Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Xuhui Lee

Xuhui Lee

Verified

Yale University · Environmental Health

Active 1991–2024

h-index82
Citations26.7k
Papers40292 last 5y
Funding$2.1M
See your match with Xuhui Lee — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Geography
  • Atmospheric sciences
  • Environmental science
  • Ecology
  • Geology
  • Meteorology
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics
  • Climatology

Selected publications

  • Increased heat risk in wet climate induced by urban humid heat

    Nature · 2023 · 253 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Environmental science
    • Climatology
    • Atmospheric sciences
  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites

    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · 2021 · 498 citations

    • Environmental science
    • Atmospheric sciences
    • Geography

    Large datasets of greenhouse gas and energy surface-atmosphere fluxes measured with the eddy-covariance technique (e.g., FLUXNET2015, AmeriFlux BASE) are widely used to benchmark models and remote-sensing products. This study addresses one of the major challenges facing model-data integration: To what spatial extent do flux measurements taken at individual eddy-covariance sites reflect model- or satellite-based grid cells? We evaluate flux footprints—the temporally dynamic source areas that contribute to measured fluxes—and the representativeness of these footprints for target areas (e.g., within 250–3000 m radii around flux towers) that are often used in flux-data synthesis and modeling studies. We examine the land-cover composition and vegetation characteristics, represented here by the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), in the flux footprints and target areas across 214 AmeriFlux sites, and evaluate potential biases as a consequence of the footprint-to-target-area mismatch. Monthly 80% footprint climatologies vary across sites and through time ranging four orders of magnitude from 103 to 107 m2 due to the measurement heights, underlying vegetation- and ground-surface characteristics, wind directions, and turbulent state of the atmosphere. Few eddy-covariance sites are located in a truly homogeneous landscape. Thus, the common model-data integration approaches that use a fixed-extent target area across sites introduce biases on the order of 4%–20% for EVI and 6%–20% for the dominant land cover percentage. These biases are site-specific functions of measurement heights, target area extents, and land-surface characteristics. We advocate that flux datasets need to be used with footprint awareness, especially in research and applications that benchmark against models and data products with explicit spatial information. We propose a simple representativeness index based on our evaluations that can be used as a guide to identify site-periods suitable for specific applications and to provide general guidance for data use.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Wei Xiao

    China Meteorological Administration

    99 shared
  • Shoudong Liu

    Chifeng Municipal Hospital

    75 shared
  • John M. Baker

    United States Department of Agriculture

    71 shared
  • Timothy J. Griffis

    University of Minnesota

    66 shared
  • Xuefa Wen

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

    59 shared
  • Qitao Xiao

    57 shared
  • Cheng Hu

    Nanjing Forestry University

    51 shared
  • Zhongwang Wei

    51 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Xuhui Lee

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup