Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Jennifer M. Groh

Jennifer M. Groh

· Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience

Duke University · Neuroscience

Active 1992–2024

h-index31
Citations3.5k
Papers10834 last 5y
Funding$9.3M
See your match with Jennifer M. Groh — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychology
  • Communication
  • Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Cognitive science
  • Biology
  • Telecommunications

Selected publications

  • Coordinated multiplexing of information about separate objects in visual cortex

    eLife · 2022 · 32 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Neuroscience

    of the stimuli that may be present at a given moment? We recently showed that when more than one stimulus is present, single neurons can fluctuate between coding one vs. the other(s) across some time period, suggesting a form of neural multiplexing of different stimuli (Caruso et al., 2018). Here, we investigate (a) whether such coding fluctuations occur in early visual cortical areas; (b) how coding fluctuations are coordinated across the neural population; and (c) how coordinated coding fluctuations depend on the parsing of stimuli into separate vs. fused objects. We found coding fluctuations do occur in macaque V1 but only when the two stimuli form separate objects. Such separate objects evoked a novel pattern of V1 spike count ('noise') correlations involving distinct distributions of positive and negative values. This bimodal correlation pattern was most pronounced among pairs of neurons showing the strongest evidence for coding fluctuations or multiplexing. Whether a given pair of neurons exhibited positive or negative correlations depended on whether the two neurons both responded better to the same object or had different object preferences. Distinct distributions of spike count correlations based on stimulus preferences were also seen in V4 for separate objects but not when two stimuli fused to form one object. These findings suggest multiple objects evoke different response dynamics than those evoked by single stimuli, lending support to the multiplexing hypothesis and suggesting a means by which information about multiple objects can be preserved despite the apparent coarseness of sensory coding.

  • Compensating for a shifting world: evolving reference frames of visual and auditory signals across three multimodal brain areas

    Journal of Neurophysiology · 2021 · 28 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Neuroscience
    • Psychology
    • Communication

    Models for visual-auditory integration posit that visual signals are eye-centered throughout the brain, whereas auditory signals are converted from head-centered to eye-centered coordinates. We show instead that both modalities largely employ hybrid reference frames: neither fully head- nor eye-centered. Across three hubs of the oculomotor network (intraparietal cortex, frontal eye field, and superior colliculus) visual and auditory signals evolve from hybrid to a common eye-centered format via different dynamics across brain areas and time.

  • Monkeys and humans implement causal inference to simultaneously localize auditory and visual stimuli

    Journal of Neurophysiology · 2020 · 31 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Psychology

    We developed a novel behavioral paradigm for the study of multisensory causal inference in both humans and monkeys and found that both species make causal judgments in the same Bayes-optimal fashion. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of behavioral causal inference in animals, and this cross-species comparison lays the groundwork for future experiments using neuronal recording techniques that are impractical or impossible in human subjects.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • David LK Murphy

    Duke University

    22 shared
  • Christopher A. Shera

    University of Southern California

    20 shared
  • Valeria C. Caruso

    University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

    19 shared
  • Surya T. Tokdar

    Duke University

    17 shared
  • Cynthia King

    Duke University

    17 shared
  • Stephanie N Lovich

    Duke University

    16 shared
  • Rachel Landrum

    Duke University

    14 shared
  • Shawn M. Willett

    Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition

    13 shared

Labs

Education

  • postdoctoral, Neurobiology

    Stanford University

    1997
  • PhD, Neuroscience

    University of Pennsylvania

    1993
  • M. S., Neuroscience

    University of Michigan

    1989
  • A.B., Biology

    Princeton University

    1988

Similar researchers at Duke University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Jennifer M. Groh

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup