Erwin Chemerinsky
· Dean and Professor of LawUniversity of California, Berkeley · Law
Active 1979–2026
About
Erwin Chemerinsky is a faculty member at UC Berkeley Law, where he is involved in various academic and clinical programs. His work encompasses a broad range of legal issues, including civil rights, criminal justice, environmental law, and public interest law. Chemerinsky has contributed significantly to legal scholarship and education, focusing on social justice and public interest advocacy. He is known for his leadership in clinical programs such as the Death Penalty Clinic, Human Rights Clinic, and Policy Advocacy Clinic, which aim to promote human rights, criminal justice reform, and social equity. Chemerinsky's research and teaching emphasize the importance of legal advocacy in advancing social justice causes, and he has been actively involved in community outreach and legal projects that address issues like racial justice, immigrant rights, and environmental conservation.
Research topics
- Political Science
- Sociology
- Law
- Computer Science
- Criminology
- Programming language
- Philosophy
- Epistemology
- Virology
- Medicine
- Gender studies
- History
Selected publications
Yale University Press eBooks · 2026-02-02
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding5 Principles, Practices, Precautions
Yale University Press eBooks · 2026-02-02
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingPrologue: Knowing the Principles Isn’t Enough
Yale University Press eBooks · 2026-02-02
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingOxford University Press eBooks · 2025-09-23
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingAbstract This article explores the complex interplay between race and free speech in American history, highlighting how speech serves both as a catalyst for racial justice and a vehicle for racial harm. It traces the use of free speech in the abolitionist movement, where activists face Southern suppression and federal inaction but ultimately shift national discourse. The article examines how the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s uses speech, protest, and litigation to challenge racial segregation, culminating in landmark Supreme Court cases affirming expressive rights. It also discusses Latinx advocacy, focusing on language rights and anti-immigrant ordinances, and how courts address these challenges. Finally, the article assesses hate speech jurisprudence, underscoring that despite efforts to restrict racist expression, courts consistently protect such speech under the First Amendment unless it constitutes a true threat.
Michigan Law Review · 2025-01-01
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingA review of The Constitution of the War on Drugs. By David Pozen.
Justice Blackmun Got It Right in <i>Roe v. Wade</i>
2024-02-22
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingAbstract The premise of the Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is that Roe v. Wade was “egregiously wrong” and “exceedingly weak.” This essay says that Justice Harry Blackmun got it exactly right in addressing the three key questions: Are rights of privacy and autonomy protected even if not enumerated in the Constitution? Do laws prohibiting abortion infringe on privacy and autonomy? Does the state have a compelling interest in prohibiting abortions? A close reading of the Court’s opinion in Dobbs reveals that the Court agrees with Justice Blackmun on the first two issues, and it is only its judgment that states can regard the fetus as “potential life” that explains the overruling of Roe. But this decision is based on a religious judgment inappropriate for the Court to make.
Stanford University Press eBooks · 2024
- Political Science
- Political Science
The Future of Substantive Due Process: What Are the Stakes?
SMU Law Review · 2023-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingChapter 3 THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEM
Yale University Press eBooks · 2022-09-06
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingChapter 1 THE RISE OF ORIGINALISM
Yale University Press eBooks · 2022-09-06
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding
Frequent coauthors
- 97 shared
Catherine L. Fisk
University of Hawaii System
- 92 shared
Mario L. Barnes
University of Pittsburgh
- 82 shared
Seth Davis
University of Hawaii System
- 81 shared
Cheryl M. Harris
Tulane University
- 81 shared
Shirin Sinnar
University of California Hastings College of the Law
- 81 shared
Pooja Dadhania
Tulane University
- 81 shared
Kathryn Abrams
- 81 shared
Michael Churgin
Tulane University
Education
- 1977
B.A., Political Science
Yale University
- 1980
Other, Law
University of California, Berkeley
- 1974
M.A., Political Science
Yale University
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Erwin Chemerinsky
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup