Andy J. Danylchuk
· Professor, Environmental ConservationVerifiedUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · Ecology, Evolution, and Animal Behavior
Active 1994–2026
About
Andy J. Danylchuk is a Professor of Environmental Conservation at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, specializing in Organismic & Evolutionary Biology. His research focuses on understanding the factors that naturally influence the life history and ecology of fishes and other aquatic organisms, as well as how natural and anthropogenic disturbances can impact their populations. His work encompasses both marine and freshwater systems and includes areas such as stress physiology, behavioral ecology, spatial ecology, predator-prey interactions, and adaptations in life history traits in response to disturbance. Much of Dr. Danylchuk’s research evaluates the potential impacts of recreational angling on fish populations and involves collaboration with stakeholder groups to develop best practices for the recreational angling community. He employs telemetry and emerging technologies to study how fish function under normal and disturbed conditions, combining laboratory and field manipulations to identify specific mechanistic causes of stress in fish. Additionally, he is interested in sustainable aquaculture and the development of integrated food production models aimed at reducing impacts on fish stocks and ecosystems at various scales. Dr. Danylchuk is also a strong advocate for experiential, hands-on learning opportunities that enhance educational experiences for students of all ages.
Research topics
- Fishery
- Biology
- Political Science
- Ecology
- Environmental resource management
- Environmental planning
- Geography
- Computer Science
- Business
- Economics
- Medicine
- Internal medicine
- Natural resource economics
- Surgery
- Physiology
- Public relations
- Marketing
Selected publications
Marine Ecology Progress Series · 2026-01-21
articleUnderstanding the functional role of habitats to wild animals can aid in implementing management actions to protect critical habitat from anthropogenic threats. However, habitat function is challenging to measure across extensive space and time, particularly in marine systems. We used acoustic telemetry tags equipped with tri-axial accelerometer sensors to track the movement and locomotor activity of permit Trachinotus falcatus in coastal marine habitats of the Florida Keys (USA) so that we could remotely characterize their behavioural ecology and infer habitat function. Recent research in this system explored space use by permits and identified shallow seagrass flats and offshore reefs and wrecks as important foraging and spawning habitats, respectively. Predictive models applied here identified variation in permit activity patterns across a diversity of spatial (i.e. habitat type and site) and temporal (e.g. time of day, lunar phase) factors as well as complex interactions. Based on known permit behavioural ecology, peaks in activity in the late afternoon to evening at putative spawning sites were used to infer the spatial-temporal dynamics of likely spawning activity. This spawning signature was observed at 8 offshore reef locations, with considerable seasonal variation amongst sites. Timing of spawning may therefore vary among sites, while the functional role of some sites likely extends beyond spawning (e.g. staging, foraging). These data provide insights into permit spawning sites and behaviour and highlight the potential for acoustic telemetry equipped with acceleration sensors to generate knowledge relevant to habitat and fisheries management.
Fisheries Research · 2026-04-02
article1st authorCorrespondingCharacterizing a century of shark depredation in US Atlantic recreational fisheries
ICES Journal of Marine Science · 2026-04-01
articleOpen accessAbstract Shark depredation on target species in US Atlantic recreational fisheries is a growing source of human-wildlife conflict. Efforts to mitigate this conflict require an understanding of how its three principal components—anglers, fisheries, and sharks—have evolved over time. Through a historical perspective, we offer a conceptual framework that characterizes the dynamics of these components in the context of complex management systems for the affected fisheries. Specifically, we integrated observations of shark depredation from the published literature, angler surveys, and social media content to provide a comprehensive overview of the breadth of shark depredation in recreational fisheries in US Atlantic waters from Maine to Texas, and the US Caribbean. This exercise revealed that shark depredation is widespread, with 207 unique target-depredator connections (at least 51 target species impacted by 22 shark depredators). The most prevalent shark depredators included both authorized species that may be harvested (e.g. bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas) and prohibited species that may not (e.g. sandbar sharks C. plumbeus). This broad characterization further clarifies the actors (anglers, fisheries, sharks, and managers) that should be considered in ongoing efforts to establish valid shark depredation solutions, evaluates mitigation options given US regulatory constraints, and identifies priorities for future research.
The importance of engaging the hook-and-line fishing industry in fisheries research
Fisheries Research · 2026-04-10
articleCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2026-05-19
articleAssessing the behaviour of fish in the wild is challenging given the lack of relevant “controls” to assess recovery following capture. Our aim was to assess how long it takes largemouth bass (Micropterus nigricans) and northern pike (Esox lucius) equipped with pop-off biologgers to resume normal behaviour (i.e., return to baseline movement and exploration activity) once released. Both species were equipped with acoustic transmitters in a whole-lake positioning system to model their movement patterns and behaviour. We recaptured those same individuals at a minimum of 37d later and affixed pop-off biologgers that recorded acceleration and depth allowing us to combine data from two technologies to assess the post-release behaviour of the fish. In 20–28.5C water temperatures, it took largemouth bass equipped with biologgers 129h (95% CI: 106-149h) to resume normal movement and 154h (103-195h) for exploration activity. Northern pike equipped with pop-off biologgers took 145h (110-174h) to resume normal movement activity. Exploratory behaviour of northern pike was not influenced. These results reveal that catch-and-release angling can yield post-release behavioural consequences for up to 7d.
Environmental Biology of Fishes · 2026-02-16
article1st authorEvaluating hook removal techniques on jaw-hooked Smallmouth Bass captured with soft plastic jigs
North American Journal of Fisheries Management · 2025-04-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessABSTRACT Objective Products that are intended to facilitate the release of angled fish continue to be developed by the fishing industry without systematic and objective evaluation to test their effectiveness for releasing fish without causing undue harm. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of dehooking methods (i.e., removing the hook with bare hands, pliers, or a mechanical dehooking device) while either holding the fish in air by the lower mandible or without touching the fish. Methods We captured 131 Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu by using barbed Ned rigs (single-hook, soft plastic jig-style lures) and assessed the duration of time needed to remove the hook, the extent of physical injury caused by the hook removal method, and the extent of reflex impairment of the fish. Results Unhooking time was influenced by hook removal method and fish length. Physical injury was also influenced by the unhooking method; the use of pliers while holding the fish by the lower mandible resulted in no observed injuries compared to all other dehooking methods, which resulted in some proportion of fish being injured. Longer unhooking time increased reflex impairment. The traditional method of holding the lower mandible of black bass yielded faster dehooking times and fewer injuries irrespective of hook removal method, but the use of hands proved to be the fastest method. Conclusions Our research suggested that an alternative method of touchless dehooking and the use of a mechanical dehooking tool were not effective when releasing shallow-hooked Smallmouth Bass. Our findings also suggested that gripping the fish by the lower mandible and using hands constituted the most effective hook removal approach for Smallmouth Bass in the context studied here.
On the behavior of Fish Released Following Fisheries Capture: Methods, Endpoints, and Consequences
Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · 2025-06-18
articleFisheries · 2025-03-05 · 3 citations
articleOpen accessEnvironmental Biology of Fishes · 2025-07-03 · 1 citations
article
Frequent coauthors
- 221 shared
Steven J. Cooke
Carleton University
- 86 shared
Cory D. Suski
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- 81 shared
Jacob W. Brownscombe
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
- 54 shared
Karen J. Murchie
Shedd Aquarium
- 52 shared
Aaron J. Adams
Bonefish and Tarpon Trust
- 50 shared
Robert J. Lennox
Dalhousie University
- 46 shared
Tony L. Goldberg
University of Wisconsin Health
- 43 shared
Lucas P. Griffin
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Education
- 1990
B.S.
Trent University
- 1993
M.S.
University of Alberta
- 2003
Ph.D.
University of Alberta
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Andy J. Danylchuk
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup