
Kevin Kelly
· ProfessorCarnegie Mellon University · Philosophy
Active 1967–2024
Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.
About
Kevin T. Kelly is a Professor and Director of the Center for Formal Epistemology at Carnegie Mellon University, within the Department of Philosophy. His research focuses on the philosophical and mathematical foundations of scientific reasoning, particularly examining Ockham's razor and realism, the role of simplicity in theory choice, and the formal modeling of epistemic processes. Kelly's work explores how empirical simplicity reflects nature's capacity to guide scientists through successive theory revisions, employing point set topology as a mathematical framework. His ongoing projects include the Ockham project supported by the John Templeton Foundation. Kelly has contributed extensively to the philosophy of science, epistemology, and logic, addressing topics such as belief revision, the relationship between qualitative and quantitative beliefs, and the epistemological implications of uncomputability and the problem of induction. His research also investigates the learning power of belief revision, the formal semantics of epistemic logic, and the analogy between empirical and formal reasoning. Throughout his career, Kelly has developed theories on how scientific methods are truth-conducive, the nature of inquiry, and the logical structure of scientific justification, making significant contributions to the understanding of scientific rationality and the formal underpinnings of epistemology.
Research topics
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Telecommunications
- Geography
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Philosophy
- Geodesy
- Physics
- Epistemology
Selected publications
The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future
2016-01-01 · 187 citations
book1st authorCorrespondingBecoming -- Cognifying -- Flowing -- Screening -- Accessing -- Sharing -- Filtering -- Remixing -- Interacting -- Tracking -- Questioning -- Beginning
Why Probability Does Not Capture the Logic of Scientific Justification
Figshare · 2018-06-29 · 34 citations
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingDepartment of Philosophy technical report
The Learning Power of Belief Revision
Research Showcase @ Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon University) · 2018-01-01 · 22 citations
articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding<em>Belief revision theory</em> aims to describe how one should change one’s beliefs when they are contradicted by newly input information. The guiding principle of belief revision theory is to change one’s prior beliefs as little as possible in order to maintain consistency with the new information. Learning theory focuses, instead, on <em>learning power</em>: the ability to arrive at <em>true</em> beliefs in a wide range of possible environments. The goal of this paper is to bridge the two app…
Realism, rhetoric, and reliability
Synthese · 2016-04-01 · 20 citations
article1st authorLearning Theory and Epistemology
2016-01-01 · 17 citations
book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding
Recent grants
Ockham's Razor: A New Justification
NSF · $104k · 2008–2011
Frequent coauthors
- 26 shared
Clark Glymour
- 18 shared
Peter Spirtes
Carnegie Mellon University
- 15 shared
Richard Scheines
Carnegie Mellon University
- 12 shared
S. Sivaram Kaushik
- 12 shared
Bastiaan Driehuys
Duke University
- 10 shared
H. Page McAdams
- 9 shared
Zackary I. Cleveland
- 6 shared
G. Metz
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Awards & honors
- John Templeton Foundation grant (supporting ongoing work)
Similar researchers at Carnegie Mellon University
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Kevin Kelly
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup
