
Anil Vachani
VerifiedUniversity of Pennsylvania · Rehabilitation Medicine
Active 2003–2026
About
Anil Vachani, MD, MSCE, is an Emeritus Professor of Medicine in the Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. He serves as the Chief of Medicine (Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care) and is an Attending Physician at the Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center. His roles include Director of Clinical Research in the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, as well as Director of Bronchoscopy at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center. Additionally, he is the Co-Director of the Lung Cancer Screening Program at both the Perelman School of Medicine and the Philadelphia VA Medical Center.
Research topics
- Internal medicine
- Computational biology
- Pathology
- Intensive care medicine
- Biology
- Bioinformatics
- Genetics
- Family medicine
- Radiology
- Medicine
Selected publications
Journal of Thoracic Disease · 2026-03-01
articleOpen accessAbstract: The objective of this study was to quantify and characterize the presence of non-tumor size features among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in a surgical cohort versus those in a non-surgical cohort and assess the potential impact of key features on staging. A total of 22,876 patients aged 66 years and older with newly diagnosed (2010–2015) stage I–III NSCLC (T1–T3, N0/N1, M0) without prior or concurrent primary cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Database. Reported T stage data (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition) were compared with a hypothetical tumor size only T stage (Tsize-Only), which did not account for non-tumor size defining characteristics. Frequencies of key non-tumor size features were analyzed among surgical and non-surgical cohorts. In the surgical cohort, a lower Tsize-Only vs. SEER-reported T stage was observed in 2,531 patients (20.8%). Specifically, T stage would be lower in 1,542 (32.6%) patients with T2 disease and in 989 (66.4%) patients with T3 disease. In the non-surgical cohort, lower Tsize-Only vs. Reported T was observed in 1,446 patients (13.5%) [342 (8.8%) patients with T2 disease and 1,104 (60.1%) patients with T3 disease]. The largest disparity between cohorts was in T2 disease and visceral pleural invasion (VPI): VPI was identified in 87.5% of surgically resected patients with lower Tsize-Only versus only 37.4% in non-surgical patients. Our findings highlight the need for better T stage characterization in non-surgical patients. Development of predictive models or standardized radiographic methods to accurately identify VPI in the non-surgical NSCLC population are recommended in light of the established impact of VPI on clinical outcomes. Trial investigators should consider the potential impact of un-identified VPI on their effect size estimates and sample size calculations. Attention towards non-tumor size related features, particularly VPI, may lead to improved treatment decisions and outcomes
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2026-03-19
articleMonitoring the Harms of Lung Cancer Screening: Why the Nonmalignant Resection Rate Is Our Best Bet
Journal of the American College of Radiology · 2025-12-01 · 3 citations
articleOpen access2025-11-26
articleOpen access<p>Probability Threshold Plot. The figure displays the probability threshold plot for the complete range of the model's operating characteristics.</p>
2025-11-26
articleOpen access<p>Metrics related to model utility in temporal validation in Optum EHR</p>
2025-11-26
articleOpen access<p>List of 278 predictors and coefficient values in the final EHR model</p>
2025-11-26
articleOpen accessSupplementary Table from Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology · 2025-11-01
articleOpen accessBackground: Accurate prognosis in mNSCLC treated with immunotherapy can guide clinical decisions.We developed machine learning (ML) models to predict overall survival (OS) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in mNSCLC patients receiving pembrolizumab, based on clinicopathological features. Methods:We retrospectively analysed mNSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab at the Prof.Dr. Ion Chiricuta Oncology Institute in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, from 2018 to 2023.Patients with missing data or who received <4 cycles of pembrolizumab were excluded, yielding 124 patients.We recorded clinical and paraclinical variables, including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), primary tumour T stage, presence of bone or brain metastases, multiple metastatic sites, prior palliative radiotherapy, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immuneinflammation index (SII), and PD-L1 status.To address class imbalance, we applied SMOTE.Two SVM models were then trained with an 80/20 train-test split using 5fold cross-validation: a standard SVM and a weighted SVM in which each feature was weighted according to its hazard ratio from a multivariate Cox regression on OS.Results: Model A achieved accuracies of 90%, 82.17%, 82.30%, and 68.50% with areas under the curve (AUC)s of 0.39, 0.84, 0.87, and 0.69 for 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24months OS.Model B reached accuracies of 89.53%, 80.53%, 83.1%, and 69.3% and AUCs of 0.60, 0.86, 0.85, and 0.72 at the same timestamps.SHAP identified ECOG PS, age, multiple metastatic sites, NLR and SII as strongest predictors. Conclusions:These findings indicate that SVM-based algorithms integrating routine clinical data and inflammatory biomarkers can effectively predict survival in mNSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab.Incorporating Cox-derived prognostic weights for each feature improved model accuracy, suggesting that combining traditional survival analysis with ML enhances discriminative performance.Such AI-driven prognostic tools may help stratify patients by risk and personalise treatment decisions.Validation in larger, independent cohorts is needed to confirm generalisability.
2025-11-26
articleOpen accessSupplementary Table from Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda
2025-11-26
articleOpen access<p>Flow Chart of Cohort Attrition and Study Design. A, shows the cohort attrition after applying eligibility criteria and the distribution of samples used for training and test sets. B, shows the parameters used for model development and study design.</p>
Recent grants
NIH · $9.0M · 2022–2027
NIH · $414k · 2014
Environmental Health Informatics Core
NIH · $16.5M · 2006–2030
NIH · $692k · 2012
Center for Research to Optimize Precision Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse Populations
NIH · $12.8M · 2018–2025
Frequent coauthors
- 101 shared
Katharine A. Rendle
Abramson Cancer Center
- 83 shared
Steven Μ. Albelda
- 62 shared
Jeffrey C. Thompson
University of Pennsylvania
- 60 shared
Corey J. Langer
University of Pennsylvania
- 54 shared
William N. Rom
- 54 shared
Louise C. Showe
- 53 shared
Michael K. Showe
- 49 shared
Justin E. Bekelman
University of Pennsylvania
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Anil Vachani
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup