Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Review faculty evidence in public, then use the workspace to turn your background into a shortlist, outreach, and meeting prep.

Profile-awarePaper evidenceSix agents
Anita Williams Woolley

Anita Williams Woolley

· Professor of Organizational Behavior and Theory

Carnegie Mellon University · Economics

Active 1998–2026

h-index30
Citations7.6k
Papers11952 last 5y
Funding$355k

Academic metrics are sourced from OpenAlex and public funding records; values may differ from Google Scholar.

See your match with Anita Williams Woolley — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Anita Williams Woolley is a Professor of Organizational Behavior and Theory at the Tepper School of Business. Her work is centered on research related to organizational behavior, leadership, and teamwork. She is involved in the academic community at Carnegie Mellon University, contributing to the faculty profile and engaging in research activities that explore how artificial intelligence and machine learning intersect with business, management science, and organizational behavior. Woolley's expertise and research focus on understanding the dynamics of organizations and the impact of technological advancements on business practices.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Psychology
  • Knowledge management
  • Social psychology
  • Computer Security
  • Political Science
  • Sociology
  • Microeconomics
  • Management

Selected publications

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research

    Academy of Management Annals · 2020 · 2102 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes a new generation of technologies capable of interacting with the environment and aiming to simulate human intelligence. The success of integrating AI into organizations critically depends on workers’ trust in AI technology. This review explains how AI differs from other technologies and presents the existing empirical research on the determinants of human “trust” in AI, conducted in multiple disciplines over the last 20 years. Based on the reviewed lite…

  • Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021 · 163 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding

    Collective intelligence (CI) is critical to solving many scientific, business, and other problems, but groups often fail to achieve it. Here, we analyze data on group performance from 22 studies, including 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups. Our results support the conclusion that a robust CI factor characterizes a group's ability to work together across a diverse set of tasks. We further show that CI is predicted by the proportion of women in the group, mediated by average social perceptiveness…

  • How large language models can reshape collective intelligence

    Nature Human Behaviour · 2024-09-20 · 84 citations

    review
  • Speaking out of turn: How video conferencing reduces vocal synchrony and collective intelligence

    PLoS ONE · 2021 · 79 citations

    Collective intelligence (CI) is the ability of a group to solve a wide range of problems. Synchrony in nonverbal cues is critically important to the development of CI; however, extant findings are mostly based on studies conducted face-to-face. Given how much collaboration takes place via the internet, does nonverbal synchrony still matter and can it be achieved when collaborators are physically separated? Here, we hypothesize and test the effect of nonverbal synchrony on CI that develops throug…

  • Collective Attention and Collective Intelligence: The Role of Hierarchy and Team Gender Composition

    Organization Science · 2022 · 30 citations

    1st authorCorresponding

    Collective intelligence (CI) captures a team’s ability to work together across a wide range of tasks and can vary significantly between teams. Extant work demonstrates that the level of collective attention a team develops has an important influence on its level of CI. An important question, then, is what enhances collective attention? Prior work demonstrates an association with team composition; here, we additionally examine the influence of team hierarchy and its interaction with team gender c…

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Christopher F. Chabris

    111 shared
  • J. Richard Hackman

    Harvard Global Health Institute

    104 shared
  • Stephen M. Kosslyn

    102 shared
  • Sean L. Bennett

    Carnegie Mellon University

    101 shared
  • Margaret E. Gerbasi

    Sage Therapeutics (United States)

    101 shared
  • Jonathon P. Schuldt

    Cornell University

    101 shared
  • Thomas E. Jerde

    Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute

    101 shared
  • Jonathan Wai

    Arkansas Department of Education

    100 shared

Education

  • Ph.D., Management Science

    Carnegie Mellon University

    2003
  • M.S., Management Science

    Carnegie Mellon University

    1999
  • B.S., Operations Research and Industrial Engineering

    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    1995

Similar researchers at Carnegie Mellon University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Anita Williams Woolley

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup