Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Hannah Riley Bowles

Hannah Riley Bowles

Verified

Harvard University · Urban Policy and Planning

Active 2001–2024

h-index19
Citations2.9k
Papers9519 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Hannah Riley Bowles — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Social Science
  • Political Science
  • Sociology
  • Social psychology
  • Process management
  • Public relations
  • Business
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • How Do We Manage Difficult Conversations?

    Academy of Management Proceedings · 2024

    • Computer Science
    • Business
    • Computer Science

    Organizational members increasingly find themselves immersed in debates, frictions, disagreements, and uncertainties. Effective communication skills are thus crucial for individual and organizational success. Despite the importance of difficult conversations, however, effectively managing them remains an enduring challenge, and extant research suggests that people often choose the wrong conversation strategies and harm their own and others’ outcomes. This symposium presents novel research highlighting how people can manage difficult conversations. In particular, the papers presented (1) identify negotiation issues that employers should bring up to better motivate employees; explore conversation strategies that (2) facilitate creativity and (3) increase receptivity and open-mindedness; (4) document potential caveats of demonstrating good listening in difficult conversations; and (5) discuss why people use ineffective conversation strategies despite knowing their harmful effects. Taken together, this symposium highlights the fraught nature of interpersonal communication, and demonstrates strategies to improve the effective flow of information and improve both interpersonal and organizational outcomes. These papers underscore the importance of managing difficult conversations and inform practical implications for individuals and teams. Negotiating Role/Workload Enhances Employee Motivation More than Negotiating Pay Author: Einav Hart; George Mason U. Author: Hannah Riley Bowles; Harvard U. Sharing and Caring: Dynamics of Idea Sharing, Critique, and Collaboration in Teams Author: Christine Nguyen; Columbia U. Author: Daniel Ames; Columbia Business School Beyond Persuasion: Improving Conversational Quality Around High-Stakes Interpersonal Disagreements Author: Julia Alexandra Minson; Harvard Kennedy School Author: David Hagmann; - Author: Kara Luo; Stanford U. You Listened Because You Agree with Me – People Think Good Listeners Share Their Views More Author: Zhiying Ren; The Wharton School, U. of Pennsylvania Author: Rebecca Schaumberg; The Wharton School, U. of Pennsylvania The “I Told You So” Effect Author: Ovul Sezer; Cornell U. Author: Mary Ross; - Author: Salvatore J. Affinito; New York U. Author: Bradley R. Staats; U. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

  • Who Negotiates and When? Individual Differences and Context Effects in Negotiation

    Academy of Management Proceedings · 2021

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Sociology
    • Political Science
    • Social psychology

    Negotiation is a fundamental interpersonal tool and managerial skill, through which individuals and groups obtain some of their most consequential outcomes. Developing a deeper understanding of negotiation behavior involves understanding both the mechanics of negotiation – which strategies are effective and what negotiators expect – and the broader context in which the negotiation occurs. The papers in this symposium investigate individual differences and group-level differences in negotiators’ expectations, the negotiation process, and negotiators’ subsequent outcomes. We present novel research studies with field and experimental data and qualitative investigations that describe how negotiators’ individual characteristics (e.g., personality, gender, and minority status) and the negotiation context (e.g., importance of issues or relationships, stereotype congruence) impacts negotiators’ expectations, behavior, and outcomes. This set of research papers provides a broad perspective on how factors outside the negotiation table shape negotiators’ expectations, the negotiation process itself, and the consequences for negotiators’ expectations and their long-term, post-negotiation outcomes. Consistency, presence, and contagion in negotiator behavior across partners: A round-robin study Presenter: Hillary Anger Elfenbein; Washington U. in St. Louis Presenter: Jared R. Curhan; MIT Sloan School of Management Presenter: Noah Eisenkraft; U. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Negotiation as a Tool for Perseverance in Counterstereotypical Careers Presenter: Hannah Riley Bowles; Harvard U. Presenter: Deborah Wu; U. of Massachusetts, Amherst Presenter: Bobbi Thomason; Pepperdine Graziadio Business School Presenter: Nilajana Dasgupta; U. of Massachusetts, Amherst When Bargainers Disclose Their Priorities: The Expectations and Reality of Information Sharing Presenter: Daniel Ames; Columbia Business School Relational Concerns and the Economic Value of Negotiated Agreements Presenter: Einav Hart; George Mason U.

Frequent coauthors

  • Bobbi Thomason

    Pepperdine University

    25 shared
  • May Al Dabbagh

    22 shared
  • Linda Babcock

    Decision Sciences (United States)

    21 shared
  • Kathleen L. McGinn

    Harvard University Press

    16 shared
  • Lei Lai

    7 shared
  • Rochelle P. Walensky

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    6 shared
  • Helen Christou

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    6 shared
  • Julia B. Bear

    Stony Brook University

    5 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Hannah Riley Bowles

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup