
Noah Goodman
VerifiedStanford University · Symbolic Systems
Active 1961–2024
Research topics
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Political Science
- Psychology
- Cognitive science
- Management science
- Engineering ethics
- Law
- Engineering
- Data science
- Cognitive psychology
Selected publications
From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of coordination and convention.
Psychological Review · 2022 · 65 citations
Senior authorCorresponding- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Science
over multiple timescales. Partner-specific common ground quickly emerges from social inferences within dyadic interactions, while community-wide social conventions are stable priors that have been abstracted away from interactions with multiple partners. We present new empirical data alongside simulations showing how our model provides a computational foundation for several phenomena that have posed a challenge for previous accounts: (a) the convergence to more efficient referring expressions across repeated interaction with the same partner, (b) the gradual transfer of partner-specific common ground to strangers, and (c) the influence of communicative context on which conventions eventually form. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
arXiv (Cornell University) · 2021 · 2169 citations
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Science
AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models, ranging from their capabilities (e.g., language, vision, robotics, reasoning, human interaction) and technical principles(e.g., model architectures, training procedures, data, systems, security, evaluation, theory) to their applications (e.g., law, healthcare, education) and societal impact (e.g., inequity, misuse, economic and environmental impact, legal and ethical considerations). Though foundation models are based on standard deep learning and transfer learning, their scale results in new emergent capabilities,and their effectiveness across so many tasks incentivizes homogenization. Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution, as the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all the adapted models downstream. Despite the impending widespread deployment of foundation models, we currently lack a clear understanding of how they work, when they fail, and what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration commensurate with their fundamentally sociotechnical nature.
Frequent coauthors
- 114 shared
Joshua B. Tenenbaum
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- 54 shared
Robert D. Hawkins
- 51 shared
Tobias Gerstenberg
- 40 shared
David A. Lagnado
- 30 shared
Mike Wu
Sydney Local Health District
- 29 shared
Michael C. Frank
Stanford University
- 27 shared
Matthew Peterson
Naval Health Research Center
- 27 shared
Christopher Potts
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Noah Goodman
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup