Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Earl Bellinger

Earl Bellinger

· Assistant Professor

Yale University · Department of Astronomy

Active 2011–2024

h-index25
Citations2.0k
Papers14990 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Earl Bellinger — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Earl Bellinger is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Astronomy at Yale University, with a secondary appointment in the Foundations of Data Science Institute. He leads the Yale AstroML (YAML) research group, which focuses on utilizing big data and artificial intelligence to address various problems in astronomy and astrophysics. His research primarily aims to advance understanding of the structure and formation of the Milky Way and its satellite galaxies through the study of pulsating stars. Additionally, he employs stellar pulsation data to explore issues related to stellar evolution, fundamental physics, and beyond-standard-model physics.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Physics
  • Astrophysics
  • Optics
  • Computational physics
  • Nuclear engineering
  • Mechanics

Selected publications

  • Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2023 · 517 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Physics
    • Astrophysics

    Abstract We update the capabilities of the open-knowledge software instrument Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics ( MESA ). The new auto _ diff module implements automatic differentiation in MESA , an enabling capability that alleviates the need for hard-coded analytic expressions or finite-difference approximations. We significantly enhance the treatment of the growth and decay of convection in MESA with a new model for time-dependent convection, which is particularly important during late-stage nuclear burning in massive stars and electron-degenerate ignition events. We strengthen MESA ’s implementation of the equation of state, and we quantify continued improvements to energy accounting and solver accuracy through a discussion of different energy equation features and enhancements. To improve the modeling of stars in MESA , we describe key updates to the treatment of stellar atmospheres, molecular opacities, Compton opacities, conductive opacities, element diffusion coefficients, and nuclear reaction rates. We introduce treatments of starspots, an important consideration for low-mass stars, and modifications for superadiabatic convection in radiation-dominated regions. We describe new approaches for increasing the efficiency of calculating monochromatic opacities and radiative levitation, and for increasing the efficiency of evolving the late stages of massive stars with a new operator-split nuclear burning mode. We close by discussing major updates to MESA ’s software infrastructure that enhance source code development and community engagement.

  • The Aarhus red giants challenge

    Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · 52 citations

    • Physics
    • Astrophysics

    Context. With the advent of space-based asteroseismology, determining accurate properties of red-giant stars using their observed oscillations has become the focus of many investigations due to their implications in a variety of fields in astrophysics. Stellar models are fundamental in predicting quantities such as stellar age, and their reliability critically depends on the numerical implementation of the physics at play in this evolutionary phase. Aims. We introduce the Aarhus red giants challenge, a series of detailed comparisons between widely used stellar evolution and oscillation codes that aim to establish the minimum level of uncertainties in properties of red giants arising solely from numerical implementations. We present the first set of results focusing on stellar evolution tracks and structures in the red-giant-branch (RGB) phase. Methods. Using nine state-of-the-art stellar evolution codes, we defined a set of input physics and physical constants for our calculations and calibrated the convective efficiency to a specific point on the main sequence. We produced evolutionary tracks and stellar structure models at a fixed radius along the red-giant branch for masses of 1.0 M ⊙ , 1.5 M ⊙ , 2.0 M ⊙ , and 2.5 M ⊙ , and compared the predicted stellar properties. Results. Once models have been calibrated on the main sequence, we find a residual spread in the predicted effective temperatures across all codes of ∼20 K at solar radius and ∼30–40 K in the RGB regardless of the considered stellar mass. The predicted ages show variations of 2–5% (increasing with stellar mass), which we attribute to differences in the numerical implementation of energy generation. The luminosity of the RGB-bump shows a spread of about 10% for the considered codes, which translates into magnitude differences of ∼0.1 mag in the optical V -band. We also compare the predicted [C/N] abundance ratio and find a spread of 0.1 dex or more for all considered masses. Conclusions. Our comparisons show that differences at the level of a few percent still remain in evolutionary calculations of red giants branch stars despite the use of the same input physics. These are mostly due to differences in the energy generation routines and interpolation across opacities, and they call for further investigation on these matters in the context of using properties of red giants as benchmarks for astrophysical studies.

Frequent coauthors

  • S. Hekker

    111 shared
  • Y. Lebreton

    73 shared
  • R. M. Ouazzani

    63 shared
  • George C. Angelou

    Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

    57 shared
  • Sarbani Basu

    51 shared
  • Warrick H. Ball

    University of Birmingham

    46 shared
  • S. E. de Mink

    35 shared
  • Dennis Stello

    UNSW Sydney

    34 shared

Education

  • Ph.D.

    Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research

    2018
  • M.Sc. Computer Science, School of Informatics and Computing

    Indiana University

    2014
  • B.Sc. Computer Science, B.Sc. Applied Mathematics

    SUNY Oswego

    2012

Awards & honors

  • Hoffleit Scholarship
  • Dorrit Hoffleit Scholars
  • Yale F&ES Graduate Student Award
  • Brouwer Prize Recipients
  • Yale Time Allocation Committee

Similar researchers at Yale University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Earl Bellinger

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup