
About
Mark Algee Hewitt is an Associate Professor of English at Stanford University and serves as the Director of the Center for Spatial and Textual Analysis (CESTA), the Stanford Literary Lab, and the Director of Graduate Studies for the Program in Modern Thought and Literature. His research focuses on the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in England and Germany, aiming to combine literary criticism with digital and quantitative analyses of literary texts. He is particularly interested in the history of aesthetic theory, the development and transmission of aesthetic and philosophic concepts during the Enlightenment and Romantic periods, and the relationship between aesthetic theory and poetry of the long eighteenth century. With a background in English literature and computer science, Dr. Hewitt has worked on projects that integrate literary interpretation with quantitative analysis. His current book project, The Afterlife of the Sublime, explores the history of the sublime by analyzing over 11,000 texts from the long eighteenth century to trace its discursive patterns and the reasons for the term's disappearance at the end of the Romantic period. He has also been involved in collaborative projects such as the Book History BiblioGraph, a dynamic online resource visualizing connections in Book History, and the Werther Topologies, which aims to identify lexical patterns influenced by Goethe’s Sorrows of Young Werther. Dr. Hewitt has taught courses in literary history and…
Research topics
- Sociology
- Biology
- Demography
- Statistics
- Geography
- Computer Science
- Mathematics
- Archaeology
- Data science
- Genetics
Selected publications
Journal of Forensic Sciences · 2021 · 27 citations
Senior authorCorrespondingUsing a sample of anonymized U.S. forensic anthropology cases (n = 251) from the FADAMA database, we assess the degree of concordance between decedents' social identifiers and anthropologists' continental-based classifications. We report high success rates (>90%) that generally support previous findings, yet we acknowledge the limitations of assessing "ancestry" accuracy based on resolved cases and draw attention to situations in which our methods fail. For example, forensic anthropologists achi…
Representing Race and Ethnicity in American Fiction, 1789-1920
Journal of Cultural Analytics · 2020-12-18 · 23 citations
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingOur project, which aims to reconstruct racial discourse in American literature, tracks three critical aspects of the representation of race and ethnicity in a corpus of over 18,000 American novels published between 1789 and 1920. First, we provide a historically sensitive account of the ethnicities that most occupied the nation’s racial imaginary, registering how different ethnic groups were perceived to be biologically, geographically, or socially linked. Second, we track the descriptive terms…
American Journal of Physical Anthropology · 2021 · 11 citations
Senior authorCorrespondingAbstract Objectives Age‐at‐death estimation provides biological anthropologists with fundamental biographic information to help resolve various theoretical and practical questions about both individual expression and populational trends in present and past contexts. Particularly, researchers interested in reconstructing past populations' mortality profiles have favored using Boldsen and colleagues' Transition Analysis (TA2), as the method provides both methodological and statistical solutions fo…
Forensic Science International Synergy · 2020 · 3 citations
Senior authorCorrespondingAs part a body donation program, blood samples were collected and stored on untreated (non-FTA) blood cards. The blood cards were evaluated in terms of DNA preservation and STR typing success with resulting profiles assessed with special consideration given to profile matching for positive identification and biogeographic ancestry estimation. While STR profiles were successfully generated for all samples, results indicate that the time interval between date of death and sample collection have an…
Debates in the digital humanities · 2024-06-20 · 2 citations
bookBringing together leading experts from across North America and Europe, _Computational Humanities_ redirects debates around computation and humanities digital scholarship from dualistic arguments to nuanced discourse centered around theories of knowledge and power. This volume is organized around four questions: Why or why not pursue computational humanities? How do we engage in computational humanities? What can we study using these methods? Who are the stakeholders? <br><br> Recent advances in…
Frequent coauthors
- 344 shared
Graciela S. Cabana
Hudson Institute
- 343 shared
Anne L. Grauer
Loyola University Chicago
- 343 shared
Leslie C. Aiello
The University of Tokyo
- 343 shared
Trudy R. Turner
John Wiley & Sons (United States)
- 343 shared
Kristi Lewton
University of Southern California
- 343 shared
Joe Tomaszewski
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
- 26 shared
Dennis E. Slice
Florida State University
- 20 shared
Jieun Kim
Similar researchers at Stanford University
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Mark Algee Hewitt
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup
