
David Strang
· ProfessorCornell University · Sociology
Active 1923–2023
About
David Strang is a professor in the Department of Sociology at Cornell University, with a research focus on innovation and diffusion in the political, organizational, and scientific worlds. His recent projects include studying the evolution of research articles over time, analyzing the impact of social movements on Congressional voting, and developing computational models of the adoption and abandonment of management practices. Ongoing work also examines obituaries in the New York Times to understand what achievements are publicly celebrated. His research interests encompass political sociology, social movements, organizations, economic sociology, and models and methods for dynamic processes. Strang has contributed to the understanding of the sociology of science, management ideas, and the diffusion of innovations across organizations and cultures.
Research topics
- Political science
- Business
- Computer science
- Sociology
- Psychology
Selected publications
Technical Note: The Effectiveness of the Transformation for T-Chart Data
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023-11-14
reportOpen access1st authorCorrespondingAs part of environmental health surveillance, healthcare surveillance, and public health surveillance there is a need to track rare events. Where these data follow a Poisson distribution, such as surveillance of infectious diseases or incidents involving inhalation of elemental mercury vapour (e.g. a damaged sphygmomanometer), various statistical methods have been developed. One option is the T-Chart, which allows the user to track a single variable of interest over time, then look for non-random variation referred to as ‘special cause’. This was first developed by Nelson in 1994 and is a sub-type of statistical process control charts.Nelson noted that “the times between occurrences of Poisson-distributed events are independent and exponentially distributed” and therefore highly positively skewed. Nelson therefore proposed a power transformation to overcome this to form a Weibull distribution. However, the effectiveness of this transformation on real world data is unknown, therefore the purpose of this study is to identify real world data from the published literature and quantify its effectiveness.This study observed that T-Charts are not common in the published literature, that researchers could report the skewness and kurtosis of data to help understand whether conventional ‘special cause’ rules will be appropriate, and that Normality is not achieved in all cases using Nelson’s power transformation. The recommendation of using 0.5 in place of zero appears to improve the effectiveness of the transformation, however, few sample were available.
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023-07-22
reportOpen access1st authorCorresponding18. Institutionalizing Family-Friendly Policies
Cornell University Press eBooks · 2019-03-14 · 3 citations
book-chapterSenior author2019-01-01
articleSenior author2019-03-27 · 1 citations
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingAbstract This chapter extends research on peer review by utilizing and assessing an emerging methodology: automated textual analysis. In a corpus of 38 papers successfully revised for publication in Administrative Science Quarterly, the authors found that measures based on exact wording (measured by plagiarism detection) and sentence similarity (measured by Word Mover’s Distance) performed well in capturing differences between original submissions and published papers. They identified the same overall pattern of revision that authors reported (intensive revision of Theory and Discussion sections, limited modification of Methods), and were strongly correlated with the turnover in references and hypotheses that occurred in the course of peer review. Automated textual analysis can usefully contribute to the study of manuscript change in peer review and other social scientific contexts, particularly as available textual corpora grow in size.
Methods for the Study of Management Ideas
2019-03-28 · 10 citations
reference-entryOpen access1st authorCorrespondingThis chapter surveys methodologies employed in the study of management ideas. It emphasizes the field’s rich variety of data collection, measurement, and inferential strategies. To map this landscape, the authors group studies by the number of cases they examine, from large N event history analyses based on archival data to ethnographies of a single organization. They give particular attention to bibliometrics and discourse analysis because these methods grapple with the interpretive and communicative processes that are central to management ideas and because techniques for capturing and analysing text are currently being revolutionized across the social sciences.
New Directions for Research on Management Ideas
2019-03-28 · 1 citations
reference-entrySenior authorThis short chapter draws together selected insights and views from the various contributions to the handbook in order to consider avenues for further research into management ideas. In particular, the need to make diverse empirical, theoretical, disciplinary, methodological, and conceptual linkages is outlined. Also, emergent themes are identified which include the familiar and important concerns with identifying the impact of management ideas. In addition, debates on possible academic engagement with practitioners in the field along with calls to extend beyond conventional contexts and approaches are discussed. The conclusion reflects briefly on the possibility for extending the reach of studies related to management ideas.
Researching management ideas : an introduction
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2019-03-01 · 1 citations
articleSenior authorThis chapter introduces the research field of management ideas by identifying different approaches and literatures and discussing some of the reasons why it has expanded in recent years. The fragmentation of the field is outlined and linked to a diversity in terminology, theoretical perspectives and empirical objects. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the structure of the handbook and summaries of each of the individual contributions.
Social Studies of Science · 2017-03-21 · 17 citations
article1st authorCorrespondingThis paper analyzes the surface structure of research articles published in Administrative Science Quarterly between 1956 and 2008. The period is marked by a shift from essays that interweave theory, methods and results to experimental reports that separate them. There is dramatic growth in the size of theory, methods and discussion sections, accompanied by a shrinking results section. Bibliographic references and hypotheses expand in number and become concentrated in theory sections. Article structure varies primarily with historical time and also with research design (broadly, quantitative vs. qualitative) and the author's background. We link trends in article structure to the disciplinary development of organization studies and consider its distinctive trajectory relative to physical science.
Interorganizational Institutions
2017-08-11 · 41 citations
other1st authorCorresponding
Frequent coauthors
- 85 shared
Beth V. Yarbrough
- 85 shared
Peter F. Cowhey
University of California, San Diego
- 85 shared
Janice Gross Stein
University of Toronto
- 85 shared
Mark W. Zacher
- 85 shared
John Gerard Ruggie
- 85 shared
Oran R. Young
- 85 shared
Charles Lake
GTx (United States)
- 85 shared
Duncan Snidal
University of Oxford
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with David Strang
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup