Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Darien Carr

Darien Carr

· Installation Design, I Have a Door Up There (Spring 2021)

Harvard University · Theatre, Dance, and Media Studies

Active 1960–2024

h-index90
Citations42.2k
Papers55817 last 5y
Funding$38.1M
See your match with Darien Carr — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • Physical therapy
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Medicine
  • Anesthesia
  • Psychology

Selected publications

  • Features and methods to discriminate between mechanism-based categories of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi expert consensus study

    Pain · 2022 · 93 citations

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Computer Science
    • Medicine

    ABSTRACT: Classification of musculoskeletal pain based on underlying pain mechanisms (nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain) is challenging. In the absence of a gold standard, verification of features that could aid in discrimination between these mechanisms in clinical practice and research depends on expert consensus. This Delphi expert consensus study aimed to: (1) identify features and assessment findings that are unique to a pain mechanism category or shared between no more than 2 categories and (2) develop a ranked list of candidate features that could potentially discriminate between pain mechanisms. A group of international experts were recruited based on their expertise in the field of pain. The Delphi process involved 2 rounds: round 1 assessed expert opinion on features that are unique to a pain mechanism category or shared between 2 (based on a 40% agreement threshold); and round 2 reviewed features that failed to reach consensus, evaluated additional features, and considered wording changes. Forty-nine international experts representing a wide range of disciplines participated. Consensus was reached for 196 of 292 features presented to the panel (clinical examination-134 features, quantitative sensory testing-34, imaging and diagnostic testing-14, and pain-type questionnaires-14). From the 196 features, consensus was reached for 76 features as unique to nociceptive (17), neuropathic (37), or nociplastic (22) pain mechanisms and 120 features as shared between pairs of pain mechanism categories (78 for neuropathic and nociplastic pain). This consensus study generated a list of potential candidate features that are likely to aid in discrimination between types of musculoskeletal pain.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Andrzej W. Lipkowski

    Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences

    100 shared
  • M. Soledad Cepeda

    65 shared
  • Leonidas C. Goudas

    University of Patras

    63 shared
  • Richard M. Kream

    56 shared
  • Iwona Bonney

    53 shared
  • Ewan D McNicol

    MCPHS University

    52 shared
  • Iwona Maszczyńska

    52 shared
  • Joseph Lau

    43 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Darien Carr

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup