Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Lynn Vavreck

Lynn Vavreck

· Professor (by courtesy)

University of California, Los Angeles · Communication Studies

Active 2000–2026

h-index32
Citations4.0k
Papers9936 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Lynn Vavreck — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Lynn Vavreck is a professor (by courtesy) at UCLA in the Department of Communication. Her work focuses on whether political messages affect election outcomes. She has written four books about campaigns, with her latest titled THE GAMBLE, which discusses the 2012 presidential election. Her research includes conducting advertising field experiments, running large panel surveys, and collecting passive-tracking data on people's media exposure. Vavreck has watched every presidential campaign ad ever made and read every stump speech given from 1952 to 2000. Her educational background includes a Ph.D., M.S., and M.A. in Political Science from the University of Rochester, as well as a B.S. in Political Science from Arizona State University.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Political Science
  • Business
  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Advertising
  • Social Science
  • Computer Security
  • Law
  • Sociology

Selected publications

  • The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments

    Science Advances · 2020 · 170 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Evidence across social science indicates that average effects of persuasive messages are small. One commonly offered explanation for these small effects is heterogeneity: Persuasion may only work well in specific circumstances. To evaluate heterogeneity, we repeated an experiment weekly in real time using 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign advertisements. We tested 49 political advertisements in 59 unique experiments on 34,000 people. We investigate heterogeneous effects by sender (candida…

  • Moderates

    American Political Science Review · 2022 · 97 citations

    Moderates are often overlooked in contemporary research on American voters. Many scholars who have examined moderates argue that these individuals are only classified as such due to a lack of political sophistication or conflicted views across issues. We develop a method to distinguish three ways an individual might be classified as moderate: having genuinely moderate views across issues, being inattentive to politics or political surveys, or holding views poorly summarized by a single liberal–c…

  • The Effect of Television Advertising in United States Elections

    American Political Science Review · 2021 · 66 citations

    We provide a comprehensive assessment of the influence of television advertising on United States election outcomes from 2000–2018. We expand on previous research by including presidential, Senate, House, gubernatorial, Attorney General, and state Treasurer elections and using both difference-in-differences and border-discontinuity research designs to help identify the causal effect of advertising. We find that televised broadcast campaign advertising matters up and down the ballot, but it has m…

  • Protecting the integrity of survey research

    PNAS Nexus · 2023 · 25 citations

    Although polling is not irredeemably broken, changes in technology and society create challenges that, if not addressed well, can threaten the quality of election polls and other important surveys on topics such as the economy. This essay describes some of these challenges and recommends remediations to protect the integrity of all kinds of survey research, including election polls. These 12 recommendations specify ways that survey researchers, and those who use polls and other public-oriented s…

  • Perceptions of COVID-19 Risk: How Did People Adapt to the Novel Risk?

    Medical Decision Making · 2024-01-13 · 7 citations

    articleOpen access

    BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of how risk perceptions changed as the US population gained experience with COVID-19. The objectives were to examine risk perceptions and determine the factors associated with risk perceptions and how these changed over the first 18 mo of the pandemic. METHODS: Seven cross-sectional online surveys were fielded between May 2020 and October 2021. The study included a population-weighted sample of 138,303 US adults drawn from a market research platform, wi…

Frequent coauthors

  • John Sides

    45 shared
  • Seth J. Hill

    Center for the Study of Democracy

    28 shared
  • Karen Sepucha

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    25 shared
  • Alexander Coppock

    Yale University

    23 shared
  • Ryan Baxter-King

    University of California, Los Angeles

    23 shared
  • Chris Tausanovitch

    21 shared
  • Michael Tesler

    University of California, Irvine

    18 shared
  • Arash Naeim

    UCLA Medical Center

    16 shared

Similar researchers at University of California, Los Angeles

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Lynn Vavreck

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup