Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Moses Charikar

Moses Charikar

· Professor, Computer Science

Stanford University · South Asian Studies

Active 1997–2026

h-index63
Citations19.7k
Papers30665 last 5y
Funding$2.6M

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Moses Charikar — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Moses Charikar is the Donald E. Knuth professor of Computer Science at Stanford University. He obtained his PhD from Stanford in 2000 and has a background that includes a year in the research group at Google and faculty experience at Princeton from 2001 to 2015. His research interests encompass efficient algorithmic techniques for processing, searching, and indexing massive high-dimensional data sets; algorithms for high-dimensional statistics and machine learning optimization problems; approximation algorithms for discrete optimization problems with provable guarantees; convex optimization approaches for non-convex combinatorial optimization problems; and low-distortion embeddings of finite metric spaces. His work has been recognized with several awards, including best paper awards at FOCS 2003, COLT 2017, and SODA 2024, the 10-year best paper award at VLDB 2017, and the 20-year test of time award at STOC 2022. He was jointly awarded the 2012 Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award for his work on locality sensitive hashing, named a Simons Investigator in theoretical computer science in 2014, and became an ACM Fellow in 2021.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Ecology
  • Biology
  • Theoretical computer science
  • Mathematics
  • Geography
  • Mathematical optimization

Selected publications

  • Distributed algorithms from arboreal ants for the shortest path problem

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2023 · 11 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Colonies of the arboreal turtle ant create networks of trails that link nests and food sources on the graph formed by branches and vines in the canopy of the tropical forest. Ants put down a volatile pheromone on the edges as they traverse them. At each vertex, the next edge to traverse is chosen using a decision rule based on the current pheromone level. There is a bidirectional flow of ants around the network. In a previous field study, it was observed that the trail networks approximately min…

  • Breaking the Metric Voting Distortion Barrier

    Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2024-01-01 · 10 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    We consider the following well studied problem of metric distortion in social choice. Suppose we have an election with n voters and m candidates who lie in a shared metric space. We would like to design a voting rule that chooses a candidate whose average distance to the voters is small. However, instead of having direct access to the distances in the metric space, each voter gives us a ranked list of the candidates in order of distance. Can we design a rule that regardless of the election insta…

  • Breaking the Metric Voting Distortion Barrier

    Journal of the ACM · 2024-09-20 · 4 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    We consider the following well-studied problem of metric distortion in social choice. Suppose that we have an election with n voters and m candidates located in a shared metric space. We would like to design a voting rule that chooses a candidate whose average distance to the voters is small. However, instead of having direct access to the distances in the metric space, the voting rule obtains, from each voter, a ranked list of the candidates in order of distance. Can we design a rule that, rega…

  • Six Candidates Suffice to Win a Voter Majority

    2025-06-15 · 1 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    A cornerstone of social choice theory is Condorcet’s paradox which says that in an election where n voters rank m candidates it is possible that, no matter which candidate is declared the winner, a majority of voters would have preferred an alternative candidate. Instead, can we always choose a small committee of winning candidates that is preferred to any alternative candidate by a majority of voters?<br/>Elkind, Lang, and Saffidine raised this question and called such a committee a Condorcet w…

  • Approximately Dominating Sets in Elections

    Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2026-01-01

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Condorcet’s paradox is a fundamental result in social choice theory which states that there exist elections in which, no matter which candidate wins, a majority of voters prefer a different candidate. In fact, even if we can select any \(k\) winners, there still may exist another candidate that would beat each of the winners in a majority vote. That is, elections may require arbitrarily large dominating sets.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Sudipto Guha

    University of Pennsylvania

    34 shared
  • Howard Karloff

    New York Proton Center

    33 shared
  • Ashish Goel

    32 shared
  • Prabhakar Raghavan

    29 shared
  • Uriel Feige

    28 shared
  • David B. Shmoys

    Cornell University

    27 shared
  • Cristina G. Fernandes

    25 shared
  • Jiri Sgall

    Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme

    25 shared

Labs

Education

  • Ph.D., Computer Science

    Stanford University

    1994
  • M.S., Computer Science

    Stanford University

    1991
  • B.S., Computer Science

    University of California, Berkeley

    1989

Awards & honors

  • best paper awards at FOCS 2003, COLT 2017 and SODA 2024
  • 10 year best paper award at VLDB 2017
  • 20 year test of time award at STOC 2022
  • Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award (2012)
  • Simons Investigator in theoretical computer science (2014)

Similar researchers at Stanford University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Moses Charikar

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup