James Bushnell
· ProfessorVerifiedUniversity of California, Davis · Business Economics
Active 1990–2025
About
James Bushnell is a professor in the Department of Economics at the University of California, Davis, and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. He holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California, Berkeley, along with a Master's degree in Operations Research from Berkeley and a Bachelor's degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Prior to joining UC Davis, he spent 15 years as the Research Director of the University of California Energy Institute in Berkeley and two years as the Cargill Chair in Energy Economics at Iowa State University. Professor Bushnell has long been actively involved in energy and environmental policy. Since 2002, he has served as a member of the Market Surveillance Committee of the California Independent System Operator and has advised the California Air Resources Board on emissions trading and climate policies. His research focuses on energy and environmental economics, industrial organization, regulation, and energy policy. He teaches courses in intermediate microeconomics, energy economics, and graduate industrial organization.
Research topics
- Economics
- Natural resource economics
- Engineering
- Environmental economics
- Business
- Environmental science
- Microeconomics
- Physics
- Electrical engineering
- Transport engineering
- Econometrics
Selected publications
Modeling Uncertainty in Climate Policy: An Application to the US Inflation Reduction Act
Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy · 2025-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingIn recent years, the analysis of US climate policy on the electricity sector has predominantly deployed electricity planning or capacity expansion models that use deterministic or equilibrium optimization methods. Although uncertainty in key input assumptions is considered, it is usually restricted to scenario analysis. In this study, we combine time-series econometric forecasting methods with an equilibrium electricity system-expansion model. The goal is to produce statistically rigorous distributions of outcomes rather than rely upon individually selected scenarios. We apply these techniques to the case of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in the context of the western US electricity grid. The most significant power sector financial incentives are tax credits applied to eligible zero-carbon and storage resources. Our results indicate that the impact of the IRA, in terms of additional investment in low-carbon resources, depends heavily on the realization of key exogenous variables. However, the net effect of the IRA is to sharply narrow the range of future carbon emissions, largely by eliminating states of the world where investment in natural gas resources would otherwise be optimal.
WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · 2025-05-01
book-chapterModeling Uncertainty in Climate Policy: An Application to the US IRA
SSRN Electronic Journal · 2024-01-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingElectric vehicle managed charging experiment
AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · 2024-07-11
datasetModeling Uncertainty in Climate Policy: An Application to the US IRA
National Bureau of Economic Research · 2024-08-01 · 1 citations
reportOpen access1st authorCorrespondingIn recent years the analysis of US climate policy on the electricity sector has predominantly deployed electricity planning or capacity expansion models that use deterministic or equilibrium optimization methods.While uncertainty in key input assumptions is considered, it is usually restricted to scenario analysis.In this study we combine time-series econometric forecasting methods with an equilibrium electricity system-expansion model.The goal is to produce statistically rigorous distributions of outcomes, rather than rely upon individually selected scenarios.We apply these techniques to the case of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in the context of the western US electricity grid.The most significant power sector financial incentives are tax credits applied to eligible zero-carbon and storage resources.Our results indicate that the impact of the IRA, in terms of additional investment in low-carbon resources, depends heavily on the realization of key exogenous variables.However, the net effect of the IRA is to sharply narrow the range of future carbon emissions, largely by eliminating states of the world where investment in natural gas resources would otherwise be optimal.
The Limits and Costs of Full Electrification
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · 2024-01-01 · 5 citations
articleSenior authorCorrespondingElectrification is a centerpiece of global decarbonization efforts. Yet there are reasons to be skeptical of the inevitability, or at least the optimal pace, of the transition. We discuss several underappreciated costs of full, or even deep, electrification. Consumer preferences can operate in favor of and in opposition to electrification goals, and electrification is likely to encounter physical and economic obstacles when it reaches some as-yet-unknown level. Although we readily acknowledge the external benefits of decarbonization, we also explore several underappreciated external costs. The credibility and eventual success of decarbonization efforts will be enhanced by foreseeing and ideally avoiding predictable but nonobvious costs of promising abatement pathways. Thus, even with all of its promise, the degree of electrification may ultimately reach a limit.
Electric vehicle managed charging experiment
AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · 2024-07-11
datasetThe End of Neutrality? Fuel Standards, Technology Neutrality, and Stimulating the EV Market
Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy · 2024-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingThe role of modal substitution in rebound effects within US freight transportation
Nature Energy · 2024-07-18 · 3 citations
article1st authorCorrespondingMarkets with Power: Competitive benchmark model of the Australian National Electricity Market
2023-06-06
article1st authorCorrespondingIn the late 2010s, a confluence of events contributed to unprecedented price increases and volatility in the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM). We investigate to what extent market power contributed to elevated prices during this time. We base our analysis on a benchmark model of the NEM, which estimates counterfactual prices under the assumption of perfect competition. We construct marginal cost curves for each interval based on unit characteristics and fuel prices and produce a counterfactual competitive timeseries using actual demand. A comparison of actual market outcomes with our benchmark simulations suggests that, on average, a material fraction of regional prices are a result of market power. Depending on the region and time period, market power can account for 10% to 50% of wholesale prices. Moreover, our analysis indicates that market power tends to be most prevalent within the Queensland region and during high levels of regional demand across the NEM.
Frequent coauthors
- 49 shared
Severin Borenstein
- 47 shared
Catherine Wolfram
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- 25 shared
Frank A. Wolak
National Bureau of Economic Research
- 19 shared
Carla Peterman
- 16 shared
Erin T. Mansur
National Bureau of Economic Research
- 15 shared
David Rapson
- 12 shared
Jonathan E. Hughes
World Conservation Monitoring Centre
- 9 shared
Christopher R. Knittel
National Bureau of Economic Research
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with James Bushnell
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup