Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
John Alford

John Alford

· Professor

Rice University · Sociology

Active 1977–2024

h-index30
Citations6.3k
Papers7813 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with John Alford — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

John Alford is a Professor of Political Science at Rice University. His published work primarily focuses on elections and voting behavior, with an emphasis on the American Congress. He has also published in diverse areas such as coal mine safety, pro-natalist policy in Eastern Europe, and the genetics of political ideology. His current research concentrates on the biology of political behavior, including brain science and genetics, as well as the role of evolution in shaping human political behavior. Recent articles by Professor Alford have appeared in prominent journals such as the American Political Science Review, Perspectives on Politics, and the American Journal of Political Science.

Research topics

  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Biology
  • Endocrinology
  • Social psychology
  • Law

Selected publications

  • Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 2014-06-01 · 609 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Disputes between those holding differing political views are ubiquitous and deep-seated, and they often follow common, recognizable lines. The supporters of tradition and stability, sometimes referred to as conservatives, do battle with the supporters of innovation and reform, sometimes referred to as liberals. Understanding the correlates of those distinct political orientations is probably a prerequisite for managing political disputes, which are a source of social conflict that can lead to fr…

  • Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology

    American Journal of Political Science · 2016-04-08 · 187 citations

    article

    Abstract Originally developed to explain cultural variation in moral judgments, moral foundations theory (MFT) has become widely adopted as a theory of political ideology. MFT posits that political attitudes are rooted in instinctual evaluations generated by innate psychological modules evolved to solve social dilemmas. If this is correct, moral foundations must be relatively stable dispositional traits, changes in moral foundations should systematically predict consequent changes in political o…

  • Nonpolitical Images Evoke Neural Predictors of Political Ideology

    Current Biology · 2014-10-30 · 126 citations

    articleOpen access

    Political ideologies summarize dimensions of life that define how a person organizes their public and private behavior, including their attitudes associated with sex, family, education, and personal autonomy [1Jost J.T. Federico C.M. Napier J.L. Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009; 60: 307-337Crossref PubMed Scopus (1055) Google Scholar, 2Haidt J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Religion and Politics. Pantheon, New Yor…

  • Predisposed

    2013-09-23 · 114 citations

    bookSenior author

    Buried in many people and operating largely outside the realm of conscious thought are forces inclining us toward liberal or conservative political convictions. Our biology predisposes us to see and understand the world in different ways, not always reason and the careful consideration of facts. These predispositions are in turn responsible for a significant portion of the political and ideological conflict that marks human history. With verve and wit, renowned social scientists John Hibbing, Ke…

  • The Genetic and Environmental Foundations of Political, Psychological, Social, and Economic Behaviors: A Panel Study of Twins and Families

    Twin Research and Human Genetics · 2015-05-21 · 29 citations

    articleOpen access

    Here we introduce the Genetic and Environmental Foundations of Political and Economic Behaviors: A Panel Study of Twins and Families (PIs Alford, Hatemi, Hibbing, Martin, and Smith). This study was designed to explore the genetic and environmental influences on social, economic, and political behaviors and attitudes. It involves identifying the psychological mechanisms that operate on these traits, the heritability of complex economic and political traits under varying conditions, and specific g…

Frequent coauthors

  • John R. Hibbing

    71 shared
  • Kevin B. Smith

    University of Nebraska–Lincoln

    41 shared
  • Peter Hatemi

    Pennsylvania State University

    24 shared
  • Matthew V. Hibbing

    University of California, Merced

    15 shared
  • Douglas R. Oxley

    Mitchell Institute

    12 shared
  • Lindon J. Eaves

    10 shared
  • Mario J. Scalora

    University of Nebraska–Lincoln

    9 shared
  • Jennifer Miller

    Palo Alto University

    9 shared

Similar researchers at Rice University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with John Alford

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup