
Shelley Goldman
· ProfessorVerifiedStanford University · Social and Cultural Analysis in Education
Active 1963–2025
About
Professor Shelley Goldman is an educational anthropologist interested in the idea that learning takes place when students are actively engaged with each other, their teachers, and others in conversations, activities, content, and technologies. She is very interested in the power of real-world contexts to drive learning, and researches how people learn in and out of school. Goldman’s work focuses on creating opportunities for rich STEM learning, and for understanding how design thinking and technologies can create access and be transformational. Her current work includes broadening participation in STEM via family activities, design-based engagements, and through empathy work with scientists doing outreach.
Research topics
- Psychology
- Computer Science
- Sociology
- Internal medicine
- Medicine
- Physical therapy
- Medical emergency
- Mathematics education
- Pedagogy
Selected publications
Building Bridges with Families for Equitable Learning and Schooling
2025-06-18
book-chapterThe argument is made for meaningful and impactful positive relationships to emerge among parents and educators at all levels of the schooling system. COVID placed many social, economic, and health pressures on families who unexpectedly also were asked to become teachers on the home front. This chapter reviews the ways that parents, depicted throughout the book, showed ingenuity, commitment, and collaboration with their children and teachers to keep children learning. Many of the adaptive strategies and experiences of parents are highlighted. Implications for the future of schooling are suggested: (1) inviting and supporting parents as partners in designs for school learning; (2) creating online systems for education with ubiquitous and equitable access; and (3) engaging school systems in serious repair work with parents through collaborations that design responsive and inclusive system reforms. The future demands an education system forged by resilient schooling networks that mitigate inequalities through research-practice partnerships, sustained parent collaborations, and lasting bonds with non-school educating organizations.
2025-06-18
book-chapterFive years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the global community continues to reflect on its educational impact, the inequities it exposed, and the need for strategies to build more resilient systems. Families, COVID, and Unequal Schooling in the US contributes to this reflective and forward-looking work by examining the central roles families played in maintaining academic learning and emotional well-being during school closures. This chapter introduces a collection of research-based family and community studies conducted during the early and middle phases of the COVID-19 quarantine. Grounded in contemporary insights from the science of learning and development and informed by an emerging transdisciplinary understanding of system resilience, these studies reveal the adaptive strategies families and communities employed to navigate remote learning. By highlighting the need for dynamic and equitable infrastructures, this volume lays the foundation for exploring how educational systems can be better designed for continual revitalization, expansion, and repair when families and communities are centered as collaborators.
Families, COVID, and Unequal Schooling in the US
2025-06-18
book1st authorCorrespondingAdministrator Work and Parent Responses During COVID School Closures
2025-06-18
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingThis case study of one K-8 school district examines administrator work to establish an eventual safe return to in-person schooling during the COVID pandemic and parents’ responses, interactions, and interpretations concerning the processes. The study is largely based on open-ended interviews with a cross-section of stakeholders such as assistant superintendents, principals, teachers, parents, and students. Questions that defined it included: What aims drove administrators in relation to parents and long-standing equity issues? How were administrator efforts communicated, received, responded to, and acted on by families? The findings reveal that the district administrators and principals committed to three facets of work that involved parents: (1) maintaining a working, active, administration that tried to be responsive to the stakeholder needs; (2) establishing and maintaining communication channels with parents; and (3) making the effort to mitigate the persistent inequalities that negatively affected students and families. Findings show that for these vital orientations, administrators showed commitment and good intentions yet some of the efforts were met with confusion or made no progress toward mitigating systemic inequalities. The discussion examines implications for future approaches including possible next steps for administrator efforts.
2021-08-16
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding2021-08-16
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingINQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing · 2021-01-01 · 8 citations
articleOpen accessUndiagnosed concussions increase risk of additional injuries and can prolong recovery. Because of the difficulties recognizing concussive symptoms, concussion education must specifically target improving athlete concussion reporting. Many concussion education programs are designed without significant input from athletes, resulting in a less enjoyable athlete experience, with potential implications on program efficacy. Athlete enjoyment of previous concussion education programs moderates the improvement in concussion-reporting intention after experiencing the research version of CrashCourse (CC) concussion education. Prospective cohort study. Level of evidence: Level IV. Quantitative assessment utilizing ANOVA with moderation analysis of 173 male high school football players, aged 13 to 17, who completed baseline assessments of concussion knowledge, concussion reporting, and attitudes about prior educational interventions. Athletes were subsequently shown CC, before a follow-up assessment was administered assessing the same domains. At baseline, only 58.5% of athletes reported that they enjoyed their previous concussion education. After CC, athletes were significantly more likely to endorse that they would report a suspected concussion (from 69.3% of athletes to 85.6%; P < .01). Enjoyment of previous concussion education moderated concussion-reporting intention after CC ( P = .02), with CC having a greater effect on concussion-reporting intention in athletes with low enjoyment of previous concussion education ( b = 0.21, P = .02), than on individuals with high enjoyment of previous concussion education ( P = .99). Enjoyment of CC did not have a moderating effect on concussion-reporting intention. Athletes who previously did not enjoy concussion education exhibited greater gains in concussion-reporting intention than athletes who enjoyed previous education. Given the potential risks associated with undiagnosed concussions, concussion education has sought to improve concussion reporting. Because most athletes participate in concussion education programs due to league or state mandates, improving concussion-reporting intention in these low-enjoyment athletes is of particular relevance to improving concussion-reporting intention broadly.
2021-08-16
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding2021-08-16 · 2 citations
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding2021-08-16
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding
Frequent coauthors
- 17 shared
Molly B. Zielezinski
- 15 shared
Roy D. Pea
- 12 shared
Angela Booker
University of California, San Diego
- 11 shared
Ross Zafonte
Brigham and Women's Hospital
- 10 shared
Daniel H. Daneshvar
Harvard University
- 8 shared
Lee Martin
- 8 shared
Kristen Pilner Blair
Stanford University
- 8 shared
Maureen Carroll
University of York
Education
- 1980
Ph.D., Education
Stanford University
- 1976
M.A., Education
Stanford University
- 1973
B.A., Anthropology
University of California, Santa Barbara
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Shelley Goldman
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup