Rosalea Cameron
· Assistant Professor (Lecturer)University of Utah · Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders
Active 2001–2013
Research topics
- Psychology
- Audiology
- Cognitive psychology
- Linguistics
- Computer science
Selected publications
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · 2013-05-01 · 43 citations
articlePURPOSE: This investigation was designed to examine the generalization effects of semantic treatment for word retrieval deficits in people with aphasia. Semantic feature analysis (SFA; Boyle & Coelho, 1995), typicality treatment (Kiran & Thompson, 2003), and mediating strategy training were combined to maximize potential generalization effects. METHOD: Treatment, which included SFA and a semantic feature judgment task, was conducted with 9 participants with chronic aphasia in the context of multiple baseline designs across behaviors. Typical and atypical exemplars were trained across animate and inanimate categories. Treatment was sequentially modified to overtly train the use of SFA as a mediating strategy. RESULTS: Eight of the 9 participants demonstrated improvements in naming of trained stimuli. Positive generalization effects were limited overall; possible response generalization was evident for 5 participants. Instruction in the use of a mediating strategy resulted in improved naming of treated words for all participants; however, generalization to untreated words did not occur. CONCLUSION: Treatment using SFA resulted in improved naming of treated typical and atypical exemplars in both animate and inanimate categories for 8 of 9 participants. Training in a mediating strategy also resulted in improved retrieval of experimental words. Regardless of intervention approach, generalization to untreated items was limited.
Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Examination of Treatment Intensity and Practice Schedule
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · 2013-02-01 · 46 citations
articlePURPOSE: The authors designed this investigation to extend the development of a treatment for acquired apraxia of speech (AOS)--sound production treatment (SPT)--by examining the effects of 2 treatment intensities and 2 schedules of practice. METHOD: The authors used a multiple baseline design across participants and behaviors with 4 speakers with chronic AOS and aphasia. Accuracy of production of trained and untrained words in phrases served as the dependent measure. Participants received 4 permutations of SPT (i.e., intensive-blocked, intensive-random, traditional-blocked, and traditional-random) applied sequentially to different lists of words. RESULTS: Positive changes in accuracy of articulation were observed for all participants for all phases of treatment. Two participants had a slightly poorer response to the traditional-random application of treatment. However, no clinically meaningful differences were noted among treatment applications when follow-up data were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this preliminary Phase II investigation suggest that similar outcomes may be achieved with SPT applied with different treatment intensities and different practice schedules. Extending treatment to achieve higher levels of accuracy may have improved maintenance effects, which may have revealed possible differences among conditions. In addition, overlap in methods used for random and blocked practice may have minimized distinctions between these conditions.
The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · 2012-01-01
articleOpen accessSenior authorThe primary characteristics considered to define acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) have continued to evolve, but a few characteristics remain controversial among researchers and clinicians (McNeil, Robin, & Schmidt, 2009). Particularly, the consistency or variability of speech sound errors in AOS (Croot, 2002). For years, variability of speech sound errors has been considered a primary characteristic of AOS (Deal & Darley, 1972; Johns & Darley, 1970; Wertz, LaPointe, & Rosenbek, 1984). Apraxic errors were considered to be variable with regard to the location of the error within a word (Johns & Darley; LaPointe & Johns, 1975) and the nature of the error (Johns & Darley; LaPointe & Horner, 1976) across repeated productions of the same stimuli. Conversely, more recent research with “pure” apraxic speakers and speakers with AOS and accompanying aphasia has suggested that speech sound errors may not be variable (Mauszycki, Dromey, & Wambaugh, 2007; Mauszycki, Wambaugh, & Cameron, 2010a, 2010b; Mlcoch, Darley, & Noll, 1982; McNeil, Odell, Miller, & Hunter, 1995; Shuster & Wambaugh, 2003; Wambaugh, Nessler, Bennett & Mauszycki, 2004). However, there are limited data examining sound errors over time (i.e., beyond a single session). Furthermore, the influence of conditions of stimuli presentation on sound errors remains uncertain. The purpose of this investigation was to further examine variability of speech production in individuals with AOS and aphasia. Of specific interest were the effects of repeated sampling and conditions of stimulus presentation (i.e., random and blocked by sound) on the variability of error types identified using narrow phonetic transcription.
