About

Dr. Jon C. Carr is the Jenkins Distinguished Professor of Entrepreneurship in the Department of Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurship at North Carolina State University. He previously served on the faculties of Texas Christian University and the University of Southern Mississippi, and received his Ph.D. from Mississippi State University. His research focuses on three general domains within management: entrepreneurship, family business, and organizational behavior, as well as the interface between these areas. His work has been published in prominent journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of Applied Psychology, and the Journal of Management. Notably, his research on the concept of 'Familiness' in family businesses, published with Allison Pearson and John Shaw, received an Emerald Citation of Excellence as one of the top fifty articles in management, business, and economics over a five-year span. Dr. Carr has obtained several million dollars in external funding as a principal investigator, including from NASA and the U.S. Department of Labor, and has collaborated with organizations like Lockheed-Martin’s Earth Observation and Exploration Division, mainly on strategic planning, technology transfer, commercialization, and business model innovation. He is actively involved in his professional domain, serving as an associate editor for the Family Business Review and as a reviewer and special issue editor for several journals related to entrepreneurship and family business. With experience as both an entrepreneur and investor, particularly in healthcare and e-commerce, Dr. Carr also works as a consultant on business models, innovation, leadership, and strategic planning, and has spoken publicly on topics related to entrepreneurship, innovation, and family business.

Research topics

• Psychology
• Social psychology
• Political Science
• Sociology
• Computer Science
• Process management
• Management science
• Psychiatry
• Marketing
• Finance
• Psychotherapist
• Economics
• Cognitive psychology
• Clinical psychology
• Business

Selected publications

• A stronger growth mindset of frugality predicts entrepreneurs’ responses to setbacks in resourcefulness behavior

  Journal of Business Venturing Insights · 2026-02-09

  articleSenior author
  PublisherDOI

• Guest editorial: Health and well-being in entrepreneurship: advancing the field through research and practice

  International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · 2026-04-27

  article

  Research on work and employee health has a long tradition (e.g. Spector et al., 2002). This line of research has adopted a variety of viewpoints to include how employees with health concerns or disabilities interact with their work environment (Schinoff et al., n.d.) and how the work environment affects employee health and well-being (Fritz and Sonnentag, 2006) and related theoretical integrations and measurement approaches (e.g. Grant et al., 2007). This interface of health, well-being and the workplace has largely emphasized wage work in organizational entities that have established systems, predictable hierarchies or resources to create healthy workplaces. However, not all organizations have such established practices or resources. In particular, entrepreneurial action and the new venture environment are one important yet still poorly understood context for the interface of well-being and work (Stephan, 2018) and the focus of this special issue.We believe that the unique and challenging context of entrepreneurship can have enhancing and/or inhibiting effects on an individual's health and well-being (e.g. Cardon and Arwine, 2023; Wiklund et al., 2019). This can include the wide and broadly applicable means by which entrepreneurs motivate themselves in the business startup process (Hahn et al., 2012) to how they cope with stresses and strains associated with entrepreneurial activities (Nikolaev et al., 2023). An individual's own physical and mental health characteristics or disabilities are part of what is “brought to the table” as they engage in the uncertainty of entrepreneurial efforts and the extreme competition and risk-taking necessary to succeed influence these individuals in notable ways.Thus, the purpose of this special issue is to offer researchers, regardless of discipline, the opportunity to examine theoretical and empirical questions related to entrepreneurship, health and well-being. This opportunity is informed by previous reviews of this literature stream (Lerman et al., 2021; Stephan et al., 2023; Williamson et al., 2021) and seeks to clarify or expand ongoing conversations related to this topic area. Overall, we hope that the papers presented here offer new ways for researchers and authors to expand their understanding and promote further interest in the entrepreneurship and well-being research and practice interface.Based on our editorial panel and the involvement of noteworthy reviewers of IJEBR, we present 10 papers that reflect several themes related to our special issue topic area. These 10 papers were chosen for their contributions to our special issue focus and have been organized into four general themes. Our first theme centers on theoretical frameworks and systematic reviews that capture the interface of entrepreneurship and health and well-being. These papers include efforts to integrate unexamined theories within the entrepreneurship domain on health and well-being. Our second theme focuses on the entrepreneur themselves and their own characteristics. This theme examines how individual entrepreneurs' characteristics relate to their health and well-being outcomes. Our third theme extends our understanding by examining health and well-being across the entrepreneurial process, including interventions. Finally, we present several papers that are focused on measurement and practice at the intersection of health, well-being and entrepreneurship.Below, we provide summaries of the main themes we identified in our accepted papers. Following these summaries, we discuss our insights and potential future avenues to explore at the interface of health, well-being and entrepreneurship.A key theme from our special issue studies is the broader insights that integrate different theoretical frameworks or provide a review of prior studies, offering new direction for research within the health and well-being literature and entrepreneurship. A short review of these papers and some of their insights is provided below.To begin, a systematic review by Yang et al. (2026) integrates research on family support (FS), work-life balance (WLB), work-family interface (WFI) and entrepreneurial well-being (EWB) using the PRISMA protocol, the SPIDER framework and 47 peer-reviewed empirical studies (1987–2024). Their aim is to bring together these four relatively disconnected literature into a unified conceptual framework, as earlier work consistently shows that family and social roles (conflict as well as enrichment) affect well-being among both employees and entrepreneurs.Their review focuses on three questions: How does FS influence EWB? How does WLB/WFI mediate the FS–EWB relationship? What factors moderate the FS–WLB/WFI–EWB relationship? In other words, the question shifts from whether FS matters to how, when and for whom it influences EWB. Their final unifying framework is a must-read for students of how WLB/WFI mediates between its antecedents (FS) and its outcomes (EWB). This simple but significant framework paves the way for future research avenues such as replication studies, a more dynamic role of FS, identifying entrepreneurial identity and leadership dynamics and investigating the psychological mechanisms underlying the framework and the role of modern ways of working (remotely and digitalized) (Yang et al., 2026).Taken together, the dual role of family and social support in entrepreneurial well-being, acting as both an enrichment resource and a source of conflict, moderated by many (potential) factors, is clearly brought to the fore while integrating diverse theoretical perspectives. Finally, special attention is devoted to the roles of gender and non-Western studies, thereby broadening our understanding of these important constructs beyond Western-oriented studies.Other studies in this issue directly attempt to integrate different theoretical frameworks to create new opportunities to understand and practically impact entrepreneurs and their well-being. One such paper by Jones Christensen and Embry (2026) provides a trauma-informed perspective that demonstrates how trauma exposure may alter the foundational human resource of the new venture – namely, the entrepreneur. This perspective challenges existing operationalizations of what this human capital resource is about. Existing approaches often emphasize characteristics such as education, skills or entrepreneurial experience as means to understand entrepreneurial human capital, but what is missing is the role that prior trauma exposure can play in an entrepreneur's well-being and ultimate success as a new venture founder.To what extent is trauma exposure relevant to entrepreneurial health and well-being? Jones Christensen and Embry (2026) provide compelling evidence that trauma exposure is both widespread and underrecognized and can have powerful consequences to health and well-being for people. Research demonstrates that trauma exposure can have long-lasting effects (e.g. Benjet et al., 2016), and existing research in entrepreneurship can be found in entrepreneurial ecosystems that often have disproportionate exposure to trauma, including refugees and veterans (Shepherd and Williams, 2020; Nafari and Ruebottom, 2025). Thus, their paper moves trauma-related conditions beyond just niche populations to a relevant explanatory factor that can shape entrepreneurial action.In particular, Jones Christensen and Embry (2026) framework emphasizes Herman's trauma theory (Herman, 1992). This theory is roughly composed of three specific patterns of influence related to past trauma exposure. These include (1) hyperarousal, which is the activation of hypervigilance states that can impair concentration and cognitive processing; (2) intrusion, which is the possible episodic “flashbacks” that impair functioning and can affect memory recall, and (3) constriction, which reflects the dissociation or potential reduced emotional engagement that affects motivation or mood. These patterns of influence can co-occur and have significant influence on important entrepreneurial processes to include stakeholder engagement, decision-making and ultimately entrepreneurial well-being (Jones Christensen and Embry, 2026).The implications of the trauma-informed insights of Jones Christensen and Embry (2026) are both significant and provide insights into the role of trauma for the entrepreneur and the stakeholders that influence their success. These include identifying and mitigating trauma through interventional strategies and recognizing that entrepreneurial ecosystems, which often focus on training and skill-building, should also consider implementing trauma-informed care as part of their entrepreneurial development and growth approaches.Finally, a paper focused on theoretical integration is by Sonbol et al. (2026). In their paper, they provide a fascinating theoretical conversation and integration of insights from research on suicide and the perceptions that the psychology of entrepreneurship is generally about self-fulfillment, autonomy and well-being (Stephan, 2018). Rather, their paper challenges some prevailing assumptions by highlighting how the entrepreneurial process can be highly influenced by failure, burnout, isolation and other negative well-being characteristics to the degree to which they could lead to suicidal ideation (Sonbol et al., 2026).To accomplish this integration, Sonbol et al. (2026) leverage several theoretical frameworks that touch on the ways in which entrepreneurial stress and extreme contexts can lead to suicidal ideation. These include the interpersonal theory of suicide (Joiner, 2005), the integrated motivational-volitional model (O'Conner, 2011), the three-step theory (Klonsky and May, 2015) and fluid vulnerability theory (Rudd, 2006). These frameworks are reviewed and collectively demonstrate an overall point – that suicidal risk is a cumulative and psychological and suicidal ideation by entrepreneurs can be by these et al. (2026) provide several important insights into this These insights include the of cognitive the for with to entrepreneurial mental health and the of suicide and the for specific mental and social support within entrepreneurial ecosystems to this Overall, their work is an attempt to attention to the that are many suicide risk is both a for entrepreneurs and yet an development of theoretical frameworks and insights from reviews can also lead to specific studies that examine how entrepreneurs' individual characteristics or lead different health and well-being outcomes. of our studies provide insights into this key we present is on the role of in entrepreneurial and In the investigating at work has a long studies focus on of entrepreneurs their and is to they and are for their In their and (2026) aim to how entrepreneurs by and this entrepreneurs were in health and are to the effects of the four of theory is to understand the together, the to the literature on entrepreneurial well-being and In other words, the a first at perceptions of entrepreneurs different stakeholders and extends efforts to psychological for the well-being of entrepreneurs and 2023; and Wiklund et al., 2019). A is that perceptions of from and are relevant to part of our special we also that the entrepreneurs as they from wage work to entrepreneurship has implications for their well-being. This as entrepreneurship (e.g. et al., is relevant to entrepreneurial success and well-being et al., all entrepreneurs to the entrepreneurship In from work in a way entrepreneurship. This is in our as entrepreneurship, which is for the dual roles potential that entrepreneurs as they from one domain to (e.g. et al., 2023). are cognitive associated with this experience and et al. (2026) provide a compelling on and entrepreneurs' theory and et al. (2026) and a model examining the cognitive by entrepreneurs with a of entrepreneurs in Their research motivation is important – How does cognitive create psychological on and to what degree does this have and implications for as they through the entrepreneurship paper an both resource from their potential dual and cognitive as they both in lead to cognitive and are potential negative implications for entrepreneurs et al., of health, stress and as their their that cognitive can to psychological and that the related to their cognitive can be important for entrepreneurial individual studies how individual entrepreneurs' own characteristics can influence their well-being and venture success. this line of we include studies in this special issue that explore broader entrepreneurial processes and their implications for well-being. These studies are provided and entrepreneurial are often related to processes to context and in this processes and activities that entrepreneurs engage in to well-being including and process, and play and identity and purpose paper by et al. the roles of and mechanisms in entrepreneurs' health and on the model and to about how and may to shape entrepreneurs' and work and is as a for both in and processes through a experience from the with to authors support for both the of the resource of entrepreneurs' work an that is by is also support for the which entrepreneurs' experience of emotional to their experience of work stress in and moderated the such that entrepreneurs stress from emotional on with the previous in to its of enhancing and work also entrepreneurs' experience of work in reduced in the that entrepreneurs work in fluid and dynamic that entrepreneurs to the authors to the of these dynamics and the of and from one to the In this and our understanding of the dynamics and process et al., et al., 2021) through which entrepreneurs their work to and also the of the and for while highlighting resource dynamics and through the the also extends the work on the of processes for new into as an important and a psychological resource that can the by entrepreneurs in their This to to our understanding of the role of for entrepreneurs et al., 2021) and past research that effects of on entrepreneurs' well-being, and et al., et al., et al., et al., 2025). of to as a is a of the or we include the role of entrepreneurial play as psychological and in the well-being of entrepreneurs in et al., This between of play and and and play and approaches to within the business on the of resources theory the these play as resources that entrepreneurs' well-being and empirical is on from business in to capture entrepreneurial which that and and social resources is to stress is important to their et al. (2026) this framework for entrepreneurship, a context by and between work and for business unique et al., 2023). play is identified as an resource directly to work into and work while play provides and are to how the of play and relate to well-being and and and among by et al. (2026) that play influences psychological well-being, and play paper demonstrates the of workplace play in entrepreneurship play may as a resource for and future entrepreneurial success. also by measurement and highlighting the impact of play on entrepreneurs' mental the of integrating and activities into entrepreneurial Overall, their paves the way for future research in diverse and business studies could clarify how shape the role and impact of play in entrepreneurial of entrepreneurial well-being processes is provided by et al. (2026). they a to understand how entrepreneurs the they as they are by contexts and their own individual and of entrepreneurs and a theory they a entrepreneurial process model to how entrepreneurs work through their well-being This model an that how, their entrepreneurial they and both their themselves and their entrepreneurial in a et al., point that they is that well-being is not just an entrepreneur has does not but a of efforts that they and that their their identity and related factors This process is relevant for entrepreneurs physical and mental well-being these entrepreneurs through their entrepreneurial this process and several et al., these with the challenges that entrepreneurs in and social with and other these entrepreneurs to both and their they through this their understanding of their well-being and to their their venture and also themselves as entrepreneurs can as these entrepreneurs their success to from individual and to as and within their own entrepreneurial ecosystems et al., these their well-being a for among other entrepreneurs with and of is a key through et (2026) Their a understanding of the role that well-being can play for entrepreneurs from to entrepreneurial and final theme focuses on measurement and which an in this future studies to and well-being theoretical the of measurement be provide such studies in this special issue as of these et al. (2026) a mental well-being for entrepreneurs the well-being point of is that a short for entrepreneurs is an important first which to support entrepreneurs' well-being can for the general for specific mental and for employees as part of health such is for on a literature review with et al. (2026) the entrepreneur well-being in three they and with a of they entrepreneurs to the as well as and with a of mental health and entrepreneur of their and and they the of the entrepreneur well-being in a of the entrepreneur well-being of that and which in three key mental health negative and well-being and and functioning and In of a of factor that the three key were and were by a factor the from well-being to This and the authors discuss how this with the entrepreneur mental well-being literature (Stephan, 2018). part of the development process related to and to were from the to of the entrepreneur well-being in ways with the of mental health at both and with all mental health challenges (e.g. and but not with and with business were but in the et al. (2026) how the entrepreneur well-being a for entrepreneurs for general mental health concerns that an important to and entrepreneurs' mental of the is a key the and that entrepreneurs can entrepreneurs to engage with their mental entrepreneur well-being can also entrepreneur from to and the of entrepreneur mental well-being and provide support mental well-being is we offer an focused on the of a with to well-being and entrepreneurship – entrepreneurial et al., In their they question a in the that entrepreneurs are more with their an that is often by authors a which in entrepreneurial contexts individuals present themselves as and to and other stakeholders (Stephan, 2018). the of by integrating in to provide a more of entrepreneurial well-being (Stephan, on a including entrepreneurs at in and In the first entrepreneurs are to a in the of an to is using with et al., by a and with and including health with with and is using a from organizational psychology research and first the established that entrepreneurs However, the shows that more among among that such as health, and social well for entrepreneurs' In as an important of but this is not specific to as it also to for when well-being. Finally, the does not the in which that may more in the beyond et al., a theoretical the by challenging the on in research on entrepreneurial well-being. for and to more capture the mechanisms underlying entrepreneurs' (Stephan, a the that entrepreneur well-being support should not on general evidence but with the that may for entrepreneurs et al., 2026).The summaries provided capture the insights that the authors provide to our special These authors also offer direction for future research in this literature area. of these focus on approaches to for more and to expand our understanding of important theoretical associated with their a more focus on research et al. (2026) for future research to to capture potential effects and also the of different strategies (e.g. and social and how stress and processes of the entrepreneur may to or in to and et al. (2026) also future research that which could how play resources affect entrepreneurs at different of their or business This future research could on the mechanisms through which different of play and influence psychological outcomes and how individual or business characteristics moderate the between entrepreneurial play and well-being. This could in explore broader of entrepreneurial and how entrepreneurial play affects organizational employee well-being, organizational and researchers focus on future approaches that provide more or different et al. (2026) that future research should the entrepreneur well-being they in studies and A be to and for the entrepreneur well-being which could as future research should that of risk and thereby the with which support and should be the authors that future studies could the of their by entrepreneurs in different using and using a to the such as of mental health challenges and for business In should that both individual (e.g. cognitive and and support (e.g. and future work should also that integrate and processes and into practices that entrepreneurial well-being as a the of a Overall, these authors associated with a more that seeks to capture across contexts and entrepreneurial with more on measurement and research special issue contributions offer insights into how entrepreneurship well-being and new and well-being the processes through which these shape well-being and conditions and to the measurement of entrepreneur well-being. A topic that for its and that important opportunities for future research is understanding the consequences of entrepreneurs' well-being. Research of entrepreneurship has generally well-being to et al., 2005), the in the workplace can be we may and 2018). may have more consequences for in entrepreneurship and research on this is (Stephan, 2018). In organizational and resources but the extreme context of entrepreneurship and Arwine, is a all researchers in well-being its consequences more as entrepreneurship researchers and a for and enhancing entrepreneurs' well-being, we should also have a understanding of how and when entrepreneurs' well-being and can be a resource or for entrepreneurial action and may be of well-being beyond which are with negative on et al., of well-being with outcomes and with social outcomes such as the well-being of entrepreneurs' and are are also opportunities for future research to leverage new theoretical approaches beyond theory and and which are the main theories in the existing research on the consequences of entrepreneurs' well-being (Stephan, 2018). an evidence about the consequences of entrepreneurs' well-being is important for it can entrepreneur and that entrepreneurs' well-being matters and is is a for research that well-being to entrepreneurial and growth outcomes in different social and contexts while potential and work on entrepreneurship in particular, examine how these dynamics for and entrepreneur (e.g. gender and and within ecosystems, on trauma-informed and that exposure to and resources (Jones Christensen and Embry, future studies could explore how of affect and and support conditions among these entrepreneurs and whether such are more in specific ecosystems (e.g. and social or work the by when and for whom well-being is a or in entrepreneurial success et al., and which and (Yang et al., are to with well-being for a more diverse of thereby and et al., for which affect not just this literature stream but social in include the replication challenges associated with empirical of our health and entrepreneurial is well established that studies on a may or emphasizes the of replication of within a and replication replication and of prior as more research strategies et al., 2021; et al., et al., 2023). of the contributions to the present special issue are by an replication This a a that a theoretical by and for entrepreneurs as well as for to support or influence – and family – it is to whether such are or reflect a or from systematic replication in and psychology has been that a of to is to that entrepreneurship research be to these in and entrepreneurship research often focused on theoretical development of a of and is in several of our studies presented an on new theory may at the of whether existing theories across diverse contexts or whether theoretical from replication themselves this to and more and to some a for both authors and – of are A and notable development is the by An of a as which replication as a entrepreneurship theory and practice have a for and this we the hope that future research more that the with be by attention to and that concerns about replication be with and many these in the the of and the of can it to in final our own on the implications of health and well-being in entrepreneurial have the of the between entrepreneurship and and attention to However, this at and to integrate into a unified This that the on further of empirical also to for theoretical development of to the the that the entrepreneurs with their work – and more with their – has a one that may affect health in both its and its by and emphasizes that venture a dual that of an and that of a the individual's within and through that may be in a and to the of the individual of this of the entrepreneurial it is possible to consider that key – venture and business – as they engage and the empirical can be from this suicide risk in of business et al., 2021) be reduced to it may also be as the of a in the entrepreneur's identity significant in risk among business the an to a of et al., business may be in of research on theory to understand the of a family the of the between the entrepreneur and the of venture may be understood as of identity and as a process of in which the of both an and a contributions of the of offer a relevant conceptual framework for understanding these of venture or are not they may affect the entrepreneur's identity their when that and that human are other their to understand individuals through their through a This with the by what the entrepreneur does what the entrepreneur a this that an of entrepreneurial may this entrepreneurial health be reduced to a simple of stress or may be understood as from the that entrepreneurial in the of and individual by a for autonomy or by to entrepreneurial engagement a of and of that this This may a resource – a source of and – and also a source of vulnerability when the is or research avenues from this studies could to the of the entrepreneurial to examine the health effects of and to more organizational and with other may also clarify what is specific to entrepreneurial Finally, such a perspective the of support mechanisms not to but also to the of entrepreneurial the entrepreneur through the of health ultimately means in their human to a or organizational an may to entrepreneurship research by it within a more framework to and the of

  PublisherDOI

• I'll prove you wrong! The underdog effect as an antecedent to entrepreneurial action and venture persistence

  Journal of Business Venturing · 2026-02-05 · 1 citations

  articleOpen access
  PublisherDOI

• Research to knowledge-driven action: practical relevance of entrepreneurship research

  Journal of Knowledge Management · 2026-02-13

  article

  Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the “lost in translation” issue in management research, focusing on how strategic entrepreneurship research translates theoretical insights into actionable implications for practitioners. While management articles routinely include a section on practical implications, the authors explore the extent of these implications in guiding practitioners’ knowledge and decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct a qualitative meta-analysis of 232 articles published in a leading entrepreneurship journal over the past decade. Each article’s practical implications section is coded along several characteristics of practical implications. The authors then synthesize patterns through link analysis and co-occurrences. Findings The findings of this study differ across various practical implication characteristics. The authors find that articles often look to extend managers’ knowledge (56.50%) of the phenomena of interest (change the way practitioners think) and give actionable (36%) steps for solutions to problems (change the way practitioners act). To a lesser extent, scholars also provide a fair number of novel practical implications (18.70%), such that they possess counterintuitive results and are generalizable (16.30%) to many contexts. Practical implications The authors offer guidelines for scholars, editors, reviewers, entrepreneurs, managers, policymakers and universities aimed to enhance the relevance of academic findings for real world impact. By improving the clarity and applicability of academic insights, this framework can foster more effective entrepreneurial decision-making, drive innovation adoption and ultimately strengthen economic development and societal welfare through better informed management practices. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first qualitative meta-analysis to deconstruct and evaluate the substance of practical implications in management research. The authors propose a coding framework for future studies to explore theory-to-practice knowledge pathways across management fields, ultimately aiming to bridge the gap between academic research and its real-world applications.

  PublisherDOI

• Entrepreneurial identity formation in family firms: the transgenerational impact of parents’ fear of failure

  Journal of Small Business Management · 2025-04-11 · 3 citations

  articleOpen access

  In this paper, we extend the understanding of transgenerational entrepreneurship by examining how parental influence shapes offspring’s entrepreneurial identity within family firms. Drawing on identity process theory, we posit that family business owners’ entrepreneurial fear of failure conveys identity meaning that affects their offspring’s perception of the parents’ entrepreneurial identity, which in turn influences the centrality of the offspring’s entrepreneurial identity. Additionally, we examine how the offspring’s work experience in the family business moderates this relationship. Analyzing data from 301 parent-offspring pairs in Iranian small- and medium-sized family businesses, we find empirical support for our research model. We discuss implications for both research and practice.

  PublisherOA PDFDOI

• Teaching reuse of existing structures at the University of Sheffield

  2025-06-30

  book-chapterOpen accessSenior author

  In response to the Climate Emergency, and to reflect the fact that many practising Structural Engineers work on existing buildings and other structures, staff from The University of Sheffield set up a new ‘Reuse of existing structures’ module in September 2022. The paper describes the rationale behind the module, the module content, the approach to learning, teaching and assessment., as well as reflecting on the overall success of the module, taking into account the quality of the working submitted and student feedback.

  PublisherOA PDFDOI

• When Entrepreneurship and Employment Collide: Conflicts of Hybrid Entrepreneurs and Their Impact on Wage Employment Satisfaction

  SSRN Electronic Journal · 2025-01-01

  preprintOpen access
  PublisherDOI

• The Biophilia Effect: Expanding Green Horizons in a Global Workplace

  Academy of Management Proceedings · 2025-07-01

  articleOpen access

  This symposium explores the growing evidence that nature contact -- ranging from biophilic office design to immersive outdoor experiences -- may exert profound effects on employee well-being, work engagement, and organizational outcomes. As rapid urbanization continues to limit daily exposure to natural elements, research increasingly points to nature as a powerful yet underexamined resource for sustainable management practice. In this session, five presentations illuminate multiple facets of the “Biophilia Effect.” First, we see how even simple interventions, such as workplace greenery, boost employee energy and dedication. Next, we learn how entrepreneurs and boundaryless workers may strategically leverage nature for real-time recovery. We then turn to an ethnographic study that reveals how specific environmental contexts (e.g., remote islands, mountainous terrain) mold employees’ work-life boundaries. A fourth paper uncovers moral complexities in (animal) caregiving professions, where necessary evils can cause psychological and ethical tension. Finally, we broaden our view by examining user acceptance of wooden housing, underscoring how green innovations can shape both corporate strategies and societal well-being. Collectively, these papers provide timely, high-impact insights for scholars across OB, ONE, and SIM, illustrating how nature-based approaches can enrich individuals’ work experiences, advance sustainable organizational practices, and foster responsible management in a globalized world. Biophilic Design at Work: Investigating How Greenery Supports Employee Engagement Author: Meredith Jordan Pool; Clemson University Author: Robert R Sinclair; Clemson University Detachment vs. Absorption in Nature: A Person-Centered Approach to Employee Recovery Breaks Author: J. Jeffrey Gish; University of Central Florida Author: Ute Stephan; King's College London Author: Jon C. Carr; North Carolina State University Author: Réka Anna Lassu; Pepperdine University Author: Sarah Burrows; Queen's University Author: Jeffrey M. Pollack; North Carolina State University The Topography of Work-Life Boundaries: How Environmental Context Shapes Work-Life Navigation Author: Elena Maria Wong; University of Pennsylvania The Mixed Consequences of Necessary Evils in the Veterinary Profession Author: Carisa Lam; Author: Vanessa Liu; User Acceptance of Wooden Housing: Green Future in the Construction Industry? Author: Malgorzata Iwanczuk-Prost; Wageningen University and Research Author: Emiel F.M. Wubben;

  PublisherOA PDFDOI

• Family Business Leaders' Fear of Failure Can Inhibit Next Gens

  2025-08-28

  articleOpen access
  PublisherOA PDFDOI

• When entrepreneurship and employment collide: Conflicts of hybrid entrepreneurs and their impact on wage employment satisfaction

  Journal of Business Venturing Insights · 2025-08-22 · 1 citations

  articleOpen access

  • We distinguish conflicts from wage activity (WVC) and venture activity (VWC). • We highlight the bi-directional nature of role conflict. • Time allocation predicts where role conflicts are more likely to emerge. • Hybrid entrepreneurs may shift conflicts toward the less prioritized role. • VWC and WVC affect wage employment satisfaction through two distinct mechanisms.

  PublisherDOI

Frequent coauthors

• Jeffrey M. Pollack

  North Carolina State University

  20 shared

• Timothy L. Michaelis

  Northern Illinois University

  16 shared

• Keith M. Hmieleski

  Texas Christian University

  10 shared

• Scott L. Boyar

  University of Alabama at Birmingham

  9 shared

• Allison W. Pearson

  Mississippi State University

  8 shared

• Bennett J. Tepper

  6 shared

• Lewis Sheats

  Saint Louis University

  6 shared

• Brian T. Gregory

  Northern Arizona University

  5 shared

Education

• Ph.D., Entrepreneurship

  North Carolina State University

  2000

• M.S., Entrepreneurship

  University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  1995

• B.S., Business Administration

  University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  1993

Awards & honors

• Emerald Citation of Excellence for research on 'Familiness'…