Upload your resume. PhdFit's six research agents compare your background with faculty profiles, recent publications, lab focus, and outreach opportunities, then rank professors with evidence you can review.
Resume-aware matchingEvidence from recent researchOutreach drafts included
Advisor Match Brief Resume uploaded
Resume signals5 found
NLPHCIFairnessGraph MLPyTorch
Six-agent analysisRunning
Axel · Candidate AnalystResume parsed
Nova · Professor ResearcherRecent papers
Echo · Match ExplainerEvidence linked
Atlas · Strategy AdvisorFit ranked
Lyra · Outreach WriterDraft queued
Juno · Meeting Prep CompilerNext step ready
SC
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · NLP & interpretability
91
fit
Fairness + NLP projects overlap with her recent work.
Strong methods fit: model evaluation and interpretability.
Clear outreach angle for current trustworthy AI research.
Outreach angle
Ask how her lab is extending interpretability methods into fairness audits for real-world AI systems.
Mark Mazower is the Ira D. Wallach Professor of History at Columbia University, specializing in modern Greece, 20th-century Europe, and international history. His research interests include the historical evolution of the Greek islands over the long term. He comments on international affairs and reviews books for various prominent publications such as the Financial Times, the Nation, the London Review of Books, and the New York Review of Books. Mazower has authored several notable books, including 'The Greek Revolution: 1821 and the Making of Modern Europe,' which won the Duff Cooper Prize, and 'What You Did Not Tell: A Russian Past and the Journey Home,' a family history published in 2017. He is also involved in cultural and academic initiatives, serving as the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Director of the Columbia Institute for Ideas and Imagination, which fosters collaboration among scholars, artists, writers, composers, and filmmakers. Mazower is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Fellow of the British Academy, and he has received numerous awards and honors for his contributions to history and scholarship.
Mark Mazower’s contribution dissects the role of thinking about the future, particularly in the critical period of the second half of the 19th century, in shaping the city’s modern identity. The gradual inclusion of Thessaloniki in the global capitalist economy brought with it a teleological idea of History and the modernist idea of progress which began to make an impact upon the city in concrete ways. The demolition of the medieval walls and the expansion of the port under an active governor, Sabri Pasha, during the 1870s, signaled a more active role for the state in shaping this future. Even more ambitious was the urban planning of Ernest Hébrard after the 1912–1913 Balkan Wars and the 1917 fire. As Thessaloniki bifurcated between a traditional Upper City and a European Lower City, it also expanded outwards with the new European neighborhoods, primarily toward the east. This physical transformation proceeded in parallel with the flourishing of nationalism.
Yale University Press eBooks · 2017-10-23 · 1 citations
book1st authorCorresponding
This groundbreaking book investigates the religious issues that businesses confront as they expand their global activity and proposes that corporations can become instruments of peace. Timothy Fort discusses the newly emerging idea of peace through commerce,” and he argues powerfully that today’s businesses have the capacity to foster both peace and religious harmony. Fort asks and answers important questions: How might businesses integrate spirituality into corporate affairs? How can spirituality contribute to the production of high-quality goods and services? What can be done to promote a spiritual connection between employees and their work? Can this be done without provoking religious animosities? What business practices might encourage an atmosphere in which constructive dialogue among spiritual traditions could proceed? The author concludes that by implementing the peaceful practices advocated by religions at their best, businesses can both nurture religious harmony and strengthen their communities.
Este articulo examina los estrechos vinculos que existieron entre el historiador ingles Eric Hobsbawm y los historiadores profesionales de Francia, desde su participacion en el Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Historicas en 1950 hasta su relacion con Fernand Braudel y otros. Demuestra la importancia de la red informal de contactos e influencias que se formo tanto en torno a los dos hombres como entre las nuevas instituciones, en particular la VI seccion de la Ecole pratique des hautes etudes [Escuela practica de altos estudios] y la revista Past and Present, que ayudaron a fundar y con las que se asociaron. Esta red sirvio de catalizador para la profesion de historiador a ambos lados del Atlantico y transformo la forma en que se organizaba la ciencia historica. Sus miembros, inicialmente unidos por su interes comun y nunca desmentido en la historia economica y capitalista, fueron los principales promotores de la historia social, que se convirtio en un tema dominante en los campos historicos premodernos y modernos a partir de la decada de 1970. Estas transformaciones intelectuales se derivaron del valor que se le dio a la historia, que ahora se consideraba una ciencia social por derecho propio.
Cet article étudie les liens étroits entre l’historien anglais Eric Hobsbawm et les historiens professionnels en France, de sa participation au Congrès international des sciences historiques de 1950 à ses rapports avec Fernand Braudel et quelques autres. Il démontre l’importance du réseau informel de contacts et d’influences qui se forma tant autour des deux hommes qu’entre les nouvelles institutions, notamment la VI e section de l’École pratique des hautes études et la revue Past and Present , qu’ils aidèrent à fonder et auxquelles ils étaient associés. Ce réseau servit de catalyseur à la profession d’historien des deux côtés de l’Atlantique et transforma la façon dont les sciences historiques étaient organisées. Réunis au départ par leur intérêt partagé et jamais démenti pour l’histoire économique et l’histoire du capitalisme, ses membres furent au cœur de la promotion de l’histoire sociale, qui devint un sujet dominant des champs historiques prémoderne et moderne à partir des années 1970. Ces bouleversements intellectuels découlaient de la valeur accordée à l’histoire, considérée désormais comme une science sociale en tant que telle.