Maximizing Generalization Effects of Semantic Feature Analysis
The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · 2012-01-01
articleOpen accessNumerous treatments have been developed that have successfully facilitated naming in aphasia (see Laine & Martin, 2006 for a review). However, in most cases, positive treatment effects have been observed primarily with trained items, with limited improvements in untrained items. That is, response generalization remains a challenge in the treatment of anomia.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · 2012-05-01 · 36 citations
articlePURPOSE: This investigation was designed to elucidate the effects of repeated practice treatment on sound production accuracy in individuals with apraxia of speech (AOS) and aphasia. A secondary purpose was to determine if the addition of rate/rhythm control to treatment provided further benefits beyond those achieved with repeated practice. METHOD: A single-subject design was employed with 10 speakers with chronic AOS and aphasia. Articulation accuracy served as the dependent measure. Participants received repeated practice treatment until a plateau in performance was observed or high levels of accuracy were achieved. If performance criterion was not reached, rate/rhythm control was added to the treatment to determine if additional gains would be made. RESULTS: For 8 of the participants, improvements were evident for all applications of repeated practice treatment, and positive response generalization was observed in most cases. When rate/rhythm control treatment was applied, modest additional gains were apparent for the majority of the applications. The 2 participants who did not benefit from repeated practice treatment also did not show improvements with rate/rhythm control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated practice treatment resulted in improved articulation for the majority of participants. The amount of improvement varied within and across participants. Rate/rhythm control appeared to have limited additional benefits for some participants.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · 2012-05-01 · 7 citations
articleSenior authorPURPOSE: Early apraxia of speech (AOS) research has characterized errors as being variable, resulting in a number of different error types being produced on repeated productions of the same stimuli. Conversely, recent research has uncovered greater consistency in errors, but there are limited data examining sound errors over time (more than one occasion). Furthermore, the influence of conditions of stimulus presentation (blocked vs. random) on sound errors remains uncertain. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of repeated sampling and conditions of stimulus presentation on speech sound errors for 11 speakers with AOS/aphasia. METHOD: Trisyllabic words consisting of 7 target phonemes in the initial position served as stimuli. On 3 occasions, stimuli were elicited under 2 conditions: blocked (by phoneme) and randomized presentation. Speech productions were analyzed via narrow phonetic transcription. RESULTS: Findings revealed a similar overall mean percentage of errors in both conditions and across sampling occasions. Distortions were the dominant error type. CONCLUSION: There was no obvious pattern of responding across sampling occasions or conditions of stimulus presentation. The dominant error type differed among target phonemes, but there appeared to be some degree of consistency in the error types produced for the majority of target phonemes.
Apraxia of Speech: Perceptual Analysis of Trisyllabic Words Across Repeated Sampling Occasions
The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · 2011-01-01
articleOpen accessSenior authorApraxia of Speech: Perceptual Analysis of Trisyllabic Words Across Repeated Sampling Occasions
Effects of Repetition and Rate/Rhythm Treatments for Acquired Apraxia of Speech
The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · 2011-01-01
articleOpen accessThis investigation was designed to elucidate the effects of repeated practice treatment on sound production in AOS and to determine if the addition of rate/rhythm control to treatment provided further benefits. A combined multiple baseline and ABCA design was employed with five speakers with chronic AOS and aphasia. Accuracy of articulation of target items in probes served as the dependent measure. Substantial improvements in articulation were associated with repeated practice treatment for three of the participants, with minimal gains observed for the remaining two participants. Rate/rhythm control resulted in additional gains for two of the participants.
Individual variability on discourse measures over repeated sampling times in persons with aphasia
Aphasiology · 2010-01-01 · 40 citations
article1st authorCorrespondingBackground: Although persons with aphasia typically have difficulty with the production of language at the level of discourse, there is a paucity of reliable measurement systems to quantify the characteristics of spoken language. Nicholas and Brookshire (Citation1993) developed one of the few standardised, rule-based systems to quantify the informativeness of spoken language samples. While the authors reported temporal stability for all measures, they also noted variability at the individual level. Because individual data were not reported, it is difficult to determine the nature and extent of that variability.
Aphasiology · 2010-01-01 · 22 citations
articleSenior authorShannon C. Mauszyckia*, Julie L. Wambaugha & Rosalea M. Camerona a VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System , University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Frequent coauthors
- 44 shared
Julie L. Wambaugh
University of Utah
- 38 shared
Shannon C. Mauszycki
- 19 shared
Christina Nessler
- 8 shared
Sandra Wright
VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System
- 4 shared
Michael Blomgren
- 4 shared
Nelson Roy
Google (United States)
- 4 shared
Herbert A. Leeper
- 2 shared
Michelene Kalinyak-Fliszar
Temple University
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Rosalea Cameron
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup