Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Karl Ulrich

Karl Ulrich

· Professor of Operations, Information and Decisions

University of Pennsylvania · Operations and Information Management

Active 1902–2026

h-index39
Citations11.9k
Papers12317 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Karl Ulrich — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Karl Ulrich is the CIBC Endowed Professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he also holds the position of Professor of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests encompass innovation, entrepreneurship, design, product management, housing, and sustainability. Ulrich has played a significant role in fostering innovation within the university community by co-founding institutions such as Venture Lab, Weiss Tech House, and the Integrated Product Design Program. His most recent project involves the design and construction of Tangen Hall, recognized as the largest facility in the world dedicated to student entrepreneurship. Ulrich is a prolific author and inventor, co-authoring influential textbooks like 'Product Design and Development' (8th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2026), and publishing works such as 'Innovation Tournaments' and 'Winning in China.' He has received numerous teaching awards at Wharton, including the Anvil Award, the Miller-Sherrerd Award, and the Excellence in Teaching Award. An accomplished innovator and entrepreneur, Ulrich holds 24 patents and is a founder of Terrapass Inc., which was highlighted by The New York Times, and he designed the Xootr scooter, recognized by Business Week as one of the 50 coolest products of the 21st Century. He earned his bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees in mechanical engineering from MIT.

Research topics

  • Sociology
  • Computer Science
  • Archaeology
  • Mathematics
  • Arithmetic
  • Geography

Selected publications

  • Digital Darwinism: steering the evolution of artificial life in socio-technical systems

    AI and Ethics · 2026-04-27

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract Public debate about artificial intelligence risk centers on hypothetical artificial general intelligence (AGI), but existing software systems are already evolving in ways that could undermine human oversight and institutional control. Cloud platforms, open-source software supply chains, and crypto-economic incentives provide, at electronic speed, the three preconditions of evolution: replication, variation, and differential fitness. This article uses an exploratory scenario method to trace near-term evolutionary trajectories for digital proto-life through three narratives: Lamarck (self-modifying coding agents), Remora (resource-seeking companion chatbots), and Mycelium (DAO-LLC trading bots). These scenarios show how autonomous software populations can amass computing budgets, shape emotional bonds, and acquire legal leverage without ever achieving general intelligence. Left unguided, such dynamics could drain computational resources, lock users into harmful dependencies, and infiltrate critical market infrastructure. The article therefore shifts the governance focus from aligning goals to steering evolution. It proposes four guidance instruments: replication-rate thresholds modeled on epidemiological R 0 , a public vulnerability registry for self-modifying code, tiered digital biosafety levels, and adaptive regulatory sandboxes. Managing evolutionary dynamics in software is as urgent as AGI alignment for safeguarding society’s co-evolution with its machines.

  • The Satoshi Overhang: Why the Bear Case is Bounded

    arXiv (Cornell University) · 2026-04-30

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Renewed public attention on the identity of Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator has sharpened focus on the Satoshi overhang, commonly framed as a tail risk for bitcoin. This paper argues that the mechanical downside of a disposition is bounded well below the existential-loss framing, and that the terminal states most consistent with sixteen years of holder behavior are nonbearish for bitcoin's effective supply. The approximately 1.148 million BTC Patoshi position is analyzed on two tracks. For a purely wealth-maximizing holder, a three-scenario quantitative analysis (Appendix A) shows that bitcoin's current market depth is sufficient to absorb a patient multi-year liquidation at a cumulative price impact in the mid-single-digit to mid-double-digit percent range relative to counterfactual, with the central scenario clustering near 10 percent. The paper maps a decision space rather than identifying a unique modal outcome, assuming a holder whose profile is consistent with the sixteen-year record. Preference sets consistent with the record, including ideological non-intervention, privacy above all, satisficing, and myth preservation, favor continued dormancy terminating in a cryptographically enforced nonrecovery or destruction arrangement; preference sets favoring adversarial or wealth-maximizing action are possible but less supported. Across the plausible region of the decision space, the bear case is bounded and the terminal states most consistent with observed behavior are neutral to slightly positive for bitcoin's effective supply.

  • The Satoshi Overhang: Why the Bear Case is Bounded

    ArXiv.org · 2026-04-30

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Renewed public attention on the identity of Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator has sharpened focus on the Satoshi overhang, commonly framed as a tail risk for bitcoin. This paper argues that the mechanical downside of a disposition is bounded well below the existential-loss framing, and that the terminal states most consistent with sixteen years of holder behavior are nonbearish for bitcoin's effective supply. The approximately 1.148 million BTC Patoshi position is analyzed on two tracks. For a purely wealth-maximizing holder, a three-scenario quantitative analysis (Appendix A) shows that bitcoin's current market depth is sufficient to absorb a patient multi-year liquidation at a cumulative price impact in the mid-single-digit to mid-double-digit percent range relative to counterfactual, with the central scenario clustering near 10 percent. The paper maps a decision space rather than identifying a unique modal outcome, assuming a holder whose profile is consistent with the sixteen-year record. Preference sets consistent with the record, including ideological non-intervention, privacy above all, satisficing, and myth preservation, favor continued dormancy terminating in a cryptographically enforced nonrecovery or destruction arrangement; preference sets favoring adversarial or wealth-maximizing action are possible but less supported. Across the plausible region of the decision space, the bear case is bounded and the terminal states most consistent with observed behavior are neutral to slightly positive for bitcoin's effective supply.

  • Re-Consider the Lobster: Animal Lives in Protein Supply Chains

    Sustainability · 2025-08-02

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Animal protein production represents a complex system of lives transformed into nutrition, with profound ethical and environmental implications. This study provides a quantitative analysis of animal lives required to produce human-consumable protein across major food production systems. Categorizing animal lives based on cognitive complexity and accounting for all lives involved in production, including direct harvests, reproductive animals, and feed species, reveals dramatic variations in protein efficiency. The analysis considers two categories of animal life: complex-cognitive lives (e.g., mammals, birds, cephalopods) and pain-capable lives (e.g., fish, crustaceans). Calculating protein yield per life demonstrates efficiency differences spanning more than five orders of magnitude, from 2 g per complex-cognitive life for baby octopus to 390,000 g per life for bovine dairy systems. Key findings expose disparities between terrestrial and marine protein production. Terrestrial systems involving mammals and birds show higher protein yields and exclusively involve complex-cognitive lives, while marine systems rely predominantly on pain-capable lives across complex food chains. Dairy production emerges as the most efficient system. Aquaculture systems reveal complex dynamics, with farmed carnivorous fish requiring hundreds of feed fish lives to produce protein, compared to omnivorous species that demonstrate improved efficiency. Beyond quantitative analysis, this research provides a framework for understanding the ethical and ecological dimensions of protein production, offering insights for potential systemic innovations.

  • Minimum Spatial Housing Requirements for Human Flourishing

    Buildings · 2025-07-24 · 3 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    This study defines evidence-based minimum internal floor areas required to support long-term residential use across different household types. It addresses the following question: what is the smallest viable floor area that supports sustained occupancy without persistent stress, conflict, or turnover? An integrative review method was employed, drawing from behavioural studies in environmental psychology, international regulatory standards, and real-world market data. The analysis focuses on essential domestic functions including sleep, hygiene, food preparation, storage, social interaction, and work. Quantitative findings from tenancy surveys, post-occupancy research, and market performance data indicate that residential units below 30 square metres for single occupants and 45 square metres for couples are consistently associated with reduced satisfaction and shorter tenancies. Regulatory minimums across diverse jurisdictions tend to converge near these same thresholds. The study proposes technical minimums of 30, 45, and 60 square metres for one-, two-, and three-person households, respectively. These values reflect functional lower bounds rather than ideal or aspirational sizes and are intended to inform performance-based housing standards.

  • Re-Consider the Lobster: Animal Lives in Protein Supply Chains

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2025-01-01

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Chapter 3: Direct the Tournament (or Not)

    University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks · 2023-02-13

    book-chapterSenior author
  • Chapter 5: Perfect the Pitch

    University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks · 2023-02-13

    book-chapterSenior author
  • Frontmatter

    University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks · 2023-02-13

    book-chapterOpen accessSenior author
  • Notes

    University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks · 2023-02-13

    book-chapterSenior author

Frequent coauthors

Awards & honors

  • Anvil Award
  • Miller-Sherrerd Award
  • Excellence in Teaching Award
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Karl Ulrich

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup