Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Gary Cox:

Gary Cox:

· William Bennett Munro Professor of Political Science

Stanford University · Political Economy

Active 1975–2025

h-index69
Citations25.1k
Papers33124 last 5y
Funding

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Gary Cox: — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Gary W. Cox is the William Bennett Munro Professor of Political Science at Stanford University. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology, earned in 1983, and a B.S. in History from the same institution, completed in 1978. Cox has authored numerous articles in the areas of legislative and electoral politics and is the author of several influential books, including The Efficient Secret, which won the 1983 Samuel H Beer dissertation prize and the 2003 George H Hallett Award; Making Votes Count, recipient of the 1998 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award, the 1998 Luebbert Prize, and the 2007 George H Hallett Award; and Setting the Agenda, which received the 2006 Leon D. Epstein Book Award. He is also the co-author of Legislative Leviathan, which won the 1993 Richard F Fenno Prize, and Marketing Sovereign Promises, awarded the William Riker Prize in 2016. Cox is a former Guggenheim Fellow and was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1996 and the National Academy of Sciences in 2005. His research interests include American Politics, Comparative Politics, and Political Methodology.

Research topics

  • Political Science
  • Sociology
  • Law
  • Political economy
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Public economics
  • Microeconomics
  • Finance
  • Public relations

Selected publications

  • Seniority-Based Nominations and Political Careers

    American Political Science Review · 2020 · 132 citations

    This paper investigates party use of seniority systems to allocate nominations for elected and appointed offices. Such systems, which can regulate party members’ access to offices at multiple levels of their careers, are defined by two main rules or norms: an incumbent re-nomination norm and a seniority progression norm. Using comprehensive electoral and candidate data from Norwegian local and national elections from 1945 to 2019, we find systematic patterns consistent with these two norms. Our…

  • Nonunitary Parties, Government Formation, and Gamson’s Law

    American Political Science Review · 2021-04-26 · 37 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Following the coalition literature highlighting intraparty politics (e.g., Giannetti and Benoit 2009; Laver 1999; Strøm 2003), I address the well-known “portfolio allocation paradox” (Warwick and Druckman 2006) by introducing a new model of government formation based on two main assumptions. First, no actor has a structural advantage in the negotiations leading to government formation. Second, all actors who can deprive the coalition of a majority (or other critical threshold size) must be inclu…

  • Window of Opportunity: War and the Origins of Parliament

    British Journal of Political Science · 2023-05-17 · 24 citations

    articleOpen access1st author

    Abstract Two important puzzles characterize the development of pre-modern Eurasian polities. First, most rulers convened councils of nobles, but only European monarchs expanded them to create parliaments. Second, war was common throughout Eurasia, but only in Europe did it correlate with the formation of parliaments. We advance a new argument about the emergence of parliaments that accounts for both stylized facts while integrating the literature highlighting the rulers' need to finance wars wit…

  • Moral hazard in electoral teams: List rank and campaign effort

    Journal of Public Economics · 2021 · 24 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
  • The Political Economy of Suffrage Reform: The Great Reform Act of 1832

    Journal of Historical Political Economy · 2023-05-17 · 19 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    We argue that the Great Reform Act’s suffrage provisions were part of a broader effort to constrain the executive, thereby enabling an expansion in the state’s repressive capacity. When they came to power, the Whigs first increased parliament’s power over the purse; and then bolstered its independence from the monarch and allied patronal peers by reforming parliamentary elections. These reforms to constrain the executive were followed almost immediately by substantial investments in the state’s…

Frequent coauthors

  • Mathew D. McCubbins

    Duke University

    358 shared
  • Arend Lijphart

    167 shared
  • Jon H. Fiva

    BI Norwegian Business School

    165 shared
  • Alexandra Cirone

    152 shared
  • Chí Huang

    Government Communications Headquarters

    49 shared
  • Alexander C. Tan

    49 shared
  • Nathan Beaulieu Batto

    49 shared
  • Joseph Cooper

    29 shared

Education

  • Ph.D., Political Science

    Stanford University

    1983
  • B.A., Political Science

    University of California, Berkeley

    1977

Awards & honors

  • The Efficient Secret (winner of the 1983 Samuel H Beer disse…
  • The Efficient Secret (winner of the 2003 George H Hallett Aw…
  • Legislative Leviathan (winner of the 1993 Richard F Fenno Pr…
  • Making Votes Count (winner of the 1998 Woodrow Wilson Founda…
  • Making Votes Count (winner of the 1998 Luebbert Prize)

Similar researchers at Stanford University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Gary Cox:

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup