Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Mehryar Mohri

Mehryar Mohri

· Professor of Computer Science and Mathematics

New York University · Computer Science

Active 1985–2026

h-index77
Citations24.1k
Papers45491 last 5y
Funding$1.1M

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Mehryar Mohri — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

The provided page text does not contain a detailed professional biography or research focus of Professor Mehryar Mohri. It primarily lists current and former members of his research group, along with their titles and affiliations. Therefore, there is no specific biographical information or description of his research contributions available in the given content.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Mining
  • Data science
  • World Wide Web
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics
  • Mathematical optimization
  • Distributed computing

Selected publications

  • A Field Guide to Federated Optimization

    arXiv (Cornell University) · 2021 · 167 citations

    Federated learning and analytics are a distributed approach for collaboratively learning models (or statistics) from decentralized data, motivated by and designed for privacy protection. The distributed learning process can be formulated as solving federated optimization problems, which emphasize communication efficiency, data heterogeneity, compatibility with privacy and system requirements, and other constraints that are not primary considerations in other problem settings. This paper provides…

  • Guarantees for Epsilon-Greedy Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation

    arXiv (Cornell University) · 2022 · 26 citations

    Myopic exploration policies such as epsilon-greedy, softmax, or Gaussian noise fail to explore efficiently in some reinforcement learning tasks and yet, they perform well in many others. In fact, in practice, they are often selected as the top choices, due to their simplicity. But, for what tasks do such policies succeed? Can we give theoretical guarantees for their favorable performance? These crucial questions have been scarcely investigated, despite the prominent practical importance of these…

  • Generalized Distributional Alignment Games for Unbiased Answer-Level Fine-Tuning

    arXiv (Cornell University) · 2026-05-04

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    The Distributional Alignment Game framework provides a powerful variational perspective on Answer-Level Fine-Tuning (ALFT). However, standard algorithms for these games rely on estimating logarithmic rewards from small batches, introducing a systematic bias due to Jensen's inequality that can destabilize training. In this paper, we systematically resolve this structural estimation bias. First, we generalize the alignment game to arbitrary Bregman divergences, showing that for a family of geometr…

  • Linear-Core Surrogates: Smooth Loss Functions with Linear Rates for Classification and Structured Prediction

    ArXiv.org · 2026-04-30

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    The choice of loss function in classification involves a fundamental trade-off: smooth losses (like Cross-Entropy) enable fast optimization rates but yield slow square-root consistency bounds, while piecewise-linear losses (like Hinge) offer fast linear consistency rates but suffer from non-differentiability. We propose Linear-Core (LC) Surrogates, a new family of convex loss functions that resolve this tension by stitching a linear core to a smooth tail. We prove that these surrogates are diffe…

  • Balancing fairness: learning with conflicting objectives and user feedback

    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · 2026-03-12

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Large-scale learning systems are often evaluated across multiple, sometimes conflicting, objectives. How can we effectively learn and optimize such complex systems with potentially incompatible goals? Moreover, how do we improve these systems when user feedback, potentially highlighting previously unaddressed issues, becomes available? We propose a novel theoretical model for learning and optimizing such systems. Instead of relying on a static or predefined trade-off among objectives, our model…

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Corinna Cortes

    Google (United States)

    148 shared
  • Afshin Rostamizadeh

    54 shared
  • Michael Riley

    40 shared
  • Cyril Allauzen

    Google (United States)

    37 shared
  • Vitaly Kuznetsov

    Odessa National Economics University

    35 shared
  • Ananda Theertha Suresh

    35 shared
  • Scott Cheng‐Hsin Yang

    26 shared
  • Yishay Mansour

    23 shared

Labs

Awards & honors

  • Best Paper Award EC 2025
  • NeurIPS 2025 Oral

Similar researchers at New York University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Mehryar Mohri

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup