
James Freihaut
· ProfessorPennsylvania State University · Architectural Engineering
Active 1977–2025
About
James Freihaut is a Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at Penn State University. His research areas include building mechanical systems with a focus on indoor air quality and building science, combined heat and power systems, distributed energy systems, and enclosed space air quality issues. His expertise encompasses system constraints on air treatment and filtration solutions, contributing to the development of high-performing and sustainable building environments. Freihaut holds a Master of Science in Physical Chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic University (1972) and a Ph.D. in Fuel Science from Penn State University (1980). His work has significantly advanced understanding in areas such as aerosol science, indoor particle resuspension, energy performance of HVAC systems, and ultraviolet inactivation of airborne microorganisms. He has contributed to the field through numerous publications, including journal articles, conference proceedings, and manuscripts, emphasizing the scientific and engineering aspects of planning, designing, and constructing buildings. His research supports Penn State's mission to lead in innovative education and research aimed at achieving high-performing built environments.
Research topics
- Computer Science
- Engineering
- Computer Security
- Automotive engineering
- Data Mining
- Artificial Intelligence
- Algorithm
- Reliability engineering
- Real-time computing
- Telecommunications
- Computer network
- Electrical engineering
Selected publications
Energy Conversion and Management · 2025-04-02 · 10 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorEnergy Reports · 2025-12-13
articleOpen accessSenior authorAs the urgency to address climate change and modernize energy infrastructure grows, the building sector plays a key role in improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. This study evaluates five energy retrofit strategies for Building 101 at The Navy Yard in Philadelphia, comparing two real-world proposals from energy service companies with three simulation-based packages derived from Building Energy Simulation (BES) tools. The study examined whether advanced BES tools provide greater accuracy and decision-making value compared to simpler alternatives. Electricity savings ranged from 5 % to 40 %, gas savings from 29.7 % to 61 %, and annual cost reductions between $22,495 and $55,383. The most effective package achieved a 40 % reduction in energy use, with a simple payback of 2.8 years, demonstrating strong economic and environmental viability. By directly comparing retrofit outcomes across five independently developed scenarios, each using distinct software, data inputs, and calibration protocols, this study uniquely captures the fragmented reality of energy modeling practice and provides a scalable framework for cross-tool benchmarking. Advanced BES tools produced more detailed outputs but require significant expertise and data, while simpler platforms like Asset Score produced comparable results with lower input demands, making them suitable for early-stage or resource-constrained assessments. The study’s direct comparison across divergent baselines reveals how tool selection influences both technical outcomes and retrofit feasibility. Future research should prioritize AI-driven calibration, digital twins, and adaptive modeling to enhance accuracy, reduce complexity, and support scalable, stakeholder-responsive retrofit planning. • Evaluated 5 EEM packages for Building 101's energy retrofit. • Compared real-world data with simulation outputs from multiple BES tools. • Showcased Asset Score's viability against more complex BES tools. • Highlighted economic impacts of energy retrofitting on projected savings. • Identified need for AI-driven tools in future BES research.
2024-07-31
reportOpen accessSenior authorThe Department of Energy’s Mid Atlantic Combined Heat and Power Technical Assistance Partnership (MA CHP TAP) was established to develop public-private partnerships to advance the technology, policies, and programmatic support for combined heat and power (CHP), including its application in microgrids, heat to power and district energy. The MA CHP TAP’s work includes education and outreach as well as technical assistance to a variety of stakeholders including end-users (commercial, industrial, institutional and more), state decision makers, electric and gas utilities, trade associations and non-profit organizations. This assistance includes evaluating the economic, energy, reliability and environmental value of proposed systems. The MA CHP TAP represents the multi-state Mid- Atlantic region and is the CHP expert in the region who provides fact-based, un-biased information on CHP, including technologies, project development, project financing, local electric and natural gas utility interfaces, and related state best practice policies.
SSRN Electronic Journal · 2024-01-01
preprintOpen accessSenior authorSSRN Electronic Journal · 2024-01-01
preprintOpen accessSenior authorBuildings · 2024-06-20 · 6 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorIn response to escalating energy demands and global warming concerns, the Passive House Standard has emerged as a solution in residential construction, aiming to drastically reduce energy consumption and operational costs primarily through high-performance building envelopes. While a considerable volume of the literature has focused on the Passivhaus Institute (PHI) standards, predominantly in European contexts, there is a gap in research on the Passive House Institute US (Phius) standards, particularly in North American climates. This study conducts a quantitative comparative analysis of two adjacent multifamily residential buildings in Central Pennsylvania, Climate Zone 5A—one built using conventional construction methods and the other following Passive House (PHIUS+ 2015) certification standards—to validate the energy efficiency improvements attributed to Passive House designs. A comparative analysis of the whole building energy use over two years reveals that the Passive House building consumes approximately 50% less energy than its conventional counterpart in terms of whole building energy use and the national median recommended benchmark metric defined by the Energy Star Portfolio Manager. These findings emphasize the potential for significant energy savings and greenhouse gas reductions in residential buildings, highlighting the necessity for policymakers and governments to incentivize the adoption of Passive House standards to achieve environmental sustainability and reduce energy costs for society.
Inactivation of HCoV-NL63 and SARS-CoV-2 in aqueous solution by 254 nm UV-C
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology · 2023-07-05 · 5 citations
articleCorresponding2023-07-26
articleSenior authorJournal of Building Engineering · 2023-09-14 · 20 citations
articleSSRN Electronic Journal · 2023-01-01
articleOpen access
Frequent coauthors
- 33 shared
William P. Bahnfleth
- 18 shared
Brandolyn H. Thran
United States Army
- 17 shared
D.J. Seery
- 11 shared
Jae‐Weon Jeong
Hanyang University
- 11 shared
W.M. Proscia
- 10 shared
Donghyun Rim
Pennsylvania State University
- 9 shared
Justin Bem
- 7 shared
Steven L. Suib
University of Connecticut
Labs
Architectural Engineering LabPI
Awards & honors
- Outstanding Engineering Alumni Award
- ASAE Early Career Impact Award
- Penn State Engineering Alumni Society Awards
- Penn State Alumni Association Awards
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with James Freihaut
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup