
Erin Krupa
· Associate ProfessorVerifiedNorth Carolina State University · Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
Active 1971–2025
About
Erin Horne is the Assistant Dean for Professional Education and Accreditation at the College of Education at NC State University. Her role involves overseeing professional education programs and ensuring accreditation standards are met. She is part of the leadership team that supports the college's strategic initiatives in education, research, and community engagement. Her responsibilities include managing professional development, licensure, and accreditation processes within the college, contributing to the college's mission to prepare educators and educational leaders.
Research topics
- Sociology
- Computer Science
- Psychology
- Mathematics
- Epistemology
- Political Science
- Mathematics education
- Social Science
- Engineering
- Philosophy
- Management science
- Medicine
- Law
- Pedagogy
Selected publications
Interdisciplinary project based-inquiry: Empowering students to solve global problems
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · 2025-05-20 · 1 citations
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingThis study investigates the impact of an interdisciplinary project-based inquiry global project on 9<sup>th</sup> grade students’ science content knowledge and engagement using a mixed-methods research design. Data sources included pre/post tests on science content, pre/post survey on student motivation, and student focus groups interview data. Results indicate there were significant increases in student science content knowledge and significant increases in their feelings of empowerment. Three themes emerged from the focus group interviews: (1) collaborating during the pandemic, (2) motivation through sharing their ideas, and (3) motivation to learn science, technology, engineering, and mathematics content to solve global problems. Discussion focuses on the ways project-based learning help students feel motivated, even in a virtual learning environment.
Education Sciences · 2025-05-25 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessSolving many of the pressing issues facing the world today will require a deep and integrated understanding of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). To prepare today’s K-12 students to tackle these challenges, STEM education must create opportunities to learn disciplinary content while inventing actionable solutions to messy, interdisciplinary problems. Learning frameworks, such as Project-Based Learning (PBL), Design-Based Learning (DBL), and Entrepreneurial-Based Learning (EBL), could support this reconceptualization of STEM education. New approaches are needed that leverage and integrate what works from these frameworks to better prepare students for success post-schooling. This means leveraging frameworks that emphasize practices and ways of thinking that support students to build and justify solutions that create value for users, while also creating a need for disciplinary content knowledge. This is especially necessary for mathematics, a discipline that is often treated insufficiently in interdisciplinary STEM activities. This paper introduces the Design & Pitch (D&P) Challenges in STEM Learning Framework, a novel learning framework that leverages features of PBL, DBL, and EBL, situating math learning within entrepreneurial pitch competitions. It describes the D&P Learning Framework and explores how each contributing learning framework combines to enhance students’ work, focusing their mathematical reasoning, while also empowering them to invent relevant solutions to authentic problems.
The Journal of Educational Research · 2025-09-20
articleJournal of Mathematics Education · 2025-01-01
articleOpen accessThis study investigates how teachers facilitate small-group mathematical discourse during Design & Pitch (D&P) Challenges in STEM, an experiential framework combining entrepreneurial, project-based, and design-based learning. By examining teacher interactions, we explore how educators draw on their personal practical knowledge to support student thinking and navigate the unpredictable nature of student-generated ideas in these innovative learning environments. This exploratory study investigates how teachers drew on their personal practical knowledge during group check-ins, leveraging teacher discourse moves (TDMs) to facilitate student thinking and mathematics learning. We analyzed 14 video-recorded small-group check-ins, memoed for evidence of personal practical knowledge and coded using a priori TDMs drawn from the North Carolina Collaborative for Mathematics Learning (NC2ML) framework. A thematic analysis of the coded transcripts revealed patterns in how teachers facilitated discourse, leading to three emergent themes: positioning students as experts, co-designing with students, and pushing students toward an outcome. These findings provide insight into how discourse moves can be used to support small group discussions within an entrepreneurial design project, as well as the challenges that emerge for teachers when guiding students towards desired outcomes.
Analysing the authenticity of a U.S. statistics textbook
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025-06-17
articleInternational audience
2024-01-30
book-chapterIn this chapter, we describe the process that led to the development of a set of essential Student Learning Objectives (SLO) for undergraduate Geometry for Teachers courses. We briefly summarize each SLO, connect these SLOs to the AMTE Standards for Preparing Teachers of Mathematics (SPTM) and Mathematical Association of America’s Committee on the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics (CUPM) Curriculum Guide, and provide recommendations for implementation and future stewardship of the SLOs.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · 2024-11-25 · 2 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorSupporting Student Learning of Geometry Through Animated Worked Example Pairs
2024-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingDefining Test‐Score Interpretation, Use, and Claims: Delphi Study for the Validity Argument
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · 2023-06-27 · 8 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorAbstract Validity is a fundamental consideration of test development and test evaluation. The purpose of this study is to define and reify three key aspects of validity and validation, namely test‐score interpretation, test‐score use, and the claims supporting interpretation and use. This study employed a Delphi methodology to explore how experts in validity and validation conceptualize test‐score interpretation, use, and claims. Definitions were developed through multiple iterations of data collection and analysis. By clarifying the language used when conducting validation, validation may be more accessible to a broader audience, including but not limited to test developers, test users, and test consumers.
Project-Based Inquiry (PBI) Global during a Pandemic: A New Learning Ecology Perspective
Education Sciences · 2023-10-31 · 5 citations
articleOpen accessBuilding on new learning ecology theory and situated in the COVID-19 pandemic context, a qualitative research design was used to examine student and teacher perspectives on Project-Based Inquiry (PBI) Global. Drawing on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL), PBI Global supports participants toward engaging in inquiry-to-action aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Data sources for this study included transcripts from student and teacher focus groups conducted before, during, and after the PBI Global process. Three themes emerged (1) creating global awareness of water issues, (2) learning to collaborate in remote and hybrid contexts, and (3) enhancing self-efficacy through iterative learning. The discussion focuses on the affordances and challenges of engaging in PBL during non-voluntary online learning, as well as study limitations and directions for future research.
Recent grants
Collaborative Research: Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education (VM2ED)
NSF · $1.4M · 2019–2027
Supporting Students' Science Content Knowledge through Project-Based Inquiry
NSF · $449k · 2019–2022
Frequent coauthors
- 10 shared
Jonathan D. Bostic
Bowling Green State University
- 6 shared
Michele Carney
Boise State University
- 5 shared
Corey Webel
University of Missouri
- 5 shared
Jason McManus
- 5 shared
A.B. Khalikulov
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
- 5 shared
Mika Munakata
- 4 shared
Stephanie Casey
Eastern Michigan University
- 4 shared
Hiller A. Spires
North Carolina State University
Labs
Friday InstitutePI
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Erin Krupa
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup