Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Michele Gelfand

Michele Gelfand

· John H. Scully Professor of Cross-Cultural Management and Professor, by courtesy, of Psychology

Stanford University · Psychology

Active 1992–2026

h-index84
Citations37.6k
Papers33399 last 5y
Funding$123k

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Michele Gelfand — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Michele Gelfand is the John H. Scully Professor of Cross-Cultural Management and Professor of Organizational Behavior at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, with a courtesy appointment in Psychology. Her research employs field, experimental, computational, and neuroscience methods to understand the evolution of culture and its multilevel consequences. Gelfand's work has been published in prominent outlets such as Science, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Human Behavior, and others. She is the founding co-editor of the Advances in Culture and Psychology series and authored the book 'Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: How Tight and Loose Cultures Wire the World' published in 2018. Her contributions to the field have been recognized through numerous awards, including the Diener award from SPSP, the Outstanding International Psychologist Award from the American Psychological Association, and the Contributions to Society award from the Organizational Behavior Division of the Academy of Management. She has been elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2019 and the National Academy of Sciences in 2021.

Research topics

  • Political Science
  • Sociology
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Social Science
  • Public relations
  • Computer Science
  • Law
  • Engineering

Selected publications

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Nature Communications · 2022 · 279 citations

    Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1, N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated self-reported factors associated with public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-Ma…

  • A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19

    Nature · 2023 · 107 citations

    proposed 19 policy recommendations ('claims') detailing how evidence from behavioural science could contribute to efforts to reduce impacts and end the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we assess 747 pandemic-related research articles that empirically investigated those claims. We report the scale of evidence and whether evidence supports them to indicate applicability for policymaking. Two independent teams, involving 72 reviewers, found evidence for 18 of 19 claims, with both teams finding evidence supp…

  • Persuading republicans and democrats to comply with mask wearing: An intervention tournament

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · 2022 · 64 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    = 4931). Seven different conditions reflecting different moral values and factors specific to COVID-19-including protection from harm (self), protection from harm (community), patriotic duty, purity, reviving the economy, threat, and scientific evidence-were implemented to identify which framings would "win" in terms of promoting mask wearing compared to a baseline condition. We found that Republicans had significantly more negative attitudes toward masks, lower intentions to wear them, and were…

  • Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data

    Scientific Reports · 2022 · 62 citations

    The present paper examines longitudinally how subjective perceptions about COVID-19, one's community, and the government predict adherence to public health measures to reduce the spread of the virus. Using an international survey (N = 3040), we test how infection risk perception, trust in the governmental response and communications about COVID-19, conspiracy beliefs, social norms on distancing, tightness of culture, and community punishment predict various containment-related attitudes and beha…

  • The Importance of Cultural Tightness and Government Efficiency For Understanding COVID-19 Growth and Death Rates

    2020 · 40 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    We have withdrawn this preprint as we update analyses with data on later stages of COVID-19. We will post an updated preprint as it is available. In the interim, if colleagues are interested in using the tightness-looseness scores we developed for this paper, we provide them below.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

Labs

  • Vice Provost for Student AffairsPI

Education

  • Ph.D., Psychology

    University of Maryland, College Park

Awards & honors

  • 2016 Diener award from SPSP
  • 2017 Outstanding International Psychologist Award from the A…
  • 2019 Outstanding Cultural Psychology Award from the Society…
  • 2020 Rubin Theory-to-Practice award from the International A…
  • 2021 Contributions to Society award from the Organizational…

Similar researchers at Stanford University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Michele Gelfand

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup