Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Colin Phillips

Colin Phillips

· Distinguished Scholar-Teacher

University of Maryland, College Park · Linguistics

Active 1978–2025

h-index49
Citations10.6k
Papers25037 last 5y
Funding$6.7M

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Colin Phillips — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Colin Phillips is a Professor and Distinguished Scholar-Teacher in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Maryland. He is a member of the Maryland Language Science Center. His research expertise includes language acquisition, neurolinguistics, and psycholinguistics. Phillips's work focuses on understanding the mechanisms underlying language processing and production, with particular attention to syntactic constraints, sentence planning, and the relationship between parsing and generation. His research investigates how syntactic categories influence lexical access during speech, the grammatical distinctions affecting sentence production, and the cognitive processes involved in language comprehension and memory. He has contributed to advancing theories on how linguistic knowledge is systematically assembled in real-time language use, and how language processing relates to language acquisition, including developmental aspects in children and adult learners.

Research topics

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Mathematics
  • Speech recognition

Selected publications

  • Syntactic category constrains lexical competition in speaking

    Cognition · 2020 · 16 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
  • Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words

    Neurobiology of Language · 2022 · 14 citations

    Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as compared to continuous speech. This suggests a less unified and automatic word recognition process than is often assumed. We present evidence from isolated words that neural effects of phoneme probabi…

  • Why non-native speakers sometimes outperform native speakers in agreement processing

    Bilingualism Language and Cognition · 2022-06-24 · 12 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Abstract It is well-known that native English speakers sometimes erroneously accept subject-verb agreement violations when there is a number-matching attractor (e.g., *The key to the cabinets were…). Whether bilinguals whose L1 lacks number agreement are prone to such interference is unclear, given previous studies that report conflicting findings using different structures, participant groups, and experimental designs. To resolve the conflict, we examined highly proficient Korean–English biling…

  • Agreement attraction error and timing profiles in continuous speech

    Glossa Psycholinguistics · 2022 · 11 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Studies of agreement attraction in language production have shown that speakers systematically produce verb agreement errors in the presence of a local noun whose features differ from that of the agreement controller. However, in attraction experiments, these errors only ever occur in a subset of trials. In the present study, we applied a naturalistic scene-description paradigm to investigate how attraction affects the distribution of errors and the time-course of correctly inflected verbs. We c…

  • Theories All the Way Down

    Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2021-12-09 · 7 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    It is common in linguistics to contrast "theoretical" and "experimental" research. Researchers who pursue experimental research are often asked about the theoretical consequences of their work. Such questions generally equate "theoretical" with theories at a specific high level of abstraction, guided by the questions of traditional linguistic theory. These theories focus on the structural representation of sentences in terms of discrete units, without regard to order, time, finer-grained memory…

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Nigel Fabb

    University of Strathclyde

    681 shared
  • Caroline Heycock

    681 shared
  • Andrew Simpson

    Durham University

    680 shared
  • Malka Rappaport Hovav

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    680 shared
  • Andrew Spencer

    University of Essex

    680 shared
  • Ruth Horn

    Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities

    680 shared
  • Robert D. Borsley

    Bangor University

    680 shared
  • James Blevins Cambridge

    Tianjin Normal University

    680 shared

Labs

Education

  • Ph.D, Linguistics

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    1996
  • BA, Modern Languages

    University of Oxford

    1990

Similar researchers at University of Maryland, College Park

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Colin Phillips

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup