature shape environmental politics and statecraft. State actions linked to charismatic “special” nature often win broad political support, whereas actions linked to less resonant “ordinary” nature do not. Second, historical legacies of developmentalism shape environmental coalitions. Arms of the environmental state that combine extractive pasts with newer regulatory responsibilities are better able to build broad support, whereas narrowly regulatory or developmental arms struggle to do so. We illustrate the relevance of each process for the politics of environmental regulation and of technoscientific expertise. Both processes help explain the varied efficacy of environmental states and set the stage for their comparative study.
Parks, People, and Pollution: A Relational Study of Socioenvironmental Succession
City and Community · 2023-02-06 · 3 citations
articleOpen accessThe urban environmental inequality literature holds that marginalized communities are generally concentrated in neighborhoods with greater levels of industrial pollution and lesser access to parks and playfields. Yet, “green” and “brown” land uses are also linked historically and through contemporary practices of green redevelopment. This article thus begins from the understanding that it is important to analyze both forms of urban land use at once, to avoid mistaking one historical process for another. Focusing on Providence, Rhode Island (1970–2010), we leverage original historical data on the location and operating years of public parks alongside comprehensive industrial site data to analyze the joint transformation of residential populations, parks, and industry over time. We find that park access generally increases for Latinx residents; however, after accounting for increases in park access associated with past industrial land use, we find that census tracts with growing proportions of African American residents are associated with relatively less access to parks than other census tracts. Results reveal additional dimensions to the role of industrial history in shaping the socioenvironmental trajectory of local neighborhoods and additionally emphasize the importance of a historical and relational view of urban land use in urban environmental research.
Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
Science Advances · 2023 · 13 citations
- Political Science
- Sociology
- Political Science
Science is under attack and scientists are becoming more involved in efforts to defend it. The rise in science advocacy raises important questions regarding how science mobilization can both defend science and promote its use for the public good while also including the communities that benefit from science. This article begins with a discussion of the relevance of science advocacy. It then reviews research pointing to how scientists can sustain, diversify, and increase the political impact of their mobilization. Scientists, we argue, can build and maintain politically impactful coalitions by engaging with and addressing social group differences and diversity instead of suppressing them. The article concludes with a reflection on how the study of science-related mobilization would benefit from further research.
Science activism is surging – which marks a culture shift among scientists
2023-07-06
article1st authorCorresponding
Recent grants
NSF · $212k · 2016–2018
Collaborative Research: Urban-Environmental Restructuring in the U.S.
NSF · $122k · 2009–2012
Disaster Science and Technology Studies (DSTS): Advancing an Emerging Subfield
NSF · $25k · 2012–2014
Frequent coauthors
- 26 shared
Thomas Marlow
AstraZeneca (Sweden)
- 16 shared
J. J. Tollefson
John Brown University
- 13 shared
Soraya Boudia
Centre de Recherche Médecine, Sciences, Santé, Santé Mentale, Société
- 11 shared
Florencia Arancibia
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- 11 shared
James R. Elliott
Rice University
- 10 shared
Samuel Bell
- 9 shared
Jody A. Roberts
- 8 shared
Carsten Reinhardt
Bielefeld University
Education
- 2000
MS and PhD, Sociology
University of Wisconsin
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Scott Frickel
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup