Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Jan Schroers

· Robert Higgin ProfessorVerified

Yale University · Materials Science

Active 1995–2026

h-index76
Citations19.5k
Papers36071 last 5y
Funding$2.1M
See your match with Jan Schroers — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Jan Schroers is a professor affiliated with the Schroers Lab at Yale University, specializing in the field of materials science. He holds a B.S. and M.S. in Physics from the University of Cologne, a Ph.D. in Physics from RWTH Aachen, and completed a postdoctoral fellowship in Materials Science at the California Institute of Technology. His academic background reflects a strong foundation in physics and materials science, which underpins his research activities at Yale. The Schroers Lab focuses on advanced materials research, including metallic glasses and other novel materials, although specific details about Professor Schroers' individual research interests and contributions are not explicitly detailed in the provided text.

Research topics

  • Materials science
  • Physics
  • Composite material
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Thermodynamics
  • Metallurgy
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Chemical physics
  • Nanotechnology
  • Machine Learning
  • Mechanics
  • Crystallography
  • Computational chemistry
  • Optics
  • Chemical engineering
  • Biological system
  • Statistical physics
  • Process engineering

Selected publications

  • Size dependent phase selection during thermomechanical nanomolding

    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026-02-19

    datasetOpen access
  • Computational study of density fluctuation-facilitated shear band formation in bulk metallic glasses

    npj Computational Materials · 2026-03-06

    articleOpen access

    Seemingly identical Bulk Metallic Glasses (BMG) often exhibit strikingly different mechanical properties despite having the same composition and fictive temperature. A postulated mechanism underlying these differences is the presence of “defects” and density variations. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce physically realistic and quantitatively controllable density fluctuations in molecular dynamics simulations to systematically examine their role in shear band formation under applied stress. We find that the critical shear strain is strongly dependent on the magnitude and size of the fluctuations, revealing a nonlinear activation behavior associated with localized rejuvenation. This finding also elucidates why, historically, critical shear stresses obtained in simulations have differed so much from those found experimentally, as typical simulations setups might favor unrealistically uniform geometries.

  • Size dependent phase selection during thermomechanical nanomolding

    Open MIND · 2026-02-19 · 1 citations

    dataset
  • Glass Formation During Combinatorial Sputtering in Binary Alloys

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2025-01-01

    preprintOpen accessSenior author
  • Soliquidy: a descriptor for atomic geometrical confusion

    npj Computational Materials · 2025-02-19 · 3 citations

    articleOpen access

    Tailoring material properties often requires understanding the solidification process. Herein, we introduce the geometric descriptor Soliquidy, which numerically captures the Euclidean transport cost between the translationally disordered versus ordered states of a materials. As a testbed, we apply Soliquidy to the classification of glass-forming metal alloys. By extending and combining an experimental library of metallic thin films (glass/no-glass) with the aflow.org computational database (geometrical and energetic information of mixtures) we found that the combination of Soliquity and formation enthalpies generates an effective classifier for glass formation. Such a classifier is then used to tackle a public dataset of metallic glasses showing that the glass-agnostic assumptions of Soliquity can be useful for understanding kinetically-controlled phase transitions.

  • Soliquidy: a descriptor for atomic geometrical confusion

    ArXiv.org · 2025-01-29

    preprintOpen access

    Tailoring material properties often requires understanding the solidification process. Herein, we introduce the geometric descriptor Soliquidy, which numerically captures the Euclidean transport cost between the translationally disordered versus ordered states of a materials. As a testbed, we apply Soliquidy to the classification of glass-forming metal alloys. By extending and combining an experimental library of metallic thin-films (glass/no-glass) with the aflow.org computational database (geometrical and energetic information of mixtures) we found that the combination of Soliquity and formation enthalpies generates an effective classifier for glass formation. Such classifier is then used to tackle a public dataset of metallic glasses showing that the glass-agnostic assumptions of Soliquity can be useful for understanding kinetically-controlled phase transitions.

  • Local Deformation Mapping Reveals Diffusion through Microstructures

    Research Square · 2025-09-16 · 1 citations

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Glass formation during combinatorial sputtering in binary alloys

    Acta Materialia · 2025-06-12 · 3 citations

    articleSenior authorCorresponding
  • High Resolution Mapping of Diffusion Characteristics in General Microstructures

    Diffusion fundamentals. · 2025-11-03

    articleOpen accessSenior author
  • Can Machine Learning Predict the Liquidus Temperature of Binary Alloys?

    Acta Materialia · 2025-01-01

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Accurate prediction of the liquidus temperature ( ) of alloys remains a challenge despite numerous theoretical models. Here, we explore and analyze the degree to which machine learning, ML, strategies can be used to predict . We use established literature data on liquidus temperatures of 85523 binary alloys to train ML models using various feature vectors to represent the alloys. While our results are comparable to previous studies, the persistent ~8% error underscores the limitations of current ML models for practical usage. The suboptimal accuracy leads us to question how well-defined the problem is and to what degree fundamental limitations prevent us from attaining more accurate predictions. We identify two major challenges in predicting the liquidus temperature of binary alloys through supervised ML algorithms. One challenge is representing the relevant characteristics of an alloy that determines liquidus temperature through appropriate features. The other fundamental challenge is the discreteness of atoms properties. The difference between two elements and thereby alloy systems is significant, which makes it difficult to learn from one alloy system to predict properties of another. We argue that these problems can be reduced to some extent, however these challenges are common in complex materials science problems and constitute a fundamental challenge in applying supervised ML strategies in this context.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Corey S. O’Hern

    Yale University

    68 shared
  • Ze Liu

    Guangzhou Medical University

    57 shared
  • William L. Johnson

    University of New Mexico

    57 shared
  • Mark D. Shattuck

    55 shared
  • Yanhui Liu

    Peking University

    54 shared
  • André D. Taylor

    New York University

    53 shared
  • Sungwoo Sohn

    50 shared
  • Yanhui Liu

    Institute of Physics

    45 shared

Labs

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Jan Schroers

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup