Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Judy Danielson

· Clinical Professor

University of Minnesota · Oral Sciences

Active 2008–2021

h-index2
Citations31
Papers42 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Judy Danielson — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Eric Schiffman, DDS, MS, is a Professor and the Director of Clinical Research in the School of Dentistry at the University of Minnesota. He has received over $19 million in research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has authored over 60 peer-reviewed publications, 12 book chapters, and holds 3 patents with another pending. His past research as an NIH study principal investigator includes developing and publishing validated Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for the most common TMD, applicable in both clinical and research settings. He has also conducted research on TMD management, assessing the long-term effectiveness of medical management versus comprehensive rehabilitation with and without TMJ surgery in patients with symptomatic TMJ closed lock and limited mouth opening. Additionally, his work includes studying the longitudinal impact of intra-articular TMJ disorders on jaw pain, function, and disability. Schiffman has contributed to the NIH-funded National Dental Practice-Based Research Network by evaluating how dentists manage TMD patients in their practices. His recent projects include developing and clinically testing the Restful Jaw device, a device attached to dental chairs designed to support the jaw during various dental procedures, including third molar surgeries.

Research topics

  • Materials science
  • Environmental science
  • Computer Science
  • Radiology
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Engineering
  • Medicine
  • Process engineering
  • Physics
  • Nanotechnology
  • Acoustics
  • Chemistry

Selected publications

  • Characterization and mitigation of aerosols and spatters from ultrasonic scalers

    The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2021 · 30 citations

    • Materials science
    • Environmental science
    • Acoustics
  • Characterization and mitigation of aerosols and splatters from ultrasonic scalers

    medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021 · 2 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Materials science
    • Environmental science

    Abstract Background Dental procedures often produce aerosols and splatter which have the potential to transmit pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. The existing literature is limited. Methods Aerosols and splatter were generated from an ultrasonic scaling procedure on a dental mannequin and characterized by two optical imaging methods – digital inline holography (DIH) and laser sheet imaging (LSI). Capture efficiencies of various aerosol mitigation devices were evaluated and compared. Results The ultrasonic scaling procedure generates a wide size range of aerosols up to a few hundred micrometers and occasional large splatter which emit at low velocity (mostly below 3 m/s). Use of a saliva ejector (SE) and high-volume evacuator (HVE) resulted in 63% and 88% of overall reduction respectively while an extraoral local extractor (ELE) resulted in a reduction of 96% at the nominal design flow setting. Conclusions The study results showed that the use of ELE or HVE significantly reduced aerosol and splatter emission. The use of HVE generally requires an additional person to assist a hygienist, while an ELE can be operated “hands-free” when a dental hygienist is performing ultrasonic scaling and other operations. Practical Implications An extraoral local extractor aids in the reduction of aerosols and splatters during ultrasonic scaling procedures, potentially reducing transmission of oral or respiratory pathogens, like SARS-CoV-2. Position and airflow of the device are important to effective aerosol mitigation.

  • Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability

    Clinical and Experimental Dental Research · 2017-12-01 · 5 citations

    articleOpen access

    A primary caretaker is a potential reservoir of bacteria for an infant child and can be evaluated during a child's caries risk assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate an indirect method for assessing Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus (MS) and lactobacillus (LB) levels in a caretaker's saliva. Thirty-eight primary caretakers participated in the study to determine whether a 2-step method to assess the intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in saliva (saliva i-ATP method) predicted higher MS and LB levels. This method was tested against a 1-step swab-based total ATP testing of dental plaque (plaque t-ATP method). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the relationship between specificity and sensitivity of the two diagnostic tests. Although the area under the ROC curves of both the saliva i-APT (0.823) and the plaque t-ATP (0.774) methods were shown to be statistically different (p < .05) than the null hypothesis test of a random coin flip, the diagnostic predictability of the ATP tests to assess high levels of MS and LB remained low. The optimal cutoff, which was defined by the Youden index, for the saliva i-ATP method produced a sensitivity/specificity of 60.7/100.0 for MS and 78.6/88.9 for LB. Applying these results to populations of low or high bacterial level prevalence produced undesirable positive and negative predictive values for future potential patients. A pair-wise comparison of both area under the ROC curve values of the saliva i-ATP and plaque t-ATP did not find a statistically significant difference in using one test over the other (MS, p = .629; LB, p = .737). The findings of this study can educate dental clinicians that diagnostic tests, such as the 2-step saliva i-ATP method, can be found to be statistically significant but not ideal for patient use in terms of diagnostic predictability.

  • How to submit preclinical data to ODE

    2008-07-01 · 1 citations

    articleSenior author

Frequent coauthors

  • David Y.H. Pui

    University of Minnesota

    3 shared
  • Jiarong Hong

    University of Minnesota

    2 shared
  • Qinghui Yuan

    2 shared
  • John Madden

    2 shared
  • Rafael Grazzini Placucci

    University of Minnesota

    2 shared
  • P.S. Olin

    University of Minnesota

    2 shared
  • Qisheng Ou

    University of Minnesota

    2 shared
  • Siyao Shao

    TandemLaunch (Canada)

    2 shared

Labs

  • Division of Periodontology, University of Minnesota School of DentistryPI

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Judy Danielson

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup